Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • THIS KIND OF PERSON. —“Blokhin was one of the most vile human beings in histor

    THIS KIND OF PERSON.

    —“Blokhin was one of the most vile human beings in history. He was a Soviet officer during World War Two. After Russia and Germany carved up Poland at the start of the war, about 10,000 Polish officers were sent to an internment camp in the Katyn forest. Blokhin then eliminated most of them. He not only gave the orders but also personally carried out the executions, every night for 28 consecutive days.

    Prisoners were led to a basement chamber, where Blokhin waited for them. His leather executioner’s gear: Long gloves, a butcher’s apron, and a hat. Without a trial, a sentence, or any official procedure, guards held down each prisoner while Blokhin shot him in the back of the head. Guards then removed the body, hosed down the floor, and led in the next victim. Blokhin killed one POW every three minutes. It’s the most prolific and efficient mass murder by a single person in world history.

    Stalin decorated Blokhin for his work. He lived through the war into the 1950s, falling out of favor after Stalin’s death. He suffered from depression and alcoholism, and died in 1955. The official cause was suicide. When the mass graves were discovered in the Katyn forest in 1943, Russia blamed the Nazis, only admitting guilt in 1990. Neither Blokhin nor anyone else was ever brought to trial for the massacre.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-25 12:29:00 UTC

  • yep

    yep


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-24 10:09:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/779623742280437760

    Reply addressees: @Alrenous @Outsideness

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/779612604717146113


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Alrenous

    @Outsideness @curtdoolittle
    Templars bank -> get ‘kicked out’ in a sense.
    Then Jews take over -> get kicked out.
    Banking is the commonality.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/779612604717146113

  • Just wanted to leave a note that I feel very lucky to know you, hear your perspe

    Just wanted to leave a note that I feel very lucky to know you, hear your perspective, appreciate your open mind, and I always look forward to what you have to say. Thanks for sharing the planet. 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-23 10:16:00 UTC

  • NOT INCLUDED IN THE LIST OF ALT RIGHT-ERS? I THINK THAT”S A GOOD THING. 🙂 ( ) 1

    http://www.counter-currents.com/2016/09/the-caste-system-of-the-alt-right/I’M NOT INCLUDED IN THE LIST OF ALT RIGHT-ERS? I THINK THAT”S A GOOD THING. 🙂

    ( http://www.counter-currents.com/2016/09/the-caste-system-of-the-alt-right/ )

    1) I don’t know whether to be thrilled or hurt by not being included in this list. 🙂 I think… I think maybe … that I like it. 🙂

    2) I wrote a similar list a few weeks ago. <a href=”https://propertarianism.wordpress.com/2016/09/23/the-new-right-class-structures/”>The New “Right” Class Structures</a> But I organized it by argumentative structure. Given our differences in abilities, we tend to argue differently at about every 10 points of IQ (with significant overlap). This division corresponds to both social and occupational classes as well as IQ. And I placed people in the alt-right given their method of argument. Which of course some people found insulting. But just as the English language contains three sets of terms: german for the lower class, french for the ruling class, and latin for the intellectual class, all political movements use a different language and argumentative method for every caste or class. (expressive, ridicule, moral justification, rational/historical justification, ratio-empirical-correspondence, and institutional. (And I consider myself in the NEW RIGHT rather than ALT RIGHT – for this reason: class argument method.) So view the world as the outgoing ‘hopeful’ old right(political). The resigned alt right(cultural). The traditional right in transition(religio-familial). The New Right (scientific-institutional).

    3) And, I do understand why I am not included in this post’s list:

    (a) I view the world as abandoning the 20th century battle between feminine universalism(socialism) and its paternal opponent masculine particularism(fascism), and that worldwide all groups are returning to Nationalism and Tribalism – in recognition of the failure of the anglo-contractual-commercial-universalism, and Jewish socialism-libertarian-neo-conservatism (ie: puritans and jews). And that we are just like everyone else – trying to reassert our traditional history now that the ‘market’ has been maximized by the universal adoption of consumer credit capitalism worldwide.

    (b) I blame us (whites) for not manning the fortress Europa , not those who have succeeded in breaching our walls – it is after all, the purpose of competition, and we are losing because we are lazy and unwilling to fight.

    (c) I spend my time worrying about institutional solutions, not trying to appease my bruised ego by ridiculing the wildlife for merely being wildlife. The scorpion DOES kill the frog before they get to the other side of the stream. Only a fool trusts the scorpion to act against its nature.

    So:

    i) Nationalism is for everyone, not just us. And anyone that it’s not for, is someone to be exterminated as a threat to the rest, not just us – to mankind.

    ii) We must fight, and stop talking as if we will win a democratic election. Hillary is just the Left’s Dole: the next anointed apparatchik available in a weak field of options.

    iii) We need a solution to fight for that restores our walls, and a process of transition, and a process of disrupting the economy and government such that surrender is obtained rather than ongoing hardship.

    CLOSING

    The alt-right is still a working-class and lower middle-class movement. because that’s where all the disenfranchised males are. And disenfranchised males are the only people who matter in creating a revolution. Unfortunately, the alt right has no answers to offer and is just a resistance movement.

    But Resistance is insufficient for revolution. Rebellion is insufficient for Rule. Criticism is insufficient for proposing a solution. And a solution is necessary to coordinate action. Instead we must have a solution to demand, a plan of transition, and a plan by which to demand our solution.

    The alt right is succeeding by adopting the methods of the Marxist/Socialist/Feminist/cultural-Marxists: poison the virtue signals of the opponents and make their status signals a worthless commodity. It’s working. And all we had to do was give up our ‘honor’ to do it. But once that’s done – “What’ch ya’ got there sonny?” Nothin’.

