http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2016/01/05/an-overview-of-propertarianism-for-serious-newbies/FOR NEWBIES.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 23:56:00 UTC
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
I know that his is a falsehood, and was created as a falsehood. It’s like “Socia
I know that his is a falsehood, and was created as a falsehood. It’s like “Social Justice” Its a nonsense word used to justify.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 14:21:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713007905323237377
Reply addressees: @wjfrisby
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713000913871499264
IN REPLY TO:
@wjfrisby
@curtdoolittle It sounds as though you haven’t much time for a phrase such as “the greatest good of the greatest number”.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713000913871499264
-
Don’t justify failure. Try to find success. 🙂
Don’t justify failure. Try to find success. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 14:20:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713007682920308737
Reply addressees: @wjfrisby
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713001459512700928
IN REPLY TO:
@wjfrisby
@curtdoolittle Not that I agree with that particular sentiment; but a “fuzzy” idea can still be useful.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713001459512700928
-
Fuzzy ideas provide comforting distractions that prevent to solutions of real pr
Fuzzy ideas provide comforting distractions that prevent to solutions of real problems. So no. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 14:20:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713007600158289921
Reply addressees: @wjfrisby
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713001459512700928
IN REPLY TO:
@wjfrisby
@curtdoolittle Not that I agree with that particular sentiment; but a “fuzzy” idea can still be useful.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713001459512700928
-
It’s ok to be jealous. 😉 I understand
It’s ok to be jealous. 😉 I understand.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 13:31:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712995182250225666
Reply addressees: @theturdz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712994803122888704
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712994803122888704
-
Not quite. 😉 Even if it were true, attack the argument not the person arguing.
Not quite. 😉 Even if it were true, attack the argument not the person arguing. Otherwise you’re admitting you can’t.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 13:23:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712993225909383168
Reply addressees: @theturdz @AliceTeller
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712989400498614272
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712989400498614272
-
Better to watch and learn. It’s not me that doesn’t understand
Better to watch and learn. It’s not me that doesn’t understand.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 13:03:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712988294460604416
Reply addressees: @AliceTeller
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712972405682126848
IN REPLY TO:
@AliceTeller
@curtdoolittle Defeat? Yes, I give up. You can say A=B all day, as cleverly as you wish, that doesn’t make it so.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712972405682126848
-
And I suspect you are too smart a person not to know that “balderdash” is an adm
And I suspect you are too smart a person not to know that “balderdash” is an admission of defeat. 😉 Love you anyway.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 11:57:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712971597498425345
Reply addressees: @AliceTeller
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712970887478292480
IN REPLY TO:
@AliceTeller
@curtdoolittle Balderdsah!
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712970887478292480
-
Otherwise it’s just an excuse for theft by elaborate fraud
Otherwise it’s just an excuse for theft by elaborate fraud.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 10:46:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712953853780615169
Reply addressees: @mattyglesias
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712953313889751040
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712953313889751040
-
Full accounting, not fraud, Matt. Unless you measure changes in ALL capital, you
Full accounting, not fraud, Matt. Unless you measure changes in ALL capital, you’re just demonstrating selection bias.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 10:46:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712953608053133312
Reply addressees: @mattyglesias
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712953313889751040
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712953313889751040