Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • “The peculiarity of philosophy in Italy is, with minor exceptions, an endless ta

    —“The peculiarity of philosophy in Italy is, with minor exceptions, an endless target practice with the object of refining some aspects of German classical idealism, or else the re-hashing of themes from the philosophy of the ‘schools’ in quasi Thomistic ways.‘”—

    interesting positioning. I tend to read only the aristocratic italian writers and I see them as only sligthly sentimental empiricists. So perhaps I read only the scientific wing (those that descend from machhieavelli). But it occurs to me that while french love deceit and subtlety, and germans abstract obfuscation, the italians are less trusting and their philosophy more skeptical, if beautiful.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-01 01:46:00 UTC

  • Calling it a debate rather than an exercise in the art of Shaming and Rallying i

    Calling it a debate rather than an exercise in the art of Shaming and Rallying is kind of gilding the pig pen.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-31 16:43:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/737685905633345537

    Reply addressees: @mattyglesias

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/737685060153966593


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/737685060153966593

  • Never ceases to amaze me how the room temperature IQ crowd raspberries at concep

    Never ceases to amaze me how the room temperature IQ crowd raspberries at concepts that they are too ignorant to grasp yet are so easily drawn in by pseudoscience, ratio-babble, and psychobabble.

    Then I realise that males are as stupid as females when it comes to being fooled by appealing nonsense arguments. And that all that differs between idiot feminism and idiot libertarianism is the flavour of the carrot and the material of the stick.

    Women want to be free of exclusion and men want to be free of the admission of powerlessness. Both seek to be free of the obviousness of their dependence upon their betters.

    So women and men seek comforting lies to help them grasp at the frail straw of self confidence.

    Libertinism or feminism the result is the same: seeking excuse for reproductive undesirability.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-31 15:11:00 UTC

  • RESPONSE TO TOM WOODS SPEECH TO LIBERTARIANS. I love you Tom, but we have two ov

    RESPONSE TO TOM WOODS SPEECH TO LIBERTARIANS.

    I love you Tom, but we have two over invested generations alive today grasping at the straws of the hippie generation promise of libertarian communes.

    But Liberty and sovereignty have only been constructed and only can be constructed by the organised use of violence to prohibit the alternatives.

    Wishful thinking will die with the generation of over invested wishful thinkers – buried by the empirical evidence that Liberty, personal responsibility under Liberty, and the costly use of violence to obtain and hold that Liberty, is the desire of but a few.

    And so called libertarians may desire Liberty, may willingly carry the individual responsibility, but when it comes to paying the high cost of using violence to obtain and hold Liberty, they run away from that cost as rapidly as socialist run away from individual responsibility.

    So I see no difference between wishful thinking by socialists on the economy and personal responsibility, and wishful thinking by so called libertarians on the government and the high cost of violence needed to secure Liberty.

    Both are acts of fraud using moral pretence to attempt to excuse the payment of a cost necessary to obtain their desires.

    Fraud is fraud no matter what moral pretence it is wrapped in

    That socialist will fight, but not compete in the market. The libertarian will compete in the market but not fight.

    The conservative will both fight and compete in the market and bear the cost of norms and laws that place the inter generational family ahead of the temporal individual.

    As far as I can see conservatives are the only people willing to pay the cost of Liberty: normative, economic and military.

    Everyone else is a fraud.

    Curt Doolittle.

    The Propertarian Institute.

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-31 14:51:00 UTC

  • it wasn’t surviving the neocons or movement conservatives either. I can define t

    it wasn’t surviving the neocons or movement conservatives either. I can define the term. Can you? #Newright


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-31 14:45:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/737656354559660032

    Reply addressees: @weeklystandard @McCormackJohn

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/736561922141749248


    IN REPLY TO:

    @weeklystandard

    Can Social Conservatism Survive Trump? https://t.co/V97JXYmdgB @mccormackjohn https://t.co/ROoeaveyQR

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/736561922141749248

  • VIA TWITTER @business @StephanieBodoni 1) The major opposition players (national

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-31/tech-giants-vow-to-tackle-online-hate-speech-within-24-hoursRESPONSE VIA TWITTER

    @business @StephanieBodoni

    1) The major opposition players (nationalists) are launching same services in response to mainstream(universalists)

    2) So what FB/T/G/MS will do by this is actually make a MARKET FOR NATIONALIST PLATFORMS.

