Trying to figure out if Milo’s stock is going up or down….
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-29 01:08:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012503101813772289
Trying to figure out if Milo’s stock is going up or down….
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-29 01:08:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012503101813772289
How on earth can you come to the conclusion that Journalists are anything other than Gossips spreading bad news (“bad is news, good is marketing”), appealing to masses’ baser instincts, promoting the marxist-postmodern critique of western civilization, steeped in bias?
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-29 00:32:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012493855915114502
Reply addressees: @SalenaZito
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012461733712158720
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012461733712158720
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
Retweeted WeWuzMetokur (@WeWuzMetokur):
He tried to warn you. https://t.co/gQHqgVXRgu
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-29 00:21:22 UTC
Well, we knew it was their long game. But yes, it’s easier to fight a battle against their objective rather than their perpetual deluge of straw men.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-29 00:18:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012490577525592066
Reply addressees: @RealJamesWoods @TheDemocrats
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012395633976590336
IN REPLY TO:
@RealJamesWoods
Finally the mask is off. Here are @TheDemocrats, ladies and gentlemen: https://t.co/pz5LBdXN2e
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012395633976590336
I love your ability to dig up insights – which is why you’re one of the few people I follow regularly – but … there are just some things that are both obvious upon consideration, but (a) I wouldn’t want to consider, and (b) i just don’t want to know about whatsoever. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-29 00:17:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012490148523790338
Reply addressees: @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012354439708073985
IN REPLY TO:
@DegenRolf
Only gay men whose anal intercourse behavior is predominantly receptive have a greater number of older brothers than do heterosexual men. https://t.co/v5rgmxMIjS https://t.co/VUkwZyYpDB
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012354439708073985
True.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-29 00:13:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012489111544975366
Reply addressees: @AffirmativRight
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012488746112086016
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1012488746112086016
Reason Magazine is an archetypal example of the selective measurement of ascendant male interests.
<--Female--------Ascendent Male-------Established Male--> ....Consumption...Production...........Preservation... ....Short Term....Medium Term..........Long Term..... ....Socialism.....Libertarian..........Aristocracy.... ....Gossip........Exchange.............Force.........
(a) What deltas in Capital do Reason Magazine’s editors and authors not account for? (Classical – Jewish Blending) (b) How does Mises Differ from Cato and Reason? (Jewish) (c) How does Reason differ from Cato Institute? (Classical) (d) How does Heritage differ from Cato? (Burkeian) (e) Where does each sit on this scale? Notice that there are no German think tanks in the USA on the right, only on the left. In the end the rider (passenger) is incognizant of the elephant. We are gene machines. And our differences are due largely to genetics. And those genetics are the result of degree of Neoteny and distribution of gender dimorphism, and the degree of uncorrected (not yet selected out) error (defect) in those genes.
Reason Magazine is an archetypal example of the selective measurement of ascendant male interests.
<--Female--------Ascendent Male-------Established Male--> ....Consumption...Production...........Preservation... ....Short Term....Medium Term..........Long Term..... ....Socialism.....Libertarian..........Aristocracy.... ....Gossip........Exchange.............Force.........
(a) What deltas in Capital do Reason Magazine’s editors and authors not account for? (Classical – Jewish Blending) (b) How does Mises Differ from Cato and Reason? (Jewish) (c) How does Reason differ from Cato Institute? (Classical) (d) How does Heritage differ from Cato? (Burkeian) (e) Where does each sit on this scale? Notice that there are no German think tanks in the USA on the right, only on the left. In the end the rider (passenger) is incognizant of the elephant. We are gene machines. And our differences are due largely to genetics. And those genetics are the result of degree of Neoteny and distribution of gender dimorphism, and the degree of uncorrected (not yet selected out) error (defect) in those genes.
Retweeted GroyperBot20K (@KANTBOT20K):
As a libertarian I believe the market has once again achieved the most efficient result, the commodification of tragedy by the media has culminated in active shooters simply attacking news outlets directly thereby cutting out the school middle man and reducing child-waste
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 22:39:00 UTC
https://t.co/Xf81QslUbdhttps://t.co/Xf81QslUbdRetweeted Kevin MacDonald (@TOOEdit):
Here’s some more:
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-28 21:43:00 UTC