Curt Doolittle

Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • painful truth. 😉

    https://t.co/s6xNKO1OrfAnother painful truth. 😉 https://t.co/s6xNKO1Orf

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 10:14:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/your_posts/37188214_10156495272982264_8153095894980362240_n_10

    photos_and_videos/your_posts/37188214_10156495272982264_8153095894980362240_n_10

    photos_and_videos/your_posts/37188214_10156495272982264_8153095894980362240_n_10156495272977264.jpg GOOD START – NOT AMBITIOUS ENOUGH. ;)Cary MorrisGood teeth. Definitely not carb/sugar eaters.Jul 14, 2018 9:43amSkye StewartUnrelated, but does not this seem mistaken to you,

    https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1017403089890902016Jul 14, 2018 9:51amJames SantagataThere’s always a dentist in the crowd. lolJul 14, 2018 9:55amCurt DoolittleTWEETED REPONSE

    Um. Let me help y’all. It’s COSTS. For libertarians especially, and conservatives in general, interpersonal connections come at higher costs. These web sites effectively suggest that they offer opportunities at lower interpersonal COST. (All behavior is cost driven & costs vary.)Jul 14, 2018 10:00amCJ Vandal[A glass of scotch swirls slowly in the distance]Jul 14, 2018 10:51amWillem O’BrienI want a throne made of thoseJul 14, 2018 11:19amWilliam Douglas HamiltonI prefer heads preserved in formaldehyde jars tbqh famJul 14, 2018 11:28amCurt DoolittleIt’s oK. you can bring your lunch if you want to. ;)Jul 14, 2018 11:31amWillem O’BrienFormaldehyde smells like SHIT fam

    Makes me pass out too I swear it wasnt the dead bodies hahaJul 14, 2018 11:33amTim SpillanePic related.Jul 14, 2018 11:50amNoah J RevoyLook, its a liberty mountain.Jul 14, 2018 12:00pmCurt DoolittleNoah J Revoy omg that’s funnyJul 14, 2018 12:03pmTim SpillaneWell the Aztecs were certainly ambitious, though it seems they may have been going after the wrong people: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOz7a2oEgrQJul 14, 2018 12:07pmTim KhilWe need buildings of reinforced skullcreteJul 14, 2018 5:29pmAndrew Clayton*winning*Jul 15, 2018 3:54amGOOD START – NOT AMBITIOUS ENOUGH. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 09:17:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/37188214_10156495272982264_81530958

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/37188214_10156495272982264_81530958

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/37188214_10156495272982264_8153095894980362240_n_10156495272977264.jpg GOOD START – NOT AMBITIOUS ENOUGH. ;)Cary MorrisGood teeth. Definitely not carb/sugar eaters.Jul 14, 2018 9:43amSkye StewartUnrelated, but does not this seem mistaken to you,

    https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1017403089890902016Jul 14, 2018 9:51amJames SantagataThere’s always a dentist in the crowd. lolJul 14, 2018 9:55amCurt DoolittleTWEETED REPONSE

    Um. Let me help y’all. It’s COSTS. For libertarians especially, and conservatives in general, interpersonal connections come at higher costs. These web sites effectively suggest that they offer opportunities at lower interpersonal COST. (All behavior is cost driven & costs vary.)Jul 14, 2018 10:00amCJ Vandal[A glass of scotch swirls slowly in the distance]Jul 14, 2018 10:51amWilliam Douglas HamiltonI prefer heads preserved in formaldehyde jars tbqh famJul 14, 2018 11:28amCurt DoolittleIt’s oK. you can bring your lunch if you want to. ;)Jul 14, 2018 11:31amTim SpillanePic related.Jul 14, 2018 11:50amNoah J RevoyLook, its a liberty mountain.Jul 14, 2018 12:00pmCurt Doolittle@[1749340484:2048:Noah J Revoy] omg that’s funnyJul 14, 2018 12:03pmTim SpillaneWell the Aztecs were certainly ambitious, though it seems they may have been going after the wrong people: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOz7a2oEgrQJul 14, 2018 12:07pmTim KhilWe need buildings of reinforced skullcreteJul 14, 2018 5:29pmAndrew Clayton*winning*Jul 15, 2018 3:54amGOOD START – NOT AMBITIOUS ENOUGH. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 09:17:00 UTC

  • (skull pyramid humor) >Julian Gerull If you have enemies, you will be bitter 😉

    (skull pyramid humor)

    >Julian Gerull

    If you have enemies, you will be bitter 😉

    >Jorn Birx

    Better to be bitter and enduring than content into oblivion.

    >Daniel Roland Anderson

    That’s why we stack skulls in pyramids.

