Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-22 07:40:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2014/07/02/obama-george-w-bush-quinnipiac-poll-reagan-clinton/11985837/https://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2014/07/02/obama-george-w-bush-quinnipiac-poll-reagan-clinton/11985837/


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-21 21:59:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2014/07/02/obama-george-w-bush-quinnipiac-poll-reagan-clinton/11985837/

    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-21 21:59:00 UTC

  • Not Starbucks no. Other shops yes. Preferably not chains

    Not Starbucks no. Other shops yes. Preferably not chains.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-21 21:58:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1009918506727608325

    Reply addressees: @JonasBr58673834

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1009911377123774470


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1009911377123774470

  • Equality? Are you kidding? One step above pets that lack house-training. They sh

    Equality? Are you kidding? One step above pets that lack house-training. They should have owners, licenses, rabies and other disease shots, and be neutered like all other domesticated pets.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-21 19:45:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1009885078078590976

  • RAGNAR REDBEARD AND NIETZCHE: INTRODUCTIONS TO ARISTOCRATIC ETHICS OF PROPERTARI

    RAGNAR REDBEARD AND NIETZCHE: INTRODUCTIONS TO ARISTOCRATIC ETHICS OF PROPERTARIANISM

    —“Have you ever read Might is Right? I’m almost finished it. I’d like to know your thoughts on the topic. Can you explain how it relates to Propertarianism?”— Kelly Wilson

    Ragnar Redbeard (Arthur Desmond)

    – Might is Right

    Nietzche:

    – The Birth of Tragedy

    – The Geneology of Morals

    – Beyond Good and Evil

    – The Will to Power

    1) The book Might is Right was written in 1890 as a derivation of Nietzsche – written in English by a Briton, with the ‘clarity’ of anglo sentiments, rather than the ‘romanticized’ prose of German sentiments. In that sense it should be taken as a more aggressive anglo restatement of Nietzsche’s works published at that time.

    2) Nietzsche’s works and Redbeard’s (Arthur Desmond), were followed by the social darwinist and eugenics movements, especially (British) Herbert Spencer’s thought. They were extremely popular pre-war. (And should have remained so. That failure will haunt us for centuries.)

    3) Neither Nietzsche nor Redbeard solved the problem of replacing ‘slave’ (jewish and christian) morality with aristocratic morality for the simple reason that they did not understand aristocratic morality’s origins in germanic common law. We do see that Hayek, by the late 1970’s has begun to understand but he was german again, and too ‘tepid’, where the more aggressive British Keynes and American Rawls, and the very, very, aggressive ashkenazi marxists and socialists were more successful.

    4) I have, I think, in propertarianism, completed the scientific explanation of our ancient heroic morality – although I am frequently criticized for writing it so legally and dryly. Most men want something more romantic (german), or passionate (anglo), or spiritual (Italian). When in reality, it is the Russians who have begun to practice it – absence the commitment to truth and sovereignty and reciprocity. They have at least taken on the Aryan Ambition.

    5) So I would say that Ragnar Redbeard is a great … let us say, Young Adult Literary introduction to aristocracy and Propertarianism, yes. Just as Nietzsche is a freshman college introduction to aristocratic ethics and Propertarianism. Where Propertarianism is a bit like the graduate school version of both. Meaning that those are both works of literary inspiration, where Propertarianism is literally ‘The Natural Law Of Reciprocity of Sovereign Peoples: The Law of Aristocratic Egalitarians.”

    Hope that helps

    Curt


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-21 16:24:00 UTC

  • They’re pets that lack house-training.

    (humor) Equality? Are you kidding? They’re pets that lack house-training. They should have owners, licenses, rabies and other disease shots, and be neutered like all other domesticated animals, and be subject to strict import regulations. šŸ˜‰

  • They’re pets that lack house-training.

    (humor) Equality? Are you kidding? They’re pets that lack house-training. They should have owners, licenses, rabies and other disease shots, and be neutered like all other domesticated animals, and be subject to strict import regulations. šŸ˜‰

  • (humor) I mean, domesticated animals are fine – assuming that you can take over

    (humor) I mean, domesticated animals are fine – assuming that you can take over their dominance hierarchy and train them, keep them in a pen, control their reproduction, put them to useful work, and/or eat them. Otherwise their wild animals. you’re just frequently confused that some wild animals can use some form of language. The fact that parrots can do the same doesn’t mean we give them legal standing, citizenship, and voting rights.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-21 16:02:00 UTC

  • (humor) Equality? Are you kidding? They’re pets that lack house-training. They s

    (humor)

    Equality? Are you kidding? They’re pets that lack house-training. They should have owners, licenses, rabies and other disease shots, and be neutered like all other domesticated animals, and be subject to strict import regulations. šŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2018-06-21 15:45:00 UTC