Psychologism is a feminine means of disapproval and shaming – an ad hominem to circumvent arguments. Note that they addresses not the truth or falsehood but demonstrate the usual lack of agency by simply disapproving – as if their sexual, social, and political market value had any value other than the empirical confirmation of their lack of intelligence, agency, and argument – thats before we consider intellectual honesty. Although, admittedly, they have a gender-biased lack of agency, without which one cannot possess intellectual honesty. We are no longer so dependent upon one another and as such separation of those who lack agency from those of us who do is simply in our personal, social, reproductive, kin, and civilizational interests.
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
Psychologism
Psychologism is a feminine means of disapproval and shaming – an ad hominem to circumvent arguments. Note that they addresses not the truth or falsehood but demonstrate the usual lack of agency by simply disapproving – as if their sexual, social, and political market value had any value other than the empirical confirmation of their lack of intelligence, agency, and argument – thats before we consider intellectual honesty. Although, admittedly, they have a gender-biased lack of agency, without which one cannot possess intellectual honesty. We are no longer so dependent upon one another and as such separation of those who lack agency from those of us who do is simply in our personal, social, reproductive, kin, and civilizational interests.
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-26 20:12:57 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-26 19:55:54 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-26 18:26:16 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-26 18:11:58 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-26 18:09:23 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-26 18:04:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-26 16:12:00 UTC
-

photos_and_videos/your_posts/37796179_10156523236067264_574130006695870464_o_101
photos_and_videos/your_posts/37796179_10156523236067264_574130006695870464_o_10156523236062264.jpg Andrew Clayton>Zuck says “holocaust deniers” deserve free speech too
>Looses $100b in a single day’s trading and market proposes leadership change
🤔🤔🤔🤔Jul 26, 2018 4:09pmJonathan WilburOf all the things they could possibly cite that Zucc has done, “election meddling” and conservatives doing something that liberals do all the time was their concern. 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔Jul 26, 2018 4:10pmJonathan WilburDang, that’s a really hot take. There might be something to that.Jul 26, 2018 4:11pmWilliam McFarlandHey! Don’t go noticing cohencidences!Jul 26, 2018 4:12pmJohn MattisonWtf i love zucc nowJul 26, 2018 6:24pmThiago Modelborn Pereira-BerthoYesterday fakebook shut down 300 right wing pages in Brazil. Some had millions of followers.Jul 26, 2018 7:38pmFrancis ZhouReminiscent of Bill Gates vs DoJ episode circa 1999, in both cases the founder/CEO ran afoul of some power in the government. I wonder if Bill coached Zucc in the art of dealing with the government.Jul 26, 2018 9:45pmAlex Paretoisn’t the CEO also being the chairman considered bad business practice anywayJul 28, 2018 8:17pm
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-26 16:02:00 UTC