Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • You write empty Words for Stupid People. Capital is used to organize production,

    You write empty Words for Stupid People. Capital is used to organize production, distribution and trade. It isn’t consumable.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-10 06:21:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/719047639325634560

    Reply addressees: @70torinoman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/719044397749239810


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/719044397749239810

  • MUSLIM CONFIDENCE IN THEIR IGNORANCE (you see this kind of stupidity from the le

    MUSLIM CONFIDENCE IN THEIR IGNORANCE

    (you see this kind of stupidity from the left and the muslims)

    —If socialism is the next stage of human society, why bother fighting for it?—

    Socialism is impossible. It cannot be the next stage of human society. So the question is not meaningful.

    –But look at this quote: “…….”—- (moronic sophist drivel that conflates economic and political models, ie: verbalisms.)

    Definitions:

    Socialism: the involuntary organization of investment, production, distribution, and trade and the absence of rational incentives.

    Capitalism: the voluntary organization of investment, production,m distribution and trade, and the presence of rational incentives.

    “Mixed Economy”: the voluntary organization of production distribution and trade, and a ‘fee’ collected by the government for use in the production of commons by legislative means.

    Rule of Law: the market economy in which all actions must be voluntary, fully informed, productive, and free of negative externality

    Democracy: (economic or unitary) the selection of legislation by majority rule.

    Republic: the selection of representatives who determine legislative outputs by majority rule as proxy for citizens.

    Totalitarianism: the choice of commands at the discretion of some elite.

    So whomever is writing what you quote is a very ignorant person.

    I have another question:

    Why do you think you are either smart enough or knowledgeable enough to discuss these topics, and hold an opinion on these topics? This is the interesting question.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-10 02:38:00 UTC

  • Then submit resumes to come here. Try to find a job that pays at least 3k a mont

    Then submit resumes to come here. Try to find a job that pays at least 3k a month. Women alone are worth it.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-09 20:40:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718901308875530240

    Reply addressees: @SanguineEmpiric @vosskriger

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718880388156796929


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718880388156796929

  • That might be enough

    That might be enough.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-09 19:24:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718882380329656321

    Reply addressees: @SanguineEmpiric @vosskriger

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718880388156796929


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718880388156796929

  • Retweeted Joe (@Levi_Pride): “But Trump spreads hate, fear and violence!” Good.

    Retweeted Joe (@Levi_Pride): “But Trump spreads hate, fear and violence!” Good. So far the love, candlelit vigils, and community hugs have done nothing to stop ISIS.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-09 16:54:00 UTC

  • Reason Magazine’s Straw Man Attack on Trump Illustrates The Poverty Of Libertinism

    [R]eason’s Straw Men :

    RE: http://reason.com/blog/2016/04/06/the-alt-right-is-wrong-trump-is-an-enemy

    –“Some of Donald Trump’s most ardent supporters believe he is the only candidate who will defend Western culture from its enemies both foreign (illegal immigrants, Muslims) and domestic (cultural relativists, campus leftists).”—

    No, we believe he is the only candidate that will transform the administration from an ideological to an empirical one – and throw the bums out so to speak who compromise. (Ergo, straw man)

    —“The U.S. is besieged by forces that want to destroy its cultural heritage, and Trump is the only one who gets that, they say.”—

    The USA is no longer in a position to bear endless third world immigration, endless asymmetric trade relationships, and endless funding of the world police force (nato). (Ergo, straw man) (Author is relying upon psychologism which is an anti-empirical propaganda tool of Marxist Critique, not engaging in truthful debate about questions of social, economic, and political, science.)

    —“This is a terrible reason to support Trump, but not because the values of the West aren’t worth protecting—they are.”—

    Having created a straw man, that the questions are psychologisms, the author now attempts to refute his own position, not the position of trump or the people who support trump. (Again, the author is using the Common Marxist Technique of creating moral straw men in place of empirical arguments. I am well aware that most libertarian thought is in fact constructed on marxist method of argumentation for the same reasons – obscurantism, suggestion, misrepresentation. But the author is rather ‘crude’ in his application of the marxist technique.)

    —“The sad! fact is that Trump adamantly rejects two of the most important legacies of the Enlightenment and Western society: free markets and freedom of the press.”—

    Both of these ‘innovations’ were fallacies. (a) Freedom of truthful speech, and (b) freedom of markets equally free of externality would have been innovations. However, the pseudoscientific conquest of the west (by boaz, freud, marx, cantor, mises, keynes, the frankfurt school, rothbard/rand, leo strauss, and the various movement conservatives was achieved only because of the combination of free rather than truthful press, tolerance for advocacy of theft (socialism, communism), tolerance for advocacy of free riding on the commons (libertinism/libertarianism), tolerance for military expansionism (neo-conservatism, movement conservatism). And the economy was jeopardized because of the tolerance for externalities (export of knowledge, labor arbitrage trading consumption for dilution of the skill base).

