Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

ok…. it’s not fair to ask me to educate you this much. So I’m going to move on

ok…. it’s not fair to ask me to educate you this much. So I’m going to move on and suggest you just follow.

Source date (UTC): 2016-11-13 23:16:47 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797941308832747520

Reply addressees: @ThisMachin

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797940386995896322

IN REPLY TO:

@ThisMachin

@curtdoolittle even in our modern world, people rarely directly deal with markets. They usually go to distribution centers.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797940386995896322

November 13, 2016
Normal people? That’s called special pleading. so now you’re making excuses, not

Normal people? That’s called special pleading. so now you’re making excuses, not just relying on terms you don’t understand.

Source date (UTC): 2016-11-13 21:53:02 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797920229892427776

Reply addressees: @ThisMachin

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797919794401939456

IN REPLY TO:

@ThisMachin

@curtdoolittle roles are part of contract, like other property.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797919794401939456

November 13, 2016
terms = premises. libertarianism is a set of lies that take advantage of impreci

terms = premises. libertarianism is a set of lies that take advantage of imprecise terms, people who are fooled by them.

Source date (UTC): 2016-11-13 21:49:35 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797919362711592960

Reply addressees: @ThisMachin

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797916020270776320

IN REPLY TO:

@ThisMachin

@curtdoolittle I am very familiar with Libertarian ideas about this . We can start conversation at a hight level. Or we can read Webster.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797916020270776320

November 13, 2016
So far you can’t define terms or construct an argument. Do both and then rationa

So far you can’t define terms or construct an argument. Do both and then rational discourse is possible. Otherwise, bullsh–.

Source date (UTC): 2016-11-13 21:24:41 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797913098153668608

Reply addressees: @ThisMachin

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797910555281399808

IN REPLY TO:

@ThisMachin

@curtdoolittle I think you had a traditional, fact-free, economics education. It’s not your fault really.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797910555281399808

November 13, 2016
If you can find another living soul with a deeper understanding I am happy to de

If you can find another living soul with a deeper understanding I am happy to debate that person. But I know them. Won’t happen.

Source date (UTC): 2016-11-13 21:21:38 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797912331187433472

Reply addressees: @ThisMachin

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797910555281399808

IN REPLY TO:

@ThisMachin

@curtdoolittle I think you had a traditional, fact-free, economics education. It’s not your fault really.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797910555281399808

November 13, 2016
“Each party has their own wing of kulaks. Ours are just more interesting.”—Mur

—“Each party has their own wing of kulaks. Ours are just more interesting.”—Murray Sell

Source date (UTC): 2016-11-13 15:57:00 UTC

November 13, 2016
RT @Gunnar_Thor: RT If You think that President Trump should put George Soros on

RT @Gunnar_Thor: RT If You think that President Trump should put George Soros on the FBI Most Wanted list!

#MAGA https://t.co/srIXfLPDyW

Source date (UTC): 2016-11-12 07:28:46 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797340342173532160

November 12, 2016
and then there are those of us who use hyperbole and humor to illustrate points.

and then there are those of us who use hyperbole and humor to illustrate points. 🙂

Source date (UTC): 2016-11-12 04:59:28 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797302771510870016

Reply addressees: @BrendanHegarty3

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797297368412647424

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797297368412647424

November 12, 2016
are you female? Because I thought only chicks couldn’t distinguish a flat line f

are you female? Because I thought only chicks couldn’t distinguish a flat line from a distribution. (sorry. had to say it)

Source date (UTC): 2016-11-12 04:34:05 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797296385200623616

Reply addressees: @BrendanHegarty3

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797295182798589952

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797295182798589952

November 12, 2016
AA?

AA?

Source date (UTC): 2016-11-12 04:09:40 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797290240394350592

Reply addressees: @SamuelStringman

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797283876410273792

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797283876410273792

November 12, 2016