photos_and_videos/TheGreatGame_10155865944942264/24294454_10155930822637264_5103468180485574376_n_10155930822637264.jpg MAKAROV
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-03 11:04:00 UTC
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
A man is admitted to the hospital, unconscious, with a history of serious health
A man is admitted to the hospital, unconscious, with a history of serious health problems and a high blood alcohol level. He has no identification and no family with him. On his chest, he has a tattoo: “Do Not Resuscitate”, and a signature, his, right-justified beneath it. Do you resuscitate him or let natural events take their course?
(Serious Question. This happened recently.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-02 18:04:00 UTC
-
“It’s time for another Norman invasion.”— Ely Harman
—“It’s time for another Norman invasion.”— Ely Harman
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-02 14:45:00 UTC
-
The Technique – Insult, Repeat Central Argument, Exhaust.
Nah. I don’t make argumentative fallacies. Whenever I think the other party is disingenuous or stupid I use Ad Hominems to increase their frustration and dampen their feeling of success, then restate the central argument, and repeat that process in response to every retort until the other party gives up. This allows me to construct an argument and appeal to the audience, rather than interact with the individual. It makes enemies that tend to leave you alone afterward as not being worth their trouble – which is the whole point. Meanwhile you’ve enlightened all the lurkers by using the useful idiot’s blathering as a promotional vehicle. I learned this technique back in the 80’s and i’ve maintained the zero-tolerance-policy and unforgiving retaliation since that time. -
The Technique – Insult, Repeat Central Argument, Exhaust.
Nah. I don’t make argumentative fallacies. Whenever I think the other party is disingenuous or stupid I use Ad Hominems to increase their frustration and dampen their feeling of success, then restate the central argument, and repeat that process in response to every retort until the other party gives up. This allows me to construct an argument and appeal to the audience, rather than interact with the individual. It makes enemies that tend to leave you alone afterward as not being worth their trouble – which is the whole point. Meanwhile you’ve enlightened all the lurkers by using the useful idiot’s blathering as a promotional vehicle. I learned this technique back in the 80’s and i’ve maintained the zero-tolerance-policy and unforgiving retaliation since that time. -
THE TECHNIQUE – INSULT, REPEAT CENTRAL ARGUMENT, EXHAUST. Nah. I don’t make argu
THE TECHNIQUE – INSULT, REPEAT CENTRAL ARGUMENT, EXHAUST.
Nah. I don’t make argumentative fallacies. Whenever I think the other party is disingenuous or stupid I use Ad Hominems to increase their frustration and dampen their feeling of success, then restate the central argument, and repeat that process in response to every retort until the other party gives up. This allows me to construct an argument and appeal to the audience, rather than interact with the individual. It makes enemies that tend to leave you alone afterward as not being worth their trouble – which is the whole point. Meanwhile you’ve enlightened all the lurkers by using the useful idiot’s blathering as a promotional vehicle. I learned this technique back in the 80’s and i’ve maintained the zero-tolerance-policy and unforgiving retaliation since that time.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-02 14:00:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-02 13:14:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle, do you think capitalism is undermining itself
Curt Doolittle, do you think capitalism is undermining itself.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-02 13:06:00 UTC
-
Well, I don’t do fiction, or moral literature (conflation and inflation), I do s
Well, I don’t do fiction, or moral literature (conflation and inflation), I do science, economics, law, argument and testimony (deflation). So as far as I know I’m as right as possible without being wrong. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-01 02:13:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/936417873270071296
Reply addressees: @KANTBOT20K
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/936386447841611776
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@KANTBOT20K Ok. I’m your huckleberry. Now I have to do a little research. Cause Rousseau’s just a fictional statement of pre-agrarian feminism, and Marxism is just the pseudoscientific version of abrahamism, and abrahamism is just the supernatural version of pastoralism. “Chick Stuff.”
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/936386447841611776
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@KANTBOT20K Ok. I’m your huckleberry. Now I have to do a little research. Cause Rousseau’s just a fictional statement of pre-agrarian feminism, and Marxism is just the pseudoscientific version of abrahamism, and abrahamism is just the supernatural version of pastoralism. “Chick Stuff.”
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/936386447841611776
-
Ok. I’m your huckleberry. Now I have to do a little research. Cause Rousseau’s j
Ok. I’m your huckleberry. Now I have to do a little research. Cause Rousseau’s just a fictional statement of pre-agrarian feminism, and Marxism is just the pseudoscientific version of abrahamism, and abrahamism is just the supernatural version of pastoralism. “Chick Stuff.”
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-01 00:08:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/936386447841611776
Reply addressees: @KANTBOT20K
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/936020944170225664
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/936020944170225664