Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

do you have any idea what the topic of discussion was, or do you always post the

do you have any idea what the topic of discussion was, or do you always post the ridiculous, irrelevant and tangential to the discourse like throwing spaghetti against the wall?

Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 02:08:33 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974105036149219328

Reply addressees: @leo_charlton @WebPaigee

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974102321641730048

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974102321641730048

March 15, 2018
To create a straw man is a fallacy. Explanation (empirical) provides lower retur

To create a straw man is a fallacy. Explanation (empirical) provides lower returns than innovative (disruptive) in all fields without exception. Star with Mokyr and thn his bibliographies.

Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 01:34:34 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974096484391182336

Reply addressees: @leo_charlton @WebPaigee

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974095490215182336

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974095490215182336

March 15, 2018
1 – they concluded (assumed) meaning “contradicted their findings”. 2 – the data

1 – they concluded (assumed) meaning “contradicted their findings”.
2 – the data is consistent across all studies and cultures.

Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 01:09:25 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974090156771889158

Reply addressees: @WebPaigee @leo_charlton

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974086311446491136

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974086311446491136

March 15, 2018
so no. You don’t have an argument

so no. You don’t have an argument.

Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 01:07:13 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974089601483755520

Reply addressees: @leo_charlton

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974084522110205952

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974084522110205952

March 15, 2018
STEM is a term of art, that refers to a course load including science, technolog

STEM is a term of art, that refers to a course load including science, technology, engineering and mathematics. What does his use of the term have to do with his understanding of the literature in experimental psychology, cognitive science, and neurology or any other data?

Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 00:42:36 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974083407222394880

Reply addressees: @leo_charlton

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974081949114527744

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974081949114527744

March 15, 2018
While a scientist, his functional goal is self help,and his method is jungian,wh

While a scientist, his functional goal is self help,and his method is jungian,which means his philosophy is literary, in the tradition of Plato, not in the tradition of Aristotle. My critics say the opposite. We need both via positiva literature and via negativa: Science and Law.

Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 00:17:26 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974077072556679169

Reply addressees: @FouadBoussetta

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973997669961093121

IN REPLY TO:

@FouadBoussetta

Just finished #12rulesforlife by #JordanPeterson. It’s excellent, a definite #mustread. But Dr Peterson is not that free of illusions and wishful thinking himself… I strongly recommend his book but I must agree with this critical review here: https://t.co/kMXE1p3e2S https://t.co/gpfrOWfSxF

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973997669961093121

March 15, 2018
What does he say that is pseudoscientific? Give me an example

What does he say that is pseudoscientific? Give me an example.

Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 00:14:07 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974076236984147968

Reply addressees: @belle_levesque

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973211640324698112

IN REPLY TO:

@belle_levesque

How can anyone waste their money on this asshat?

blah, blah blah gynecology, psychology, history, economics, biology, physics, criminology, philosophy blah, blah, blah

That’ll be 10 bucks.
#JordanPeterson https://t.co/xCT0JVJbj5

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973211640324698112

March 15, 2018
Give me an example. Let me see if I can falsify that claim

Give me an example. Let me see if I can falsify that claim.

Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 00:13:37 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974076115034820608

Reply addressees: @ValorSearch @jordanbpeterson

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973662754807586816

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973662754807586816

March 15, 2018
That says precisely nothing. He has found a way to restate our founding philosop

That says precisely nothing.
He has found a way to restate our founding philosophy in modern literary and scientific terms. It’s genius.

Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 00:13:05 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974075977834868736

Reply addressees: @MarcosAH6

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971407552880791553

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/971407552880791553

March 15, 2018
Debate me. I’ll eat you for lunch munchkin. He’s just talking over your head

Debate me. I’ll eat you for lunch munchkin. He’s just talking over your head.

Source date (UTC): 2018-03-15 00:10:02 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/974075211401383941

Reply addressees: @leo_charlton

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973687742298296320

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/973687742298296320

March 15, 2018