Curt Doolittle

Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • “That’s because the investigation was never intended to investigate crimes. It w

    —“That’s because the investigation was never intended to investigate crimes. It was meant to generate them.”—Ana Stowe #Trump

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 23:13:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/992180255078146048

  • Unfortunately, it’s true. Hence the severity of the problem

    Unfortunately, it’s true. Hence the severity of the problem….

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 22:24:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/992168024957317120

    Reply addressees: @georgiegirl1828

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/992074033658322944

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/992074033658322944

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 20:09:00 UTC

  • WE GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR. READ IT. COMMENT. @[100009672279790:2048:Ri

    http://freetheanimal.com/2018/05/synchronicity-libertarians-conservatives.htmlHOW WE GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR. READ IT. COMMENT.

    @[100009672279790:2048:Richard Nikoley] Covers the intertemporal division of perception, cognition, labor, and advocacy.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 18:57:00 UTC

  • WE GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR. READ IT. COMMENT. Richard Nikoley Covers th

    http://freetheanimal.com/2018/05/synchronicity-libertarians-conservatives.htmlHOW WE GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR. READ IT. COMMENT.

    Richard Nikoley Covers the intertemporal division of perception, cognition, labor, and advocacy.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 18:57:00 UTC

  • The Heavy Burden of Actually Thinking (sarcasm)

    ( Curt Doolittle > Paul Conroy ) (counter-ad-hom) I dunno Paul, most thinkers come up with one or two innovations, and I’ve come up with at least two, if not three or more. And, um, the ‘masses’ hardly are able to comprehend my dense operationally-grammared, SAT-word, syntheses, which is fairly common knowledge, and my average follower closer to 140 than the 110 island-120-wanna-be’s. But you know, I could be wrong. And if you could put together an argument of any kind whatsoever, perhaps you could be right. So far you’re just a pleb, a punk, a soyboy, and an incel using your cat as a sex toy…… And all you’re doing is providing me with entertainment value. Which honestly, I do appreciate, since the heavy burden of actually thinking for a living can be draining. (You see, you can’t really do that from a chair at the academy. Which is unfortunate, because it’s needed. And often.)

  • The Heavy Burden of Actually Thinking (sarcasm)

    ( Curt Doolittle > Paul Conroy ) (counter-ad-hom) I dunno Paul, most thinkers come up with one or two innovations, and I’ve come up with at least two, if not three or more. And, um, the ‘masses’ hardly are able to comprehend my dense operationally-grammared, SAT-word, syntheses, which is fairly common knowledge, and my average follower closer to 140 than the 110 island-120-wanna-be’s. But you know, I could be wrong. And if you could put together an argument of any kind whatsoever, perhaps you could be right. So far you’re just a pleb, a punk, a soyboy, and an incel using your cat as a sex toy…… And all you’re doing is providing me with entertainment value. Which honestly, I do appreciate, since the heavy burden of actually thinking for a living can be draining. (You see, you can’t really do that from a chair at the academy. Which is unfortunate, because it’s needed. And often.)

  • The lack of depth of even the most ambitious lay thinkers never ceases to amaze

    The lack of depth of even the most ambitious lay thinkers never ceases to amaze me. I expect compartmentalizational ignorance from members of the academy, but the laity has no such excuse to specialize. I hear IQ this and that from people the time, and as far as I can tell, endless curiosity, extreme suspicion of your intuitions, the continuous accumulation of knowledge, and the continuous reformation of your frames in response to that knowledge is what creates ‘depth’. And as far as I know, Durant was right: that depth is most likely from the study of one or more dimensions of history- for it is demonstrated history – not justified – that tells us the truth of man.

    (someone harassing me me nonsense today)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 17:03:00 UTC

  • I don’t have the luxury of those arguments because I’m not trying to make excuse

    I don’t have the luxury of those arguments because I’m not trying to make excuses for the past, only to correct the present, and prevent catastrophes in the future.

    The fact that a people can do well in a germanic country says nothing about them and everything about the germanic country.

    The question I want to solve is HOW DO YOU MAKE DENMARK WITHOUT DANES?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 11:47:00 UTC

  • ( Curt Doolittle > Paul Conroy ) (counter-ad-hom) I dunno Paul, most thinkers co

    ( Curt Doolittle > Paul Conroy ) (counter-ad-hom)

    I dunno Paul, most thinkers come up with one or two innovations, and I’ve come up with at least two, if not three or more. And, um, the ‘masses’ hardly are able to comprehend my dense operationally-grammared, SAT-word, syntheses, which is fairly common knowledge, and my average follower closer to 140 than the 110 island-120-wanna-be’s. But you know, I could be wrong. And if you could put together an argument of any kind whatsoever, perhaps you could be right. So far you’re just a pleb, a punk, a soyboy, and an incel using your cat as a sex toy…… And all you’re doing is providing me with entertainment value. Which honestly, I do appreciate, since the heavy burden of actually thinking for a living can be draining.

    (You see, you can’t really do that from a chair at the academy. Which is unfortunate, because it’s needed. And often.)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 08:58:00 UTC