Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • He has taken on postmoderns on their terms, and done them more damage than our c

    … He has taken on postmoderns on their terms, and done them more damage than our conservative caste has in decades trying.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-26 06:18:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/735716691947048960

    Reply addressees: @charlesmurray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/734446452034916352


    IN REPLY TO:

    @charlesmurray

    I would have thought it impossible: a. fresh take on Don & Hill. https://t.co/YBzwVzCHgF

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/734446452034916352

  • Yeah, but try writing formal arguments in tweets. Sure, only .05% of FB is worth

    Yeah, but try writing formal arguments in tweets. Sure, only .05% of FB is worthy. But what % of Twitter? (Sigh.)


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-26 06:10:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/735714601396899841

    Reply addressees: @davidefish @charlesmurray

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/735447597549158400


    IN REPLY TO:

    @davidefish

    @charlesmurray Twitter seems like Mensa compared to Facebook.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/735447597549158400

  • The New York Times (@nytimes): Peter Thiel, tech billionaire, reveals secret war

    http://twitter.com/nytimes/status/735690955362181120/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=735736073058291712Retweeted The New York Times (@nytimes):

    Peter Thiel, tech billionaire, reveals secret war with Gawker https://t.co/lOYY3wc84E https://t.co/YP0ED4SFuP


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-26 03:35:00 UTC

  • temporal syntax would have required two more characters. But then, you weren’t r

    temporal syntax would have required two more characters. But then, you weren’t really criticizing that were you? 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-25 14:49:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/735482972682457089

    Reply addressees: @thecoffeemonkey

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/735472563556483072


    IN REPLY TO:

    @thecoffeemonkey

    @curtdoolittle how can he be on the wrong side of something that hasn’t happened yet?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/735472563556483072

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-25 06:26:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-25 05:54:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-25 05:50:00 UTC

  • GETS ON BOARD WITH THE REASON —The neofascist reaction, the force behind Trump

    http://www.salon.com/2016/05/23/donald_trump_is_going_to_win_this_is_why_hillary_clinton_cant_defeat_what_trump_represents/SALON GETS ON BOARD WITH THE REASON

    —The neofascist reaction, the force behind Trump, has come about because of the extreme disembeddedness of the economy from social relations. The neoliberal economy has become pure abstraction; as has the market, as has the state, there is no reality to any of these things the way we have classically understood them. Americans, like people everywhere rising up against neoliberal globalization (in Britain, for example, this takes the form of Brexit, or exit from the European Union), want a return of social relations, or embeddedness, to the economy.—


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-24 06:28:00 UTC

  • THIS ARTICLE A DISINGENUOUS JOURNALISTIC JUSTIFICATIONISM WITH A HEAVY DOSE OF P

    http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/article79165287.html#fmpIS THIS ARTICLE A DISINGENUOUS JOURNALISTIC JUSTIFICATIONISM WITH A HEAVY DOSE OF PSYCHOLOGISM THROWN IN FOR EXTRA MEASURE?

    People don’t like or trust the Clintons

    1) Hillary-care vs Obama-care. We still hold her responsible for the first failure as much as we will soon hold Obama accountable for the second: imposing controls on our largest industry against the will of the voters.

    2) Clinton-era devolution of the military. Against the will of the voters.

    3) Dead Soldiers. Did we say “Dead Soldiers?” Did we say lying about dead soldiers? Against the will of the voters.

    4) The Clinton Foundation’s behavior. (I have personal experience – they lied and stole 2M from my company)

    5) Tolerating a husband’s serial-sex-predator problems. And not honestly addressing it.

    6) “More of the Same Policy” instead of the end of empire-under-the-rubric of-globalism.

    7) Racial and Minority Pandering in an era where the parties represent racial divides.

    8) The most scandalous presidency on record – and she covered for it.

    9) Taking credit for 1990’s economy which was entirely the result of the end of world socialism and the universal adoption of consumer capitalism.

    10) Did we say ‘flagrant disregard for the rule of law, and a failure to come clean, apologize, and correct the behavior”.

    11) Total absence of any creativity, innovation, policy, to address the current world and domestic stresses.

    12) The backing of wall street, which is no longer providing a necessary function of distributing physical currency, or marshaling hard-money-credit in an economy of digital currency created from the issuance of shares in the economy: what we call fiat money.

    13) The boomers killed america. She’s a typical lower middle class boomer social climber, and she bears every unlikeable property of her generation.

    Our rule of law is sacred. Our Truthfulness in speech is sacred. Our military and our soldiers are sacred. Our marriages and our families are sacred. And the presidency functions as the sacred moral steward of the country. But, what does sacred mean? It means that no matter what good we wish to achieve in private or the commons we may not violate those rules in achieving it – because our ability to create those commons

    She has no respect for the sacred. And so we have no respect for her.

    She’s a professional pandering, Boomer politician. A product of the postmodern anti-scientific, ant-rational, anti-moral generation.

    She represents all that is sick with our nation.

    Of course she is not trusted, disliked, and by some, openly despised.

    Because she’s deserving of it.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-24 05:23:00 UTC

  • One cannot buy indulgences from either the church to enter heaven, or academy to

    One cannot buy indulgences from either the church to enter heaven, or academy to enter the upper middle class. Sorry. #libertarian #newright


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-23 19:19:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/734826179505586176