    –“No presidential candidate who fails to grasp why unrestricted trade across national borders is the hallmark of a civilized society is fit to lead one, and no leader who seeks the power to shut down newspapers who criticize him can be trusted to defend classical liberalism from its enemies.”—

    No person who fails to grasp that he advocates theft from others by externality, free riding, pseudoscientific fraud, is not a hall;mark of civilized society but of SEPARATIST PARASITISM UPON THE HOST POPULATION. The cost of creating production in the voluntary organization of production (capitalism) is born by every living soul in the polity. So what the author is advocating is PRIVATIZATION OF COMMONS (theft). Period. End of argument. The secret to western success was the oath: I shall not lie or steal. Yet by engaging in propaganda the author lies (pseudoscience) and steals (advocates theft by externality and free riding).

    —“White nationalists, in Holt’s view, are misguided to the extent that they put undue importance on race. It’s the values of Western Europeans, not their skin color, that matters: “—

    This is false, and another ‘values’ psychologism.(Another Big Lie) (a) homogenous people redistribute, and heterogenous people done. (b) commons are produced by redistribution (c) commons are a competitive advantage. (d) normative commons are the most competitive advantage (e) property rights and truth telling are the most competitive normative advantages. (f) no group can produce a western high trust society with property rights and truth telling if the median IQ is below current 100 to perhaps 105. (g) The west achieved higher normative distribution of IQ, lower distribution of impulsivity and aggression, through the systematic eugenic culling of people by hanging, war, and manorial control of reproduction and food consumption. (h) ergo, race matters a great deal. It may in fact matter MOST.

    —“Trump has any standing to claim that he is “unabashedly pro-Western.” A man cannot portray himself as the defender of the Enlightenment, modern Western civilization, and classical liberalism if he is desperate to undo its crowning achievements.”—

    Falsehood. As we have shown, these are pseudoscientific frauds, not achievements. Falsehood. Western civilization is defined by meritocracy, empiricism, truth telling, and a requirement for productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, free of negative externality, because this is the only method of cooperation that (a) does not produce retaliation (b) is tolerable between kin, and (c) is non parasitic (theft). The enlightenment was a catastrophe – an exchange for aristocracy and christian mysticism for democracy and pseudoscience – tools of the leftists. It is those pseudosciences and the above listed frauds that we are undoing using empirical science today.

    —“Of course, there’s nothing particularly Western about the Dark Ages—the entire world has suffered some version of the West’s long period of tribal warfare, poverty, and repression.”—

    Falsehood. The dark ages were caused by: (a) excessive immigration into the empire. (b) the increased cost of maintaining a land empire instead of a naval empire (c) the Justinian plague made possible by the expansion of trade and the increase in population density in the core trading area (byzantium). (d) the dependence upon slave/serf labor for agrarian production. (e) the closing of the stoic schools and forcible introduction of christianity. (f) the rise of militant islam and the loss of northern african grain production, followed by the conquest of the byzantines and Sassanids (persians), thereby destroying the cycle of mediterranean trade. (g) a failure of the aristocracy to breed in sufficient numbers to maintain a professional warrior class (h) the success of the muslims in piracy and raiding causing the total collapse of the Mediterranean trade, the roman urban life, and all urban life in Europe. Urban=Market. There was no more need for Rome to fall than there was for China. China succeeded because they professionalized the military and the bureaucracy. Rome failed to. Roman Aristocracy was too diluted to reform a warrior class sufficient to offset the Muslim conquest. Thankfully the rise of the vikings, normans, and french as a consequence produced professional warriors again, which could be exported to the levant to ‘take the battle to the enemy’. Trade is only as good as the negative externalities it produces. THERE ARE NO ABSOLUTE UNMITIGATED ‘GOODS’. Period.

    –“Trump is not actually someone who defends Western values,”—

    A fool defends values (absolute unmitigated goods) and an empiricist defends the ‘fully accounted’ profit and loss of transactions. WHENEVER SOMEONE TALKS PRINCIPLES AND VALUES THEY”RE IGNORANT, OR LYING OR BOTH.

