Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • AND THE FREQUENCY OF SEX Television and the frequency of sex by Tyler Cowen Augu

    http://www.nber.org/papers/w24882#fromrsshttp://www.nber.org/papers/w24882#fromrssTELEVISION AND THE FