I’m actually a fan of splatter painting since I recognize it not as art but as decoration. I don’t consider tattoo’s art, nor the decoration of dinner plates art, and I don’t consider splatter painting art, but decoration. And as decoration of the modern postwar apartment it served its purpose. Postwar art in particular, due to (((certain))) influences, is decoration, not art. And decoration is just fine. Especially for apartment living.
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. LET ME HELP: UNDERSTANDING THE BASICS OF ART
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
LET ME HELP: UNDERSTANDING THE BASICS OF ART
DIMENSIONS OF MEASUREMENT
There are three dimensions of art criticism:
– Craftsmanship (includes materials)
– Design (the play of order(composition) and bounty(beauty) and perception)
– Content (the content and values of that content)
All art can be judged by triangulation (comparison) along these three axis. There is no possible cardinality to art but ordinality can be achieved by recursive triangulation.
ALL ART BEGINS WITH MONUMENTAL ARCHITECTURE AND DEVOLVES TO DECORATION AND HANDCRAFTS
– Monumental Architecture is self selecting due to cost.
– Monumental Sculpture is self selecting due to cost.
– Monumental Painting is self selecting due to cost.
– Life Size Representationalism (not photorealism) in painting is self selecting due to cost (hours).
HOWEVER
– Painting, Print, and Photography are not self selecting.
They are middle, working, and lower class substitutes for monuments.
– Even for the upper middle and upper class, and out-of-sight class, the few pieces of quality art that are canon (mentioned in art magazines and books, and references, or which had popular press) are inaccessible. Demand is just too high. So given the high signal value of art (yes it is an extreme expression of dominance), the market has had to experiment with novelty in order to satisfy demand.
Much of what ordinary people rail against is the same as railing against fashion: for those in the fashion industries (of which display art is a member) novelty has to function as a substitute for scarcity of craftsmanship quality (note my particular distaste for the so called ‘art glass’ industry).
AS SUCH
– Monumental works convey ideas (allegiances, heroics, beauty)
– The demand for low cost high production ‘decoration’
(a) may form an icon or ‘remembrance’.
(b) may decorate the environment.
(c) may reflect the monumental, life sized, and representational, is misplaced in non monumental size (which is what most of us intuit as great work).
IN OTHER WORDS
– Monumental work is misplaced in most homes and offices in market (business) and is generally reserved for the political and institutional and aristocratic.
– Most homes cannot support monumental work and require only design (decoration).
– Most people are actually not capable of design, or capable of acquiring the monumental.
– As such the colorful, abstract, the impressionistic, are to homes as type design and color pallet are to print and display advertising.
IN OTHER WORDS
– when people purchase relatively well made ‘design’ (abstract, gestural, impressionistic) of architectural size (to fill a wall) they are practicing good aesthetics (not acting on pretense).
– when people pay homage to the monumental in private spaces, they are practicing good aesthetics. (small engineering drawings, paintings of flowers, well constructed prints)
– when people pay homage to the monumental in architectural spaces (your living room, hallway, or dining room, or office) you are (a) alienating others, and (b)
PERSONAL: ALLORA AND I
We purchased a detailed mezzotint (print) of an elaborately painstakingly made tree that is about four or five feet tall in all, and framed in a wide matte and black frame. This was the centerpeice of the livingroom between two custom made bookcases.
And in the center of the living room we had a glass table with her art jewelry collection and work. And Allora decorated a hallway with dozens of small pieces of framed photographs, etchings, mezzotints, and collections of remembrances.
THE DESTRUCTION OF WEST VIA DESTRUCTION OF ARTS LITERATURE HISTORY LAW AND SCIENCE.
Allora and I were a rare couple because we were the last generation that could be ‘cultured’ – you actually can’t get an art education any longer. You can’t get a liberal arts education any longer (the whig history). The marxists have destroyed art on purpose just as they have destroyed literature, academics, law, and history. It is nearly impossible to ‘be cultured’ in the aristocratic sense any longer. And it was destroyed on purpose by (((the marxists, socialists and postmodernists))).
WE MUST ONCE AGIAN BE WARRIORS SO OUR CHILDREN CAN BE COMPETITIVE SO OUR GRAND CHILDREN CAN BE ARTISTS.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 20:13:18 UTC
-
REMINDER: WHEN YOU ASK ME TO REVIEW WORK I WILL DO SO – BUT YOU COST ME TIME. HE
REMINDER: WHEN YOU ASK ME TO REVIEW WORK I WILL DO SO – BUT YOU COST ME TIME. HENCE DON’T GIVE ME POSTMODERN JUNK.
Review of a Bolivian Paper on the Alt Right.
(ouch. remember that if you ask me to review academic work I will do my job. And if you are giving me postmodern drivel I’m gonna be very unkind in my analysis)
0) First, I can improve on the understanding of the manifesto section a bit. However I am extremely critical if not hostile to the method of argument you are using because it contains nothing testable and as far as I can tell is just postmodern critique. So I won’t comment on it.
1) The correct framing would be that the current generation of thinkers has adopted the marxist techniques (ridicule, shaming, rallying) simply by being exposed to them for decades.
2) The movement was made possible by a)end of socialism, b) genetics, c) cog sci (d)immigration.
3) the movement is merely a cyclical return to nationalism in the face of immigration – first Hispanic since hispanics have one to one replacement of whites, but secondly and more emphatically, muslim immigration which we perceive as even more hostile than jewish.
4) Trump is an ally of the alt right simply because he is pursuing a strategy of nationalism and the restoration of the balance of powers instead of the single superpower of America that is too expensive for Americans to continue paying for.
5) the alt right is possible because the internet allows people who are naturally apolitical to mirror the propaganda strategy of the marxists who are highly political. So the economics of collaboration have been reversed from favoring the left to the right.
6) closing down stormfront and others merely drove the movement to use symbolic language, private message boards, video and podcasts, and made it possible for the right leadership to charge money for content. It backfired.
7) For the rest of the article I had to give up translating and reading at page 50 because (a)you do not put forth a testable argument and then demonstrate how you defend it, and (b)you then engage in opinion measurement (intellectual gossip) rather than any form of measurement.
8) This kind of argument passes for pseudo-academic work in literature (its all they have to measure) but not in social science where it is nothing more than formally outlined gossip.
9) I am sorry if this offends, but you have clearly been taught that this form of argument is acceptable academic work. It isn’t.
https://www.academia.edu/36845752/El_esquema_ideol%C3%B3gico_de_la_derecha_alternativa
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 17:35:00 UTC
-
REMINDER: WHEN YOU ASK ME TO REVIEW WORK I WILL DO SO – BUT YOU COST ME TIME. HE
REMINDER: WHEN YOU ASK ME TO REVIEW WORK I WILL DO SO – BUT YOU COST ME TIME. HENCE DON’T GIVE ME POSTMODERN JUNK.
Review of a Bolivian Paper on the Alt Right.
(ouch. remember that if you ask me to review academic work I will do my job. And if you are giving me postmodern drivel I’m gonna be very unkind in my analysis)
0) First, I can improve on the understanding of the manifesto section a bit. However I am extremely critical if not hostile to the method of argument you are using because it contains nothing testable and as far as I can tell is just postmodern critique. So I won’t comment on it.
1) The correct framing would be that the current generation of thinkers has adopted the marxist techniques (ridicule, shaming, rallying) simply by being exposed to them for decades.
2) The movement was made possible by a)end of socialism, b) genetics, c) cog sci (d)immigration.
3) the movement is merely a cyclical return to nationalism in the face of immigration – first Hispanic since hispanics have one to one replacement of whites, but secondly and more emphatically, muslim immigration which we perceive as even more hostile than jewish.
4) Trump is an ally of the alt right simply because he is pursuing a strategy of nationalism and the restoration of the balance of powers instead of the single superpower of America that is too expensive for Americans to continue paying for.
5) the alt right is possible because the internet allows people who are naturally apolitical to mirror the propaganda strategy of the marxists who are highly political. So the economics of collaboration have been reversed from favoring the left to the right.
6) closing down stormfront and others merely drove the movement to use symbolic language, private message boards, video and podcasts, and made it possible for the right leadership to charge money for content. It backfired.
7) For the rest of the article I had to give up translating and reading at page 50 because (a)you do not put forth a testable argument and then demonstrate how you defend it, and (b)you then engage in opinion measurement (intellectual gossip) rather than any form of measurement.
8) This kind of argument passes for pseudo-academic work in literature (its all they have to measure) but not in social science where it is nothing more than formally outlined gossip.
9) I am sorry if this offends, but you have clearly been taught that this form of argument is acceptable academic work. It isn’t.
https://www.academia.edu/36845752/El_esquema_ideológico_de_la_derecha_alternativa https://www.academia.edu/36845752/El_esquema_ideol%C3%B3gico_de_la_derecha_alternativa
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 17:35:00 UTC
-
Yes when I quote you I edit your stuff – for posterity’s sake. 😉
Yes when I quote you I edit your stuff – for posterity’s sake. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 16:41:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle shared a post
Curt Doolittle shared a post.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 16:38:00 UTC
-
INTERESTING. This fellow cited me in a paper. The cite is my argument that there
INTERESTING.
This fellow cited me in a paper. The cite is my argument that there are no influential living philosophers, because science theorizing) has a higher standard of thought than philosophy (philosophizing).
It looks like he is working on a book. He has put out a handful of papers.
He has a very similar program in mind on science versus philosophy.
He is from Paris and writes in the french model (Cartesian Rationalist) not the german or english, but it’s all scientific.
What’s interesting is that he is in the Art business (as I used to be). Hopefully I get to chat with him at some point and expore his thinking a bit. Particularly the science – art axis.
Some of his paintings are attached. (I was trained in representationalism and art history so I’m kinda old fashioned compared to him.)
His artwork is successful. You have to break the 15k barrier, then the 30K barrier to make a good living at it. So he apparently is doing it.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/ulrich-de-balbian-5a080538/
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 16:31:27 UTC
-
SPLATTER PAINTING IS DECORATION NOT ART – AND THATS WHY ITS OK I’m actually a fa
SPLATTER PAINTING IS DECORATION NOT ART – AND THATS WHY ITS OK
I’m actually a fan of splatter painting since I recognize it not as art but as decoration. I don’t consider tattoo’s art, nor the decoration of dinner plates art, and I don’t consider splatter painting art, but decoration. And as decoration of the modern postwar apartment it served its purpose. Postwar art in particular, due to (((certain))) influences, is decoration, not art.
And decoration is just fine. Especially for apartment living.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 16:22:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link. —“What might happen to our society if race was n
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
—“What might happen to our society if race was no longer used as a form of identity?”—
Your question answers itself if asked operationally with correct grammar:
–âWhat would be the observable consequences if people no longer predicted peoples value, neutrality and threat by visible and behavioral traits.â–
The answer is that we would cease making use of the most accurate measurement in social sciences: stereotypes, and render ourselves interpersonally blind, and as such give unlimited opportunity to people who lie, cheat, scam, and steal.
Stereotypes are the most accurate empirical measurement of display(appearance), word(thought) and deed(action) because they are tested every single day by millions and millions of us.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 14:37:35 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle shared a link
Curt Doolittle shared a link.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-30 14:36:04 UTC