EURO-PUSSY EXAMPLE OF THE DAY
—“I have been on exercises with Danish troops who stopped working at 1700hrs. Military life does not work like that and war does not fit into a 9-5 schedule.”—
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-21 19:04:00 UTC
EURO-PUSSY EXAMPLE OF THE DAY
—“I have been on exercises with Danish troops who stopped working at 1700hrs. Military life does not work like that and war does not fit into a 9-5 schedule.”—
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-21 19:04:00 UTC
Retweeted Roman Skaskiw (@Roman_Skaskiw):
A ruined generation. Unproductive, dependent, 30-yo children taught to see their petty problems as equivalent to history’s great calamities.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-21 04:15:00 UTC
Retweeted Sanguine (@SanguineEmpiric):
@SanguineEmpiric even though he was among most immoral men of all time. Thank god for Bohm-Bawerk.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-21 04:11:00 UTC
HEIRARCHY OF MYTHOLOGICAL INFANTILISMS
—“Serious post time: who is worse, adult Harry Potter fans, or adult Doctor Who fans?”—-
Harry potter is an adolescent chick cross dressing as a boy reveling in the luxury of attention that all chicks want, but almost never get, while pretending that she doesn’t want it.
Doctor Who is a traumatized beta cuck that’s seeking salvation by reaching for every life raft of every kind that he can find.
Manga (Japanese animation) is probably the worst of them.
Superheroes less so.
The ancient myths less so.
The great adventure novels less so.
The lives of the great men less so.
I’d have to say that while I love the series, HP is far worse, but that if you cannot incrementally graduate from each then you are simply infantilized by the mythos that you intuitionistically appeal to. So I would focus on explaining to children that damsels in distress get killed – they aren’t saved by friends, relatives, teachers, and magic.
A real harry potter would be dead in the first book.
HIERARCHY:
– Infant Stories.
– Children’s Stories
– Manga (asiatic myths are infantile)
– Harry potter / Dr Who (late childhood)
– Fantasy (moral responsibility)
– European Mythology (resistance to the lies of the east)
– Science Fiction (restated mythology)
– The great adventure novels
– The lives of the greats
– The story of history
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-20 10:27:00 UTC
Prefer carbines. Always preferred the even smaller the MP5 actually. Love the feel of the bullpups. I have an fn2000, but the aug/tavor/f90 are superior by far. the 416 piston design fixes the main reliability problem of the M4/AR15. The AK’s 8 dumb parts make it hard to argue with, but it feels like you’re luggin a box of rocks. Sure, we all have our preferences. I can point the bullpups most naturally, and the MP5 feels like it’s part of my body. And Im a little partial to maintaining sight picture, so that’s why I love the MP5/M4/AR15, except I HATE the charging handle. I love the bullpups for quickly pointing with a dot sight. But in the end, the MP5 has distance and accuracy but not the drill power. The M4 with the upgraded piston, still lets you drill someone through a wall, carry a shitload of rounds, and reach out and touch someone with little weight. and for all the value of the bullpups in comfort and pointability they problem is that they have a lot of parts to maintain.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 20:46:00 UTC
https://wallethub.com/edu/best-state-capitals/19030/#main-findingsHARTFORD IS THE WORST CAPITAL CITY IN AMERICA
https://wallethub.com/edu/best-state-capitals/19030/#main-findings
Everyone knows it. What a sh-t hole.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 19:24:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 18:40:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 18:39:00 UTC
https://fee.org/articles/10-reasons-to-rethink-the-narrative-about-trump-s-success/TUCKER SHIFTS (FINALLY). 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 18:37:00 UTC
—“I can remember you saying you’d position yourself right of Hoppe though, lol”— Roy Van de Weteringh
Yeah, well, Hoppe, as a german, and an academic, has german intuitions. As an american, and an englishman, and an entrepreneur and a social scientist, I have different intuitions: man is rational and predation is rational.
So it’s more accurate to say that I am more INTOLERANT of violations than Hoppe, and Hoppe is more INTOLERANT of violations than Rothbard.
The reason being that I see the accumulation of consequences cheaply produced as insurmountable by competition, whereas he sees competition as producing sufficient value that negative consequences can be defeated. And Rothbard either ignores the accumulation of consequences, or sees the destructive consequences as a ‘good’ war against the white man.
Hoppe’s just wrong. The accumulation of falsehoods by the Cathedral Religion is all the evidence we need.
There is no difference between the manufacture, distribution, and sale of products, services, and information. And rothbard limits us to products, hoppe to an optimistic view of services, and me(doolittle) extends to information. I am more pessimistic than the other two.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-19 11:53:00 UTC