Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

Isn’t this a dishonest statement? You don’t show causality, and leave open to su

Isn’t this a dishonest statement? You don’t show causality, and leave open to suggestion by bias = Lying.

Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 06:20:39 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713249216290824192

Reply addressees: @diana_jou @pmarca @DowJones @WSJ

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713241799674859522

IN REPLY TO:

@diana_jou

Women who make up 47% of the union workforce @dowjones, made 86% as much as the men. https://t.co/jVPqu2nKqb @WSJ https://t.co/51XKLWwFOq

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713241799674859522

March 25, 2016
NEWBIES

http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2016/01/05/an-overview-of-propertarianism-for-serious-newbies/FOR NEWBIES.

Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 23:56:00 UTC

March 24, 2016
I know that his is a falsehood, and was created as a falsehood. It’s like “Socia

I know that his is a falsehood, and was created as a falsehood. It’s like “Social Justice” Its a nonsense word used to justify.

Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 14:21:46 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713007905323237377

Reply addressees: @wjfrisby

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713000913871499264

IN REPLY TO:

@wjfrisby

@curtdoolittle It sounds as though you haven’t much time for a phrase such as “the greatest good of the greatest number”.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713000913871499264

March 24, 2016
Don’t justify failure. Try to find success. 🙂

Don’t justify failure. Try to find success. 🙂

Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 14:20:53 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713007682920308737

Reply addressees: @wjfrisby

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713001459512700928

IN REPLY TO:

@wjfrisby

@curtdoolittle Not that I agree with that particular sentiment; but a “fuzzy” idea can still be useful.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713001459512700928

March 24, 2016
Fuzzy ideas provide comforting distractions that prevent to solutions of real pr

Fuzzy ideas provide comforting distractions that prevent to solutions of real problems. So no. 😉

Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 14:20:33 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713007600158289921

Reply addressees: @wjfrisby

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713001459512700928

IN REPLY TO:

@wjfrisby

@curtdoolittle Not that I agree with that particular sentiment; but a “fuzzy” idea can still be useful.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713001459512700928

March 24, 2016
It’s ok to be jealous. 😉 I understand

It’s ok to be jealous. 😉 I understand.

Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 13:31:12 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712995182250225666

Reply addressees: @theturdz

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712994803122888704

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712994803122888704

March 24, 2016
Not quite. 😉 Even if it were true, attack the argument not the person arguing.

Not quite. 😉 Even if it were true, attack the argument not the person arguing. Otherwise you’re admitting you can’t.

Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 13:23:26 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712993225909383168

Reply addressees: @theturdz @AliceTeller

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712989400498614272

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712989400498614272

March 24, 2016
Better to watch and learn. It’s not me that doesn’t understand

Better to watch and learn. It’s not me that doesn’t understand.

Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 13:03:50 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712988294460604416

Reply addressees: @AliceTeller

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712972405682126848

IN REPLY TO:

@AliceTeller

@curtdoolittle Defeat? Yes, I give up. You can say A=B all day, as cleverly as you wish, that doesn’t make it so.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712972405682126848

March 24, 2016
And I suspect you are too smart a person not to know that “balderdash” is an adm

And I suspect you are too smart a person not to know that “balderdash” is an admission of defeat. 😉 Love you anyway.

Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 11:57:29 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712971597498425345

Reply addressees: @AliceTeller

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712970887478292480

IN REPLY TO:

@AliceTeller

@curtdoolittle Balderdsah!

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712970887478292480

March 24, 2016
Otherwise it’s just an excuse for theft by elaborate fraud

Otherwise it’s just an excuse for theft by elaborate fraud.

Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 10:46:59 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712953853780615169

Reply addressees: @mattyglesias

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712953313889751040

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712953313889751040

March 24, 2016