Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • (Guy from FPS Russia arrested by ATF for buying pot extracts for his vaping.) —

    (Guy from FPS Russia arrested by ATF for buying pot extracts for his vaping.) —“The ATF only obtained a search warrant for the Myers property in Carnesville, Georgia, after the local sheriff caught the 31-year-old gun enthusiast receiving, one local source reports, butane honey oil (a marijuana concentrate) through the United States Postal Service. The warrant enabled the ATF to carry out the search, during which agents confiscated over 50 firearms, drug paraphernalia, and more drugs, possibly butane honey oil. No illegal explosives were found on the property.”—
  • (Guy from FPS Russia arrested by ATF for buying pot extracts for his vaping.) —

    (Guy from FPS Russia arrested by ATF for buying pot extracts for his vaping.) —“The ATF only obtained a search warrant for the Myers property in Carnesville, Georgia, after the local sheriff caught the 31-year-old gun enthusiast receiving, one local source reports, butane honey oil (a marijuana concentrate) through the United States Postal Service. The warrant enabled the ATF to carry out the search, during which agents confiscated over 50 firearms, drug paraphernalia, and more drugs, possibly butane honey oil. No illegal explosives were found on the property.”—
  • (Guy from FPS Russia arrested by ATF for buying pot extracts for his vaping.) —

    (Guy from FPS Russia arrested by ATF for buying pot extracts for his vaping.)

    —“The ATF only obtained a search warrant for the Myers property in Carnesville, Georgia, after the local sheriff caught the 31-year-old gun enthusiast receiving, one local source reports, butane honey oil (a marijuana concentrate) through the United States Postal Service. The warrant enabled the ATF to carry out the search, during which agents confiscated over 50 firearms, drug paraphernalia, and more drugs, possibly butane honey oil. No illegal explosives were found on the property.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-19 19:21:00 UTC

  • “People like Curt are the problem and not part of the solution.”— A Critic All

    —“People like Curt are the problem and not part of the solution.”— A Critic All: I don’t really have any technical critics. I kind of doubt I will ever see those any more than Aristotle, Machiavelli, Hume, Darwin, Menger, and Hayek saw technical critics. I have that I know of only non-technical critics. Most fall into the following camps: a) (Possible) They question whether, if my proposals were enacted that people would, compete the nationalist program and return to many, small, european nation states. b) (Practical) They prefer a faster, more ‘collectivist’ strategy in which they feel they have social (verbal) influence – or they feel that it is impractical to raise a revolution and enact constitutional changes. c) (Political) They are trying to rally through some sort of framing and my solution prevents emotional rallying by falsifying their framing and replaces it with one that is d) (Philosophical) They feel out of control and are seeking a means of control through some sort of framing that I have falsified. e) (Psychological) They feel out of control and are seeking a means of control and they cannot understand the algorithmic (operational) method that I’ve produced, and this makes them feel out of control again. FWIW: I can obviously understand and empathize with each of these criticisms. However, my intellectual contribution to mankind will survive and probably have influence regardless of those criticisms. So I have a list of objectives and the top of that list is producing that work. I know I can complete that work. I know a revolutionary change is possible because I know how easily that the American government can be collapsed. Whether I am able to produce a revolution and cause that collapse and institute such a constitutions *as I plan* is certainly a question. If I was ten years younger I wouldn’t really have any doubts. But my energy levels have decreased rapidly over the past decade and a half – possible just due to my illnesses, and possibly due to age. But that does not mean others who are younger, or more suited, or have more energy, will not succeed if I don’t. That it is possible to do a thing, and the labor and organization to do a thing are something different.
  • “People like Curt are the problem and not part of the solution.”— A Critic All

    —“People like Curt are the problem and not part of the solution.”— A Critic All: I don’t really have any technical critics. I kind of doubt I will ever see those any more than Aristotle, Machiavelli, Hume, Darwin, Menger, and Hayek saw technical critics. I have that I know of only non-technical critics. Most fall into the following camps: a) (Possible) They question whether, if my proposals were enacted that people would, compete the nationalist program and return to many, small, european nation states. b) (Practical) They prefer a faster, more ‘collectivist’ strategy in which they feel they have social (verbal) influence – or they feel that it is impractical to raise a revolution and enact constitutional changes. c) (Political) They are trying to rally through some sort of framing and my solution prevents emotional rallying by falsifying their framing and replaces it with one that is d) (Philosophical) They feel out of control and are seeking a means of control through some sort of framing that I have falsified. e) (Psychological) They feel out of control and are seeking a means of control and they cannot understand the algorithmic (operational) method that I’ve produced, and this makes them feel out of control again. FWIW: I can obviously understand and empathize with each of these criticisms. However, my intellectual contribution to mankind will survive and probably have influence regardless of those criticisms. So I have a list of objectives and the top of that list is producing that work. I know I can complete that work. I know a revolutionary change is possible because I know how easily that the American government can be collapsed. Whether I am able to produce a revolution and cause that collapse and institute such a constitutions *as I plan* is certainly a question. If I was ten years younger I wouldn’t really have any doubts. But my energy levels have decreased rapidly over the past decade and a half – possible just due to my illnesses, and possibly due to age. But that does not mean others who are younger, or more suited, or have more energy, will not succeed if I don’t. That it is possible to do a thing, and the labor and organization to do a thing are something different.
  • “People like Curt are the problem and not part of the solution.”— A Critic All

    —“People like Curt are the problem and not part of the solution.”— A Critic

    All: I don’t really have any technical critics. I kind of doubt I will ever see those any more than Aristotle, Machiavelli, Hume, Darwin, Menger, and Hayek saw technical critics. I have that I know of only non-technical critics. Most fall into the following camps:

    a) (Possible) They question whether, if my proposals were enacted that people would, compete the nationalist program and return to many, small, european nation states.

    b) (Practical) They prefer a faster, more ‘collectivist’ strategy in which they feel they have social (verbal) influence – or they feel that it is impractical to raise a revolution and enact constitutional changes.

    c) (Political) They are trying to rally through some sort of framing and my solution prevents emotional rallying by falsifying their framing and replaces it with one that is

    d) (Philosophical) They feel out of control and are seeking a means of control through some sort of framing that I have falsified.

    e) (Psychological) They feel out of control and are seeking a means of control and they cannot understand the algorithmic (operational) method that I’ve produced, and this makes them feel out of control again.

    FWIW: I can obviously understand and empathize with each of these criticisms. However, my intellectual contribution to mankind will survive and probably have influence regardless of those criticisms. So I have a list of objectives and the top of that list is producing that work. I know I can complete that work. I know a revolutionary change is possible because I know how easily that the American government can be collapsed. Whether I am able to produce a revolution and cause that collapse and institute such a constitutions *as I plan* is certainly a question. If I was ten years younger I wouldn’t really have any doubts. But my energy levels have decreased rapidly over the past decade and a half – possible just due to my illnesses, and possibly due to age. But that does not mean others who are younger, or more suited, or have more energy, will not succeed if I don’t.

    That it is possible to do a thing, and the labor and organization to do a thing are something different.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-19 11:57:00 UTC

  • Did I say bite me? I thought I said Bite Me. Or maybe I forgot to say Bite Me. S

    Did I say bite me? I thought I said Bite Me. Or maybe I forgot to say Bite Me. So either way, whether I sed it or not, Bite Me. 😉 lolz


    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-17 20:48:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/909519414747439104

    Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @kweenslandah

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/908690037113589760


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/908690037113589760

  • Presented without comment

    Presented without comment
  • Presented without comment

    Presented without comment
  • Presented without comment

    Presented without comment


    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-15 14:26:00 UTC