    —“I can’t find anything particularly “right-wing” about them—not in the American sense,”—

    Conservatism, which is a code-word for ‘aristocracy’ is Meritocratic, Truth Telling, Empirical, Rule of Law creating prosperity through the total prohibition of parasitism, and therefore the requirement for productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer free of negative externality that might in any way provoke retaliation that would impede the incentive to cooperate, engage in production, engage in trade, and deliver unto the aristocracy a commission for the imposition of such rules that limit human action to the productive. The family is the unit of reproduction and production and therefore the object of all policy – not the individual. Hence one-man, one vote. because one man for one family. Leaving the conflict between the reproductive strategies of the male and female within the family unit and external to politics. The government consists of a market wherein the different classes, possessing different interests, can engage in exchanges that produce the commons that are mutually beneficial. The judiciary functions as a sacred priesthood preserving natural law – cooperation and non-conflict. The church provides insurer of last resort, and limited pedagogy. The state (aristocracy) organizes production. The knights (servants) provide law and fight. The lower classes are constantly culled by hanging, war, and manorial control of reproduction. THAT IS THE WEST. Because that is an empirical (scientific) and non-ideological view of mankind. Rome abandoned greek philosophy for a reason. Like jewish law, it was merely a tool for lying. Roman law was purely empirical. CONSERVATISM = EMPIRICISM = SCIENTIFIC GOVERNMENT OF MANKIND. My job is to end the lies, the pseudoscience, and the fallacies of the enlightenment eras. NO MORE LIES. TRUTH BUILT THE WEST. TRUTH CAN RESTORE IT.. We are the #NewRight. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Reason Magazine’s Straw Man Attack on Trump Illustrates The Poverty Of Libertinism

    [R]eason’s Straw Men :

    RE: http://reason.com/blog/2016/04/06/the-alt-right-is-wrong-trump-is-an-enemy

    –“Some of Donald Trump’s most ardent supporters believe he is the only candidate who will defend Western culture from its enemies both foreign (illegal immigrants, Muslims) and domestic (cultural relativists, campus leftists).”—

    No, we believe he is the only candidate that will transform the administration from an ideological to an empirical one – and throw the bums out so to speak who compromise. (Ergo, straw man)

    —“The U.S. is besieged by forces that want to destroy its cultural heritage, and Trump is the only one who gets that, they say.”—

    The USA is no longer in a position to bear endless third world immigration, endless asymmetric trade relationships, and endless funding of the world police force (nato). (Ergo, straw man) (Author is relying upon psychologism which is an anti-empirical propaganda tool of Marxist Critique, not engaging in truthful debate about questions of social, economic, and political, science.)

    —“This is a terrible reason to support Trump, but not because the values of the West aren’t worth protecting—they are.”—

    Having created a straw man, that the questions are psychologisms, the author now attempts to refute his own position, not the position of trump or the people who support trump. (Again, the author is using the Common Marxist Technique of creating moral straw men in place of empirical arguments. I am well aware that most libertarian thought is in fact constructed on marxist method of argumentation for the same reasons – obscurantism, suggestion, misrepresentation. But the author is rather ‘crude’ in his application of the marxist technique.)

    —“The sad! fact is that Trump adamantly rejects two of the most important legacies of the Enlightenment and Western society: free markets and freedom of the press.”—

    Both of these ‘innovations’ were fallacies. (a) Freedom of truthful speech, and (b) freedom of markets equally free of externality would have been innovations. However, the pseudoscientific conquest of the west (by boaz, freud, marx, cantor, mises, keynes, the frankfurt school, rothbard/rand, leo strauss, and the various movement conservatives was achieved only because of the combination of free rather than truthful press, tolerance for advocacy of theft (socialism, communism), tolerance for advocacy of free riding on the commons (libertinism/libertarianism), tolerance for military expansionism (neo-conservatism, movement conservatism). And the economy was jeopardized because of the tolerance for externalities (export of knowledge, labor arbitrage trading consumption for dilution of the skill base).

    –“No presidential candidate who fails to grasp why unrestricted trade across national borders is the hallmark of a civilized society is fit to lead one, and no leader who seeks the power to shut down newspapers who criticize him can be trusted to defend classical liberalism from its enemies.”—

    No person who fails to grasp that he advocates theft from others by externality, free riding, pseudoscientific fraud, is not a hall;mark of civilized society but of SEPARATIST PARASITISM UPON THE HOST POPULATION. The cost of creating production in the voluntary organization of production (capitalism) is born by every living soul in the polity. So what the author is advocating is PRIVATIZATION OF COMMONS (theft). Period. End of argument. The secret to western success was the oath: I shall not lie or steal. Yet by engaging in propaganda the author lies (pseudoscience) and steals (advocates theft by externality and free riding).

