Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

(f) No matter how pissed dishonest trolls make me. And it is quite possible to p

(f) No matter how pissed dishonest trolls make me. And it is quite possible to piss me off furiously by dishonest trolling. Yes. And I don’t see any reason why it shouldn’t.

Source date (UTC): 2018-01-16 13:52:09 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953263609198579712

Reply addressees: @Imperius__13

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953261666594099200

IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@Imperius__13 (d)So I’m stuck in a position with a dishonest if not ignorant opponent, trolling me, denying the constitution of logic itself, conflating states of existence, equating inference with correspondence, and an audience equally ignorant. I just stayed on message: Stop denying.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/953261666594099200

IN REPLY TO:

@curtdoolittle

@Imperius__13 (d)So I’m stuck in a position with a dishonest if not ignorant opponent, trolling me, denying the constitution of logic itself, conflating states of existence, equating inference with correspondence, and an audience equally ignorant. I just stayed on message: Stop denying.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/953261666594099200

January 16, 2018
(d)So I’m stuck in a position with a dishonest if not ignorant opponent, trollin

(d)So I’m stuck in a position with a dishonest if not ignorant opponent, trolling me, denying the constitution of logic itself, conflating states of existence, equating inference with correspondence, and an audience equally ignorant. I just stayed on message: Stop denying.

Source date (UTC): 2018-01-16 13:44:26 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953261666594099200

Reply addressees: @Imperius__13

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953250310721622016

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953250310721622016

January 16, 2018
(b) and I lost my temper because of his dishonesty? ( yeah. Its possible. I have

(b) and I lost my temper because of his dishonesty? ( yeah. Its possible. I have a thing about dishonest people trolling me. ) I kept trying to circumvent his trolling and force the central argument, and I let him get my goat. For certain.

Source date (UTC): 2018-01-16 13:37:28 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953259914079670273

Reply addressees: @Imperius__13

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953250310721622016

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953250310721622016

January 16, 2018
That’s fine with me munchkin. I’ll still have tried, succeeded or failed at a th

That’s fine with me munchkin. I’ll still have tried, succeeded or failed at a thousand times as many things in my life as you ever will even imagine. Doesn’t change the fact that psychology is a pseudoscience, you are have over invested in it, justify it despite its falsehood.

Source date (UTC): 2018-01-16 13:10:52 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953253220360638464

Reply addressees: @Imperius__13

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953251966716710912

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953251966716710912

January 16, 2018
Keep trying to cover your tracks. Sorry man but I’ve owned in every discipline I

Keep trying to cover your tracks. Sorry man but I’ve owned in every discipline I’ve tried. And I’ve managed to do it through aspieness, two cancers, two major diseases, divorces, asthma, pneumonia, COPD, and business challenges that would crush the weak. Deal with it. I succeed.

Source date (UTC): 2018-01-16 13:07:47 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953252442803789825

Reply addressees: @Imperius__13

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953250877506244609

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953250877506244609

January 16, 2018
Again, and ad hom rather than argue the truth or falsehood of the central argume

Again, and ad hom rather than argue the truth or falsehood of the central argument.

(BTW: I’ve made multiple fortunes, and on average, in all of history it takes 10 years to produce a work of this complexity. & I’m just probably three standard deviations in IQ above you. Sorry.)

Source date (UTC): 2018-01-16 13:02:58 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953251231945936896

Reply addressees: @Imperius__13

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953250310721622016

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953250310721622016

January 16, 2018
Again. Either make an argument or don’t. We’ve already established that you are

Again. Either make an argument or don’t. We’ve already established that you are trying to debate dishonestly, rely on a pseudoscience, and justify your malinvestment in falsehoods and deceit. (But I also know that this is a genetic failing that you probably cannot correct.)

Source date (UTC): 2018-01-16 12:57:48 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953249931036450816

Reply addressees: @Imperius__13

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953249518509809664

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953249518509809664

January 16, 2018
Again, a psychologism. Is the statement that psychology is a pseudoscience, for

Again, a psychologism. Is the statement that psychology is a pseudoscience, for the purpose of perpetuating frauds, and that that ridicule, shaming, gossiping and rallying are means of conducting thefts?

Source date (UTC): 2018-01-16 12:44:54 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953246684926144512

Reply addressees: @Imperius__13

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953246163792261120

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953246163792261120

January 16, 2018
Are you conducting an honest argument, or are you now just engaging in further a

Are you conducting an honest argument, or are you now just engaging in further acts of shaming, accusation, and straw manning? (these are all forms of fraud, and socialization of losses). Do you see how legal and economic analysis differs? It’s not opinion or preference.

Source date (UTC): 2018-01-16 12:43:44 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953246391253569536

Reply addressees: @Imperius__13

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953245847336243200

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953245847336243200

January 16, 2018
Well, psychology is a pseudoscience, right? Why would you preserve a word (frami

Well, psychology is a pseudoscience, right? Why would you preserve a word (framing) that’s pseudoscientific? So mapping incentives to acquire interests is literally ‘the study of incentives’. So a scientist would call it incentives, or rational choice theory. …

Source date (UTC): 2018-01-16 12:18:03 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953239926304362497

Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @nntaleb

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953237918470017026

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/953237918470017026

January 16, 2018