Sorry professor. Your students have to pay for access.
Mine have to survive it.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-12 09:43:00 UTC
Sorry professor. Your students have to pay for access.
Mine have to survive it.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-12 09:43:00 UTC
—“Trump responses to reporters: Troll`ing at Presidential level.—“Robert Gonzalez
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 20:22:00 UTC
(Blocked a few of the green frog crowd who cannot understand the argumentative dress code. No shirt, No shoes, So service. Well, here, it’s “No argument, No manners, No posting”. Same difference.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 18:15:00 UTC
Assumes a non-scarcity of time and attention In other words, if you have nothing to say and nothing to contribute and your time is not precious then of course it is an equally unimportant investment for you. I can’t even compose an intelligent response to you in 300 chars.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 16:02:29 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/5088254910614520
—“I think Peterson’s IQ and personality info lectures are great for understanding the world. He’s such a good speaker that he makes that stuff easy to absorb and understand, and he does a great job of highlighting its real-world ramifications. But Curt’s stuff is the solution for FIXING the world.”—John Lille
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 15:08:00 UTC
PETERSON YOUR KIDS AND DOOLITTLE EVERYONE ELSE
by Luke Weinhagen
Recently a friend observed and remarked I interact very differently with my immediate family than I do with others.
I summarized it for him as:
– With my kids, if I can not explain why I say no – I do not say no.
– With the rest of the world, if I can not explain why I say yes – I do not say yes.
And I end up saying no often and yes much less so.
After reading this if he asks again I’ll just tell him “I Peterson my kids and Doolittle everyone else.”
(Curt: as it should be. 😉 )
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 13:41:00 UTC
Honestly. I get accused of word salad, but then some idiot or other will argue hoppe makes sense. Well, you know, that’s just because he says what you want to hear, and what you want to hear makes sense to your intuitions, and what makes sense to your intuitions is that which corresponds to your moral instincts. In other words, you are victim of suggestion using fictionalism, just as I have argued for years now. The conditions you make moral judgements by are not the conditions that exist. They are merely your cognitive biases, and your cognitive biases are merely reflections of your reproductive(survival, competitive) strategy. Meaning? Abrahamism in the ancient and the modern worlds finds useful idiots all too easily.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 09:52:00 UTC
Google is the Christian Science Cult of the current generation.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 02:27:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-10 23:30:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-10 23:03:00 UTC