—“It is more fun, and more reliable to slaughter other peoples sacred cows. But, tis best not to expect others to kill their own, at least not without assistance.”—Neil A. Bucklew
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 22:03:00 UTC
—“It is more fun, and more reliable to slaughter other peoples sacred cows. But, tis best not to expect others to kill their own, at least not without assistance.”—Neil A. Bucklew
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 22:03:00 UTC
–“TLDR”–
Well, it just means you’re too stupid for propertarianism and testimonialism. Please see comic books, anime, superhero movies, and continental philosophy…..
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 22:02:00 UTC
(humor) Q: What’s the difference between Derrida and his critics? A: Derrida says there is nothing outside the text. His critics say there is nothing inside his texts either. Q: What’s the difference between Heidegger and Carnap? A: Heidegger believed that his writings contain thoughts about Nothing, whereas Carnap believed that they contain thoughts about nothing. Q: What’s the difference between Heidegger, Sartre and Foucault? A: It’s just narcissism of small differences. All of them extolled the value of freedom (in theory), but in practice they all fell in love with various forms of totalitarianism. Heidegger supported Hitler, Sartre supported Stalin, and Foucault supported Khomeini.
(humor) Q: What’s the difference between Derrida and his critics? A: Derrida says there is nothing outside the text. His critics say there is nothing inside his texts either. Q: What’s the difference between Heidegger and Carnap? A: Heidegger believed that his writings contain thoughts about Nothing, whereas Carnap believed that they contain thoughts about nothing. Q: What’s the difference between Heidegger, Sartre and Foucault? A: It’s just narcissism of small differences. All of them extolled the value of freedom (in theory), but in practice they all fell in love with various forms of totalitarianism. Heidegger supported Hitler, Sartre supported Stalin, and Foucault supported Khomeini.
—“Talking of Nassim Nicholas Taleb, which book in your opinion defines him as a thinker?”–Marsden Katana I think everything you need to know is in Black Swan and he’s slowly moving my direction (involuntary warranty) versus voluntary “skin in the game”, through each of his books. I think he finally figured out that the data necessary to produce outliers is more expensive to obtain than the returns, and so he’s started to come around to legal restraint rather than solving the quantitative problem. In other words, he’s moved to falsification rather than justification.
—“Talking of Nassim Nicholas Taleb, which book in your opinion defines him as a thinker?”–Marsden Katana I think everything you need to know is in Black Swan and he’s slowly moving my direction (involuntary warranty) versus voluntary “skin in the game”, through each of his books. I think he finally figured out that the data necessary to produce outliers is more expensive to obtain than the returns, and so he’s started to come around to legal restraint rather than solving the quantitative problem. In other words, he’s moved to falsification rather than justification.
*My Favorite Facebook Intro Statement
(sarcastic humor)
—“I am the evil white male your trans-black feminist gender studies professor warned you about.”— Kelly Wilson
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 15:02:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1005827561484582914
(humor)
Q: What’s the difference between Derrida and his critics?
A: Derrida says there is nothing outside the text. His critics say there is nothing inside his texts either.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 13:12:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1005799762883416065