    Necessary does not mean sufficient. The Alt right is necessary but insufficient. That’s where others come in. And that combination of ALT-RIGHT(Culture/aesthetics), TRAD-RIGHT(Ethics and Family), and NEW-RIGHT(institutions), will be what provides the full compliment of classes necessary to change the power structures.

    But, in the end. “We gotta’ fight.”

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    L’viv Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-23 03:06:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.quora.com/Why-does-the-1-7-Jewish-population-in-USA-have-so-much-political-power/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv&share=eb0b9e37

    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-23 02:01:00 UTC

  • WHITES IN SPORTS (responding to: ) DISAGREE : We just frame the observation inco

    http://www.counter-currents.com/2016/09/on-whites-and-fighting/ON WHITES IN SPORTS

    (responding to:

    http://www.counter-currents.com/2016/09/on-whites-and-fighting/

    )

    DISAGREE : We just frame the observation incorrectly.

    1) White men excel (dominate in war) because of how we act in GROUPS of individuals. Even the legendary quote that one Spartan is the equal of any other warrior, but together they are unequalled. The reason we do excel is something that we are just beginning to understand, but it appears to be a)lower impulsivity/higher calm, b) cultural indoctrination into indo european heroism c) our ability to spatially model groups – or better yet, to operate as a pack – this last one I am trying to find more research on, d) militia training or experience from youth with the expectation of war, and lastly e) what appears to be an iq advantage in our professional warrior class.

    2) The races can easily be stacked by degrees of sexual maturity – and degree of sexual maturity is second only to scale of class distributions in determining demonstrated racial differences. Asians lowest, whites second, black haired peoples third, and Africans highest. It is illogical to assume that we will not pay a price for our ‘domestication’. But we hold the ‘upper middle’ in both degree of sexual maturity, and balance of spatial vs verbal intellectual ability. The east Asians lack our verbal ability and they are by far the least sexually mature people (I have theories on that – since I’m pretty sure it’s selection of females that determines that trend, and greater immaturity was preferable(necessary) in the mongoloids than in the whites to create a similar behavior in male selection of females. All that interesting info said, Asians obtain longer life spans. Blacks obtain greater physical tolerance for damage, and require less nurture for shorter periods of time – both suitable for a low IQ population in a hostile environment. These small differences contribute significantly to the in-progress speciation of the races after we exterminated the previous human species. So blacks pay for their superior speed and strength far more so than we pay for our less superior speed and strength by gaining lower impulsivity, better organization, better use of weapons. (You don’t see that many black swordsmen either). So we have simple sports (basketball, weightlifting, and boxing) and we have complex sports (fencing, quarterbacking, and strategy games), and we are just not paying attention to how important the complex sports are in which we excel.

    3) Competitive sport in the west was generally for fitness (among militia and soldiers) and gambling (among militia and soldiers), and most often between men of similar abilities. (even judicial duels had to be reasonably ‘fair’ matches. But this sport does not demonstrate how we do in war. Empirical evidence does. (Black logistics, white special-forces, and officers.) So our physical fitness was (like Swiss men today) a property of our ‘everyone fights for the franchise’ system of enfranchisement. So the purpose of such fighting was in-group improvement of the group, not testing against outgroups. So we are ‘testing’ for the wrong thing. We’re running an indifferent test of the lower castes and judging ourselves against a false measure. Put 100 white men with weapons aginst 100 of anyone else and that’s the difference in our abilities. I would counter that the problem is that cheap sports are physically advantageous and expensive sports with lots of equipment are expensive. In real terms football is analogous a bunch of underclass peasants protecting the king (quarterback). (Conversely we do the same thing when competing with Jews. If we ‘stuck together’ like they do we would end their ability to employ the female reproductive strategy against us: shame, rally, divide, conquer, and siphon resources.)

    CLOSING

    So I suggest we remember WHO AND WHAT WE ARE: Spartans, Romans, Germans, Vikings. And we need to f_uck the Athenians/Venetians/Spanish/French/English and their effeminate pretenses.

    Rule or be ruled. We invented aristocratic egalitarianism: equality in sovereignty for those who fight.

    Let’s get back into legions and fight.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-23 01:46:00 UTC

  • Why are you propagandising advocacy of violence?

    Why are you propagandising advocacy of violence?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-22 13:00:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/778941920110321668

    Reply addressees: @lemonadeag @leaveitout @FebV57 @LibertarianQn @AC360 @seanhannity @BretBaier @ncnaacp

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/778849051085119488


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/778849051085119488

  • Equate job violence with wilful violence?

    Equate job violence with wilful violence?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-22 12:58:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/778941660281667584

    Reply addressees: @lemonadeag @simple_visions @leaveitout @FebV57 @LibertarianQn @AC360 @seanhannity @BretBaier

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/778850471465267201


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/778850471465267201

  • why are you making excuses for them?

    why are you making excuses for them?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-22 12:57:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/778941331095875584

    Reply addressees: @lemonadeag @AlephActual @_kenny_d @LibertarianQn @AC360 @seanhannity @BretBaier @ncnaacp @PettyIdol

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/778850278929870849


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/778850278929870849

  • There are no averages or excuses for such acts

    There are no averages or excuses for such acts


    Source date (UTC): 2016-09-22 12:57:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/778941239697764352

    Reply addressees: @lemonadeag @simple_visions @leaveitout @FebV57 @LibertarianQn @AC360 @seanhannity @BretBaier

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/778850471465267201


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/778850471465267201