    —“White nationalists, in Holt’s view, are misguided to the extent that they put undue importance on race. It’s the values of Western Europeans, not their skin color, that matters: “—

    This is false, and another ‘values’ psychologism.(Another Big Lie) (a) homogenous people redistribute, and heterogenous people done. (b) commons are produced by redistribution (c) commons are a competitive advantage. (d) normative commons are the most competitive advantage (e) property rights and truth telling are the most competitive normative advantages. (f) no group can produce a western high trust society with property rights and truth telling if the median IQ is below current 100 to perhaps 105. (g) The west achieved higher normative distribution of IQ, lower distribution of impulsivity and aggression, through the systematic eugenic culling of people by hanging, war, and manorial control of reproduction and food consumption. (h) ergo, race matters a great deal. It may in fact matter MOST.

    —“Trump has any standing to claim that he is “unabashedly pro-Western.” A man cannot portray himself as the defender of the Enlightenment, modern Western civilization, and classical liberalism if he is desperate to undo its crowning achievements.”—

    Falsehood. As we have shown, these are pseudoscientific frauds, not achievements. Falsehood. Western civilization is defined by meritocracy, empiricism, truth telling, and a requirement for productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, free of negative externality, because this is the only method of cooperation that (a) does not produce retaliation (b) is tolerable between kin, and (c) is non parasitic (theft). The enlightenment was a catastrophe – an exchange for aristocracy and christian mysticism for democracy and pseudoscience – tools of the leftists. It is those pseudosciences and the above listed frauds that we are undoing using empirical science today.

    —“Of course, there’s nothing particularly Western about the Dark Ages—the entire world has suffered some version of the West’s long period of tribal warfare, poverty, and repression.”—

    Falsehood. The dark ages were caused by: (a) excessive immigration into the empire. (b) the increased cost of maintaining a land empire instead of a naval empire (c) the Justinian plague made possible by the expansion of trade and the increase in population density in the core trading area (byzantium). (d) the dependence upon slave/serf labor for agrarian production. (e) the closing of the stoic schools and forcible introduction of christianity. (f) the rise of militant islam and the loss of northern african grain production, followed by the conquest of the byzantines and Sassanids (persians), thereby destroying the cycle of mediterranean trade. (g) a failure of the aristocracy to breed in sufficient numbers to maintain a professional warrior class (h) the success of the muslims in piracy and raiding causing the total collapse of the Mediterranean trade, the roman urban life, and all urban life in Europe. Urban=Market. There was no more need for Rome to fall than there was for China. China succeeded because they professionalized the military and the bureaucracy. Rome failed to. Roman Aristocracy was too diluted to reform a warrior class sufficient to offset the Muslim conquest. Thankfully the rise of the vikings, normans, and french as a consequence produced professional warriors again, which could be exported to the levant to ‘take the battle to the enemy’. Trade is only as good as the negative externalities it produces. THERE ARE NO ABSOLUTE UNMITIGATED ‘GOODS’. Period.

    –“Trump is not actually someone who defends Western values,”—

    A fool defends values (absolute unmitigated goods) and an empiricist defends the ‘fully accounted’ profit and loss of transactions. WHENEVER SOMEONE TALKS PRINCIPLES AND VALUES THEY”RE IGNORANT, OR LYING OR BOTH.

    —“I can’t find anything particularly “right-wing” about them—not in the American sense,”—

    Conservatism, which is a code-word for ‘aristocracy’ is Meritocratic, Truth Telling, Empirical, Rule of Law creating prosperity through the total prohibition of parasitism, and therefore the requirement for productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer free of negative externality that might in any way provoke retaliation that would impede the incentive to cooperate, engage in production, engage in trade, and deliver unto the aristocracy a commission for the imposition of such rules that limit human action to the productive. The family is the unit of reproduction and production and therefore the object of all policy – not the individual. Hence one-man, one vote. because one man for one family. Leaving the conflict between the reproductive strategies of the male and female within the family unit and external to politics. The government consists of a market wherein the different classes, possessing different interests, can engage in exchanges that produce the commons that are mutually beneficial. The judiciary functions as a sacred priesthood preserving natural law – cooperation and non-conflict. The church provides insurer of last resort, and limited pedagogy. The state (aristocracy) organizes production. The knights (servants) provide law and fight. The lower classes are constantly culled by hanging, war, and manorial control of reproduction. THAT IS THE WEST. Because that is an empirical (scientific) and non-ideological view of mankind. Rome abandoned greek philosophy for a reason. Like jewish law, it was merely a tool for lying. Roman law was purely empirical. CONSERVATISM = EMPIRICISM = SCIENTIFIC GOVERNMENT OF MANKIND. My job is to end the lies, the pseudoscience, and the fallacies of the enlightenment eras. NO MORE LIES. TRUTH BUILT THE WEST. TRUTH CAN RESTORE IT.. We are the #NewRight. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • I Am Almost Guaranteed to Offend You At Some Point

    [G]UARANTEED OFFENDER I am guaranteed to offend almost everyone. Why? Because to the last, just like all other people, you start with some axiomatic principle that you hold dear, but which is false. We are all rational actors. Saints and sinners all. The question is not how we have been in the past, but what we choose to be in the future. Truth is not merciful to our creature comforts. It is however, the most empowering method of choosing our actions that we can make use of.

