Honestly people, the accusation that Propertarianism isn’t accessible is simply untrue. It isn’t in COURSE form, but all the insights are there to consume as fairly simple series (lists). The ‘book’ is up there. The courses are not.
If you want ‘in early’ you can do it. I’ve laid it all out for you.
otherwise when I get the courses done you’ll know it.
Look at what we did in the thread on “line” the past few days.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 21:52:00 UTC
—“Hi, Curt still reading up on what you have written. I wanted to prepare a more detailed examination of what was written. On the other side, the thing about math you written today blew my mind. Deep stuff!”—
It’s an example of what happens when you don’t fall into the trap of PLATONISM – which is a cheap means of cognition, but limits you from fuller understanding.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 18:02:00 UTC
(from elsewhere)
I mean, so many of the guys who come at me, do so for what are reducible to statements of loyalty to my tribe. Yet, if my tribe makes BAD STRATEGIC DECISIONS and I choose to make BETTER ones, am I disloyal to the tribe or simply doing the moral thing?
There is no value in numbers that pursue the wrong strategy.
I’ve been saying this to the WN audience for a couple years now. Rallying and ridiculing the left so that they lose the power of guilt was a brilliant and successful strategy., Poisoning the well on the internet and reversing their strategy upon them, was brilliant and successful.
But once you’ve weakened your enemy you have to lead. And to lead you need solutions not criticisms.
I work on solutions.
And I get dumped on as being disloyal for not piling on behind a losing strategy.
Ergo I see the WN movement instead of the secessionist and international nationalist movements, as harmful to the cause of nationalism.
And (as usual honestly) I”m right.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 09:43:00 UTC
This is hilarious!
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 09:19:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-24 21:31:00 UTC
—“It’s getting to the point where you’d have to physically remove all the libertarians in order to bring about a libertarian order”—Chris Lavan
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-24 15:48:00 UTC
damn guys. some of you had your wheaties today.
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-24 12:27:00 UTC
BANNING – BLOCKING POLICY
Since 2009 I have hardly banned anyone. And in the past few months it’s become are regular occurrence. I am not sure why, other than (a) I will not buy into the nazi thing, and (b) the libertards are desperate.
Stuff I think I should ban for:
(a) trolling, (b) disingenuousness, (c) memes, (d) name calling, (e) non-arguments, (f) serious IQ vs Dunning Kruger issues.
Now my position is that I never back down from a fight. But you know, these retards are not really fighting. They’re just imposing a cost upon me. Raiders aren’t warriors so to speak.
And I usually find ‘talking to the underclass’ improves my (our) argumentative ability. And it does function as a means of marketing to the friends of idiots who are not necessarily such idiots.
(And honestly I find humiliating morons cathartic.)
But time is time – yours and mine. So I’m going to take your advice and get more aggressive for no other reason than saving myself some time.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-24 10:34:00 UTC
Interesting analysis
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-24 07:47:00 UTC
Word of the day:
–“Anglopomorphism”—John Zebley
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 15:29:00 UTC