DECONFLATING THE PEJORATIVE: ‘SLAVERY’ My criticism is of chattel slavery, and this is an other example of the problem of conflation and ideal types instead of spectra. – Hard Labor Slavery (‘the mines’ etc – throw them away.) – Chattel Slavery (involuntary, labor, parasitism) – Punishment Slavery (prisoners) – Debt Slavery (Bonded [restitution]) – Civic Slavery (The Military [non-substitutable payment]) – Indentured Servitude (Contracted room, board, care) – Temporary Dependency (children, the ill, room board, care) – Permanent Dependency (pets, animals, ai’s) – Possessions (objects and non-sentient life) I don’t see why we can’t distinguish between each of these, separating the difference between parasitism, punishment, restitution, payment(military service), compensation, and dependency.
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
Deconflating Slavery
I have no problem with voluntary servitude, and I think we should restore and expand it. It’s work for the military for thousands of years, and it worked for private and small businesses for thousands as well. plenty of people would sign up for guaranteed employment in exchange for room, board, and small spending money. for all intents and purposes, some factories in china operate on this principle. The form of servitude I feel we miss the most are the Regiments that need civic emergency and militia equivalents, and the Monasteries/Nunneries, that need secular intellectual, and labor, equivalents. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev Ukraine. -
We had to learn to understand the hate because we could not FEEL the hate. And y
We had to learn to understand the hate because we could not FEEL the hate. And yet here you are, vainly attempting to make us FEEL bad about it. We understand what you are doing. So we are coming. Fear us. — Eli Harman
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-25 21:17:00 UTC
-
“It’s never the right time to have kids, but it’s always the right time for scre
—“It’s never the right time to have kids, but it’s always the right time for screwing. God’s not a dumb shit. He knows how it works.”–Justin Halperin
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-25 19:59:00 UTC
-
DECONFLATING THE PEJORATIVE: ‘SLAVERY’ My criticism is of chattel slavery, and t
DECONFLATING THE PEJORATIVE: ‘SLAVERY’
My criticism is of chattel slavery, and this is an other example of the problem of conflation and ideal types instead of spectra.
– Hard Labor Slavery (‘the mines’ etc – throw them away.)
– Chattel Slavery (involuntary, labor, parasitism)
– Punishment Slavery (prisoners)
– Debt Slavery (Bonded [restitution])
– Civic Slavery (The Military [non-substitutable payment])
– Serfdom (involuntary indentured servitude)
– Indentured Servitude (Contracted room, board, care)
– Temporary Dependency (children, the ill, room board, care)
– Permanent Dependency (pets, animals, ai’s)
– Possessions (objects and non-sentient life)
I don’t see why we can’t distinguish between each of these, separating the difference between parasitism, punishment, restitution, payment(military service), compensation, and dependency.
I have no problem with voluntary servitude, and I think we should restore and expand it. It’s work for the military for thousands of years, and it worked for private and small businesses for thousands as well. plenty of people would sign up for guaranteed employment in exchange for room, board, and small spending money. for all intents and purposes, some factories in china operate on this principle.
The form of servitude I feel we miss the most are the Regiments that need civic emergency and militia equivalents, and the Monasteries/Nunneries, that need secular intellectual, and labor, equivalents.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-25 19:16:00 UTC
-
Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Adorno+co for starters
Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Adorno+co for starters.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-25 05:00:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802013986665463808
Reply addressees: @digitalErmit @VonMacht @Salon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802005800986275840
IN REPLY TO:
@digitalErmit
@curtdoolittle @VonMacht @Salon Thanks for the insights so far. Can you please give an example of such “left pseudoscience”? I’m center-left
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/802005800986275840
-
I wouldn’t take that too seriously. It’s more about the target markets of each m
I wouldn’t take that too seriously. It’s more about the target markets of each method of argument. And they overlap heavily.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-25 02:55:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801982594795634689
Reply addressees: @VonMacht
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801981811198984194
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801981811198984194
-
I think so. 🙂
I think so. 🙂
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-25 02:47:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801980482766381056
Reply addressees: @VonMacht
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801980369562177536
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801980369562177536
-
Paul appears to be talented.But he is new, and on the popular side.Our thought l
Paul appears to be talented.But he is new, and on the popular side.Our thought leadership is small and quiet.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-25 02:46:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801980304479125504
Reply addressees: @VonMacht @digitalErmit @Salon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801979473948241920
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801979473948241920
-
Not following. AltRight people won’t reframe rebrand.They’re attached to the nam
Not following. AltRight people won’t reframe rebrand.They’re attached to the name. I’ve tried.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-25 02:35:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801977609429155842
Reply addressees: @digitalErmit @VonMacht @Salon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801977346760863744
IN REPLY TO:
@digitalErmit
@curtdoolittle @VonMacht @Salon Which part of “no compromise” will allow for your “reframing” ? You can ignore that. https://t.co/dgn7AU65wo
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801977346760863744
-
TOLD YOU. FIRE IS THE BEST WEAPON
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/24/world/middleeast/israel-fires.html?_r=0I TOLD YOU. FIRE IS THE BEST WEAPON.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-24 19:55:00 UTC