RT @DavidJPba: The answer to tyranny is not better leadership. The answer to tyranny is better citizenship.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-21 22:53:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782180971447509003
RT @DavidJPba: The answer to tyranny is not better leadership. The answer to tyranny is better citizenship.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-21 22:53:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782180971447509003
RT @AshaLogos: I’d like to see we ‘extremists’ have just a bit more patience for those who believe the wrong things for the right reasons -…
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-21 21:04:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782153468804759977
Heck. I thought that was just you. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-21 20:59:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782152081962340624
Reply addressees: @NickmhTw
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782151959614837196
OMG. So true.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-21 20:57:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782151782916817214
Reply addressees: @auny_marie
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782151417802731772
Excellent. Reposted. Thanks for sharing.
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-21 20:19:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782142195014815904
Reply addressees: @oldbooksguy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782070256149905448
(English Language Humor)
Proper folk pronounce Aunt as “AWE-nt”, and the little folk say “Ant”.
Proper folk pronounce Route as “Root” and the little people say “Rahwt”
Proper folks and little folk both pronounce “Router” – as in network router – as “rahwter”.
Sigh. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-21 20:07:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782139004382507458
Of course. Though even they have limits. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-21 18:48:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782119300393996363
Reply addressees: @Rockwale @AltPublishNow @RealPatrickWebb
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782103194585165849
RT @curtdoolittle: @AltPublishNow @Rockwale @RealPatrickWebb I would agree that the people on the fringes are more likely to identify quest…
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-21 18:48:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782119121141821900
RT @curtdoolittle: @AltPublishNow @RealPatrickWebb SEYMOUR HERSH’S REPUTATION FOR CLICKBAIT AND MEDIABAIT WITH CONSPIRACY THEORIES: SPECULA…
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-21 16:00:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782077063882498467
SEYMOUR HERSH’S REPUTATION FOR CLICKBAIT AND MEDIABAIT WITH CONSPIRACY THEORIES: SPECULATION NOT REPORTING
Seymour Hersh’s investigative methods and reporting style have drawn significant skepticism and criticism for several specific reasons:
Anonymous Sources: Hersh’s dependence on anonymous sources complicates the verification process, casting doubt on the reliability of his reporting. This reliance often puts the burden of trust entirely on his personal credibility rather than transparent evidence.
Controversial Claims: He frequently presents claims that challenge official narratives, such as his account of the Osama bin Laden raid. These claims, often unsupported by publicly verifiable evidence, position his reports closer to speculation, impacting his reputation for factual accuracy.
Institutional Backlash: Hersh’s focus on sensitive national security topics brings him into frequent conflict with U.S. government and military institutions. This has not only polarized opinion about his work but has also led to public disputes that question his interpretations and findings.
Criticism from Peers: Within the journalism community, Hersh faces criticism for practices that some argue breach journalistic ethics—specifically his speculative approach and opaque sourcing. This criticism undermines his standing among contemporaries who advocate for more rigorous standards.
Outdated Methods: The shift in journalism towards more accountability and transparency in sourcing and reporting contrasts sharply with Hersh’s traditional, less transparent methods. This discrepancy has made his work seem out of step with current journalistic standards, further inviting critique.
These factors collectively explain why Seymour Hersh’s work, despite its impact, invites skepticism and critique, affecting his credibility and the acceptance of his findings in the broader discourse on investigative journalism.
In other worse Hersh produces nonsense clickbait. 😉
Reply addressees: @AltPublishNow @RealPatrickWebb
Source date (UTC): 2024-04-21 16:00:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782077032626618368
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1782066706971836782