    It’s part of an “outside the box” wellness program.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 08:32:00 UTC

  • —“I have a few questions if you don’t mind.”—

    —“I have a few questions if you don’t mind.”— 1) –“Besides Ostrom, what can I read if I want to understand more of the commons?”– Honestly, I don’t think there is else much worth reading. I would read the history of the common law which is in my book list. And I would read my definition of property in toto. 2) –“Who would you consider influential in the Chicago school for the insurer of last resort argument for the state?”– Becker and Friedman. Becker for method, and Friedman for Solutions, Hayek for integration with law, Coase for institutions. Just go thru the list of famous people from Chicago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_school_of_economics 3) —“And lastly, where can I read more on the proposed propertarian financial/monetary/banking system?”— I haven’t categorized (tagged) that group of ideas on the site, so it’s spread all over the place. I can’t spend 30 minutes doing a bunch of searches right now but I can think of a few that might be helpful. But understand, this is a very small part of the program: 1) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/12/10/whats-your-position-on-ubi-welfare-2-0/ 2) ***DE-FINANCIALIZATION: Definancialization of the Financial System. There is no reason we pay interest on consumer loans (and every reason we pay it on business and industrial loans). By nationalizing Mastercard, and issuing one every LEGAL AND FULLY INTEGRATED citizen, we can distribute liquidity (increase the money supply) by direct redistribution to the citizenry (in which case our homes would all be paid for because of the last recession), and consumer loans can be provided directly from the treasury. Furthermore, by professionalizing ‘banking’ (basically requiring series 7 for issuing loans via the treasury, and licensing as we do CPA’s), we can eliminate consumer interest, and cut payment periods in half or to one third. Additionally we make universities carry the zero interest loans on behalf of any student, and to obtain payment as a payroll deduction over a period of no more than ten years. This combination will mean that after about 15 years, the first time home owner will own his home free and clear, and the universities will no longer be able to offer junk degrees. I won’t go into the various extraordinary (wonderful) other consequences but this will restore the american people’s way of life and destroy the predatory financial, academic, and government sectors. There will be no other way to profit than the Silicon Valley (monarchy) model of investment in research, development, and industry. Financialism will be destroyed forever.*** 4) —“If I understand correctly, you’re proposing 100% reserves under fiat,”—  No, you must publish your ratios at all times, and hold to any ratio whenever a debt was initiated. You many not transfer originated debt. You can sell interest in that debt but must carry it. And lastly, given that most consumer lending would be from the treasury and without interest, this would apply largely to commercial relations. 5) —“while having at least two if not more parallel monies, one for savings (probably a gold standard) and one as a means of exchange (fiat e-cash),”— Multiple monies in general. I think my view is of far more than two. 6) —-With savings and investments happening under private banks while current accounts controlled by central bank). Is that correct?”—-  I see individual agents having relationships with the central bank for consumer credit, and very little need for them, without a bank as an intermediary.

  • —“I have a few questions if you don’t mind.”—

    —“I have a few questions if you don’t mind.”— 1) –“Besides Ostrom, what can I read if I want to understand more of the commons?”– Honestly, I don’t think there is else much worth reading. I would read the history of the common law which is in my book list. And I would read my definition of property in toto. 2) –“Who would you consider influential in the Chicago school for the insurer of last resort argument for the state?”– Becker and Friedman. Becker for method, and Friedman for Solutions, Hayek for integration with law, Coase for institutions. Just go thru the list of famous people from Chicago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_school_of_economics 3) —“And lastly, where can I read more on the proposed propertarian financial/monetary/banking system?”— I haven’t categorized (tagged) that group of ideas on the site, so it’s spread all over the place. I can’t spend 30 minutes doing a bunch of searches right now but I can think of a few that might be helpful. But understand, this is a very small part of the program: 1) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/12/10/whats-your-position-on-ubi-welfare-2-0/ 2) ***DE-FINANCIALIZATION: Definancialization of the Financial System. There is no reason we pay interest on consumer loans (and every reason we pay it on business and industrial loans). By nationalizing Mastercard, and issuing one every LEGAL AND FULLY INTEGRATED citizen, we can distribute liquidity (increase the money supply) by direct redistribution to the citizenry (in which case our homes would all be paid for because of the last recession), and consumer loans can be provided directly from the treasury. Furthermore, by professionalizing ‘banking’ (basically requiring series 7 for issuing loans via the treasury, and licensing as we do CPA’s), we can eliminate consumer interest, and cut payment periods in half or to one third. Additionally we make universities carry the zero interest loans on behalf of any student, and to obtain payment as a payroll deduction over a period of no more than ten years. This combination will mean that after about 15 years, the first time home owner will own his home free and clear, and the universities will no longer be able to offer junk degrees. I won’t go into the various extraordinary (wonderful) other consequences but this will restore the american people’s way of life and destroy the predatory financial, academic, and government sectors. There will be no other way to profit than the Silicon Valley (monarchy) model of investment in research, development, and industry. Financialism will be destroyed forever.*** 4) —“If I understand correctly, you’re proposing 100% reserves under fiat,”—  No, you must publish your ratios at all times, and hold to any ratio whenever a debt was initiated. You many not transfer originated debt. You can sell interest in that debt but must carry it. And lastly, given that most consumer lending would be from the treasury and without interest, this would apply largely to commercial relations. 5) —“while having at least two if not more parallel monies, one for savings (probably a gold standard) and one as a means of exchange (fiat e-cash),”— Multiple monies in general. I think my view is of far more than two. 6) —-With savings and investments happening under private banks while current accounts controlled by central bank). Is that correct?”—-  I see individual agents having relationships with the central bank for consumer credit, and very little need for them, without a bank as an intermediary.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“The irony is that it is only through a pr

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“The irony is that it is only through a profound amount of liberalism coupled with ideological courage that Curt Doolittle is able to diagnose a variety of issues with great accuracy.

