Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
“Speaking truth to power when it truly matters can render someone a perceived hi
—“Speaking truth to power when it truly matters can render someone a perceived high threat, especially if in response to someone else’s bad behaviours towards that someone. Doing so often makes us “bad” and “aggressive” because, yes, we won’t submit to being good as you characterise it, as being someone’s mere tool. Tools are expended and dispensed of.”— Davin Eastley -
“Speaking truth to power when it truly matters can render someone a perceived hi
—“Speaking truth to power when it truly matters can render someone a perceived high threat, especially if in response to someone else’s bad behaviours towards that someone.
Doing so often makes us “bad” and “aggressive” because, yes, we won’t submit to being good as you characterise it, as being someone’s mere tool. Tools are expended and dispensed of.”— Davin Eastley
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-30 13:15:00 UTC
-
“Speaking truth to power when it truly matters can render someone a perceived hi
—“Speaking truth to power when it truly matters can render someone a perceived high threat, especially if in response to someone else’s bad behaviours towards that someone. Doing so often makes us “bad” and “aggressive” because, yes, we won’t submit to being good as you characterise it, as being someone’s mere tool. Tools are expended and dispensed of.”— Davin Eastley -
Insult Of The Day
—“I don’t think you’ve ever met a female. More likely just other emasculated men who you’ve mistakenly misidentified.”— Robert Hayes -
INSULT OF THE DAY —“I don’t think you’ve ever met a female. More likely just o
INSULT OF THE DAY
—“I don’t think you’ve ever met a female. More likely just other emasculated men who you’ve mistakenly misidentified.”— Robert Hayes
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-30 13:06:00 UTC
-
Insult Of The Day
—“I don’t think you’ve ever met a female. More likely just other emasculated men who you’ve mistakenly misidentified.”— Robert Hayes -
1) the nyt was in the process of producing an expose. they interviewed a “substa
1) the nyt was in the process of producing an expose. they interviewed a “substantial” number of women. 2) nbc management found out from staff. 3) they had prior knowledge for years. 4) tolerance of it pierces board and officer protections ( i have had this problem with a male exec who was harmless, even cute, and none of the women wanted to prosecute, but counsel is adamant) 5) they had no choice but to act and act before outed by the nyt. -
1) the nyt was in the process of producing an expose. they interviewed a “substa
1) the nyt was in the process of producing an expose. they interviewed a “substantial” number of women.
2) nbc management found out from staff.
3) they had prior knowledge for years.
4) tolerance of it pierces board and officer protections ( i have had this problem with a male exec who was harmless, even cute, and none of the women wanted to prosecute, but counsel is adamant)
5) they had no choice but to act and act before outed by the nyt.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-29 22:40:00 UTC
-
1) the nyt was in the process of producing an expose. they interviewed a “substa
1) the nyt was in the process of producing an expose. they interviewed a “substantial” number of women. 2) nbc management found out from staff. 3) they had prior knowledge for years. 4) tolerance of it pierces board and officer protections ( i have had this problem with a male exec who was harmless, even cute, and none of the women wanted to prosecute, but counsel is adamant) 5) they had no choice but to act and act before outed by the nyt. -
Untitled
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-29 15:34:00 UTC