  • Libertarianism Uses Marxist Argumentation To Deceive by Suggestion

     [N]on-descriptive definitions are part of the reason for the failure of libertarianism. With descriptive definitions rather than vague obscurantist “principles” the philosophical vacuousness of the movement is readily exposed. The reason these debates still occur, and the reason this article is just one of thousands of similar pretentions is the fact that the NAP is untestable. And as I have argued, it is untestable just as dialectical materialism is untestable: to allow for individual interpretation of scope of that which can be aggressed upon, and therefore creates a false consensus. NAP sounds meaningful to many but because it’s an incomplete sentence, it leaves the object of aggression substitutable by each individual. AS SUCH NAP IS MORALLY RELATIVE since each person interprets the scope to which aggression must be limited differently. Yet, to form a voluntary polity, one cannot posses moral relativity. The problem with any such polity is (a) whether it is a rational choice versus competing polities and (b) whether it is possible to sustain competition from within such a polity, and (c) whether such a polity would be tolerated by neighboring polities. )
    The NAP is just another variation on dialectical materialism or the labor theory of value. It’s another bit of pseudoscientific nonsense. one does not determine that which is “right” – others do. One determines what is right by whether or not others retaliate against you for it. Walter Bock and Murray Rothbard’s ancestors practiced the NAP in the wildlands and ghettos of eastern europe, and were almost always exterminated or outcast for it. And it is probably the reason why the polity was never able to functionally produce the commons that were necessary for the defense of and holding of territory. The only liberty that is existentially possible is that which prohibits retaliation, because it is the need for costly that causes demand for the state. Period. End of story. Individual moral choice is a lie. Morality is empirically determined by the value of cooperation and the cost of retaliation. But it is a cognitive bias, probably born of developmental defect that causes people to become attracted to libertarianism in order to claim to determine morality on their own, of their own choice, rather than out of necessity. And why? Because as outcasts the desire to escape payment for normative and physical commons is a rational reaction to obtaining less value from the commons than one is required to pay in costs.
  • Libertarianism Uses Marxist Argumentation To Deceive by Suggestion

     [N]on-descriptive definitions are part of the reason for the failure of libertarianism. With descriptive definitions rather than vague obscurantist “principles” the philosophical vacuousness of the movement is readily exposed. The reason these debates still occur, and the reason this article is just one of thousands of similar pretentions is the fact that the NAP is untestable. And as I have argued, it is untestable just as dialectical materialism is untestable: to allow for individual interpretation of scope of that which can be aggressed upon, and therefore creates a false consensus. NAP sounds meaningful to many but because it’s an incomplete sentence, it leaves the object of aggression substitutable by each individual. AS SUCH NAP IS MORALLY RELATIVE since each person interprets the scope to which aggression must be limited differently. Yet, to form a voluntary polity, one cannot posses moral relativity. The problem with any such polity is (a) whether it is a rational choice versus competing polities and (b) whether it is possible to sustain competition from within such a polity, and (c) whether such a polity would be tolerated by neighboring polities. )
    The NAP is just another variation on dialectical materialism or the labor theory of value. It’s another bit of pseudoscientific nonsense. one does not determine that which is “right” – others do. One determines what is right by whether or not others retaliate against you for it. Walter Bock and Murray Rothbard’s ancestors practiced the NAP in the wildlands and ghettos of eastern europe, and were almost always exterminated or outcast for it. And it is probably the reason why the polity was never able to functionally produce the commons that were necessary for the defense of and holding of territory. The only liberty that is existentially possible is that which prohibits retaliation, because it is the need for costly that causes demand for the state. Period. End of story. Individual moral choice is a lie. Morality is empirically determined by the value of cooperation and the cost of retaliation. But it is a cognitive bias, probably born of developmental defect that causes people to become attracted to libertarianism in order to claim to determine morality on their own, of their own choice, rather than out of necessity. And why? Because as outcasts the desire to escape payment for normative and physical commons is a rational reaction to obtaining less value from the commons than one is required to pay in costs.