—“Conservatism is embarrassing for the same reason that virtually ALL modern thought is embarrassing … comforting lies are more profitable to tell than hard truths.”— Julian le Roux
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-10 15:21:00 UTC
—“Conservatism is embarrassing for the same reason that virtually ALL modern thought is embarrassing … comforting lies are more profitable to tell than hard truths.”— Julian le Roux
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-10 15:21:00 UTC
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE RIGHT?
—“What *happened* to the right? Despite the fact that I lean right I often find myself embarrassed by the state of modern conservative thought and its aggressively anti-intellectual tendencies. Today’s conservatives can’t seem to accept evolution or articulate a coherent vision of right-wing principles and theory, yet they descend from De Maistre, Evola, Burke, Mises, Rand, and similar thinkers. Other than you, Moldbug, and a handful of libertarians like Tom Woods and Bob Murphy there is almost nothing interesting happening. What went wrong?”— A Friend
They couldn’t find an answer to social darwinism and the fact that western civilization is in fact, darwinian – and that this darwinianism is the reason for our success.
What do you do when you tell the lie of democracy and at the same time have to tell the truth of darwinian evolution?
You talk nonsense
That’s what
—“Ah. So if we don’t want to squander the promise of the Western Aristocratic tradition there’s no avoiding social Darwinism?”—
Bingo.
We have to TELL THE TRUTH.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-10 13:24:00 UTC
The Four Horsemen of Reconstruction: 1-Peterson(Meaning), 2-Haidt (Explanation) 3-Doolittle(Law), 4-Taleb (Measurement)
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-10 10:50:00 UTC
https://propertarianism.com/2015/01/18/the-cure-for-propaganda-and-western-civilization/IN DEPTH – THE CURE FOR PROPAGANDA
(for newbies) (worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-10 10:29:00 UTC
https://propertarianism.com/2016/05/25/perfect-government/WE HAD PERFECT GOVERNMENT AND WE BLEW IT
(for newbies)(worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-10 10:29:00 UTC
https://twitter.com/DuxHispanii/status/821126685596778500/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=curtdoolittle&utm_content=840123662673965057Retweeted Úlfheðinn (@DuxHispanii):
Accurate https://t.co/7EgfQrV6IA
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-10 03:54:00 UTC
thanks. will fix. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-10 01:23:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/840010121883332610
Reply addressees: @itsles3
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/839979779239600128
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/839979779239600128
( When I eat black jellybeans I imagine them as liberal souls. They taste better. )
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-09 16:23:00 UTC
So, you know who blocks me that I know about?
– Kinsella for humiliating him – and yes, I did it on purpose. Sorry.
– The Critical Rationalist group. They can’t tolerate my argument that popper failed, and that testimonialism completes the Popperian Project. (i find this ironic beyond belief – and I consider it a cult now.)
– A host of Rothbardian Libertines. (which as a cult I understand)
– A few of the neo-nazis. (which as a cult, i understand )
– Two of the ultra left wing (cult) economics sites.
I mean, I totally understand unfriending me – for no other reason that the amount of content I produce, or because it will freak out your normie friends. But blocking me is just acknowledgement of your failure to defend your positions.
I mean. My strategy is to play king of the hill: “come and get me”. I don’t troll people. I attack falsehoods,. If you can’t take the hill then just admit it. Because blocking me is just cowardice.
Until recently I’d blocked very few people. The only reason I block people is because they troll or are too stupid, to solipsistically emotional, or too far along the schizotypal spectrum. which means argument and discourse are not possible. ) You should always attract opponents so that you can learn from them. I mean, I get frustrated with people all the time but it’s good criticism that makes you better at what you do, and forces you to abandon your erroneous priors.
People I admire most are honest liberals (Karl Smith @ Forbes ) and honest conservatives ( Pat Buchanan ). You can run an empire with honest liberals, libertarians, and conservatives. The problem is it’s too easy to speak and maintain falsehoods in politics and it’s almost impossible to do that in the physical sciences. So why don’t we practice in the social sciences (which are arguably more important) what we practice in the physical sciences?
The answer is that truthful debate would force people into making exchanges and they’d prefer all or nothing wins and losses.
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-09 09:44:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2017-03-08 18:46:00 UTC