    But [your prescription] sounds more like radical leftism repackaged. And though there might be some deterministic accuracy to the rise of radicalism in both forms (ends of the political spectrum), I personally would only die for one cause – individual liberty 🗽

    And history shows that this ideology (liberty) is closer to the broader human spirit than accidental ethnic relationships devoid of spirit and culture (real culture).

    Your worldview is self defeating in that your own ideas could have never come to fruition with the your vision of the future. (I do recognize that referring to yourself in such a way disarms the oppositions narrative) but at what cost?”—Rob Ellerman

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 16:16:30 UTC

  • HAPPENS WHEN THE PARASITES ARE REMOVED? by Luke Weinhagen What happens to the fe

    http://anepigone.blogspot.com/…/among-whiteshttp://anepigone.blogspot.com/…/among-whitesWHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE PARASITES ARE REMOVED?

    by Luke Weinhagen

    What happens to the fertility rate of the producers when the cost of the parasites is reduced and the traitors are removed.

    The big threat is internal. It is comprised of the parasites leaching the value from the producers and the traitors opening the gates from within.

    Some might see the vectors of populations in the chart above as a catastrophe. Pause that alarm for a moment and look deeper. It may instead be a badly needed, healthy and natural purge.

    If the data below is even close to accurate, rate of change depicted in the chart above may be reason to celebrate –

    Fertility Rate for Political Orientation (whites)

    =================================

    Extremely liberal (2.5%) — 1.61

    Liberal (12.7%) — 1.72

    Slightly liberal (11.3%) — 1.58

    Moderate (39.9%) — 2.14

    Slightly conservative (15.6%) — 2.03

    Conservative (14.3%) — 2.34

    Extremely conservative (3.7%) — 2.62

    Imagine what happens to the fertility rate of the producers when the cost of the parasites is reduced and the traitors are removed.

    (CURT: Depends upon the moderates.About 1/3 is conservative. If given the choice the moderates – a bit more than a third maybe – we might get a good polity. It’s by dumping the left we get all the gains. And look at a future where the underclass AND some of the working class are unemployable….)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 12:24:00 UTC

  • HAPPENS WHEN THE PARASITES ARE REMOVED? by Luke Weinhagen What happens to the fe

    http://anepigone.blogspot.com/…/among-whitesWHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE PARASITES ARE REMOVED?

    by Luke Weinhagen

    What happens to the fertility rate of the producers when the cost of the parasites is reduced and the traitors are removed.

    The big threat is internal. It is comprised of the parasites leaching the value from the producers and the traitors opening the gates from within.

    Some might see the vectors of populations in the chart above as a catastrophe. Pause that alarm for a moment and look deeper. It may instead be a badly needed, healthy and natural purge.

    If the data below is even close to accurate, rate of change depicted in the chart above may be reason to celebrate –

    Fertility Rate for Political Orientation (whites)

    =================================

    Extremely liberal (2.5%) — 1.61

    Liberal (12.7%) — 1.72

    Slightly liberal (11.3%) — 1.58

    Moderate (39.9%) — 2.14

    Slightly conservative (15.6%) — 2.03

    Conservative (14.3%) — 2.34

    Extremely conservative (3.7%) — 2.62

    Imagine what happens to the fertility rate of the producers when the cost of the parasites is reduced and the traitors are removed.

    (CURT: Depends upon the moderates.About 1/3 is conservative. If given the choice the moderates – a bit more than a third maybe – we might get a good polity. It’s by dumping the left we get all the gains. And look at a future where the underclass AND some of the working class are unemployable….)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 12:24:00 UTC

  • “The irony is that it is only through a profound amount of liberalism coupled wi

    —“The irony is that it is only through a profound amount of liberalism coupled with ideological courage that Curt Doolittle is able to diagnose a variety of issues with great accuracy.

    But [your prescription] sounds more like radical leftism repackaged. And though there might be some deterministic accuracy to the rise of radicalism in both forms (ends of the political spectrum), I personally would only die for one cause – individual liberty 🗽

    And history shows that this ideology (liberty) is closer to the broader human spirit than accidental ethnic relationships devoid of spirit and culture (real culture).

    Your worldview is self defeating in that your own ideas could have never come to fruition with the your vision of the future. (I do recognize that referring to yourself in such a way disarms the oppositions narrative) but at what cost?”—Rob Ellerman

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 12:16:00 UTC