Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

YES, ROTHBARDIAN LIBERTARIANS ARE MARXISTS, BUT ARYAN LIBERTARIANS ARE JUST THE OPPOSITE.

( important piece )

I suppose it’s difficult for Rothbardian Libertines to face the harsh reality that their narrative relies upon the Jewish and Marxist fallacy that man was oppressed by his rulers rather than domesticated out of animal barbarism through constant culling of malcontents, parasites, and the unproductive.

If you are a Rothbardian libertarian you must de facto be a Marxist, whether you ascribe to the socialist economic model or the libertine economic model is actually irrelevant.

The economic model is merely a reflection of class reproductive needs, or demographic constituency – two terms which are synonyms reflecting only the difference between subjective desire and objective causality.

The Jews gave us the comforting fallacy of victim hood in the forms of communism, libertinism, and neoconservatism.

The aryans gave us the uncomfortable truths of nature worship hero worship, and the sacredness of family, Aristotelianism, sovereign rule of law between warrior heads of households, and heroism in the contribution to the commons as duty and status.

The truth is uncomfortable but simple.

Eradicate parasitism and save surpluses in the commons and you will, over the long term, defeat all opponents.

The only source of Liberty is the organised application of violence to suppress all parasitism.

First by centralising local rents as taxation necessary to create the moral order we call Liberty.

Second by suppressing all rents from the central order, by incremental replacement with competitions – just as we suppressed local parasitism through competition.

Then leaving nothing but rule of law, a market for commons prohibiting consumption, and a market for consumption prohibiting parasitism by the commons.

This is the most rational, logical, scientific form of government available to man.

Every other kind requires deceit.

Which is why every other civilisation and every government within each civilisation relied upon deceit.

The west discovered and benefitted from uncomfortable technologies of truth, testimony, sovereignty and property. Despite their high cost.

We have exchanged the high normative cost of truth, testimony, sovereignty and property for the high material cost of taxation, loss of rule of law, loss of Liberty, loss of sovereignty, loss of family, loss of tribe and race, and loss of civilisation.

In retrospect we have made very bad exchange.

Thankfully with truth and violence we can correct it.