    3) China and Russia started opposition tech for national reasons, but the writing is on the wall – it’s spreading.

    4) There is NOTHING in Twitter, FB, Google, MS tech that is not cheaply replicable, and only defended by US IP laws.

    5) So the more the ‘new church’ of commercial universalism tries to clamp down, the more the opposition is funded.

    6) There is nothing irrational about groupishness, tribalism or nationalism. Its universalism that’s the outlier.

    7) The smarter answer is to isolate groups not fund opposition groups by censorship.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-31 12:12:00 UTC

  • Response To Tom Woods Speech To Libertarians

    I love you Tom, but we have two over invested generations alive today grasping at the straws of the hippie generation promise of libertarian communes. But Liberty and sovereignty have only been constructed and only can be constructed by the organised use of violence to prohibit the alternatives.

    Wishful thinking will die with the generation of over invested wishful thinkers – buried by the empirical evidence that Liberty, personal responsibility under Liberty, and the costly use of violence to obtain and hold that Liberty, is the desire of but a few. And so called libertarians may desire Liberty, may willingly carry the individual responsibility, but when it comes to paying the high cost of using violence to obtain and hold Liberty, they run away from that cost as rapidly as socialist run away from individual responsibility. So I see no difference between wishful thinking by socialists on the economy and personal responsibility, and wishful thinking by so called libertarians on the government and the high cost of violence needed to secure Liberty. Both are acts of fraud using moral pretence to attempt to excuse the payment of a cost necessary to obtain their desires. Fraud is fraud no matter what moral pretence it is wrapped in That socialist will fight, but not compete in the market. The libertarian will compete in the market but not fight. The conservative will both fight and compete in the market and bear the cost of norms and laws that place the inter generational family ahead of the temporal individual. As far as I can see conservatives are the only people willing to pay the cost of Liberty: normative, economic and military. Everyone else is a fraud. Curt Doolittle. The Propertarian Institute. Kiev, Ukraine.
  • Response To Tom Woods Speech To Libertarians

    I love you Tom, but we have two over invested generations alive today grasping at the straws of the hippie generation promise of libertarian communes. But Liberty and sovereignty have only been constructed and only can be constructed by the organised use of violence to prohibit the alternatives.

    Wishful thinking will die with the generation of over invested wishful thinkers – buried by the empirical evidence that Liberty, personal responsibility under Liberty, and the costly use of violence to obtain and hold that Liberty, is the desire of but a few. And so called libertarians may desire Liberty, may willingly carry the individual responsibility, but when it comes to paying the high cost of using violence to obtain and hold Liberty, they run away from that cost as rapidly as socialist run away from individual responsibility. So I see no difference between wishful thinking by socialists on the economy and personal responsibility, and wishful thinking by so called libertarians on the government and the high cost of violence needed to secure Liberty. Both are acts of fraud using moral pretence to attempt to excuse the payment of a cost necessary to obtain their desires. Fraud is fraud no matter what moral pretence it is wrapped in That socialist will fight, but not compete in the market. The libertarian will compete in the market but not fight. The conservative will both fight and compete in the market and bear the cost of norms and laws that place the inter generational family ahead of the temporal individual. As far as I can see conservatives are the only people willing to pay the cost of Liberty: normative, economic and military. Everyone else is a fraud. Curt Doolittle. The Propertarian Institute. Kiev, Ukraine.
  • Of the three orders Priestly/Public-Intellectual, Commercial/Financial, Martial/

    Of the three orders Priestly/Public-Intellectual, Commercial/Financial, Martial/Judicial, which lies more than the others?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-31 05:21:00 UTC

  • LOVE THIS STUFF

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3616170/Putin-s-youth-army-Russian-strongman-sets-Soviet-style-pioneer-scheme-schoolchildren-faces-web-claim-s-echo-HITLER.htmlI LOVE THIS STUFF


    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-31 01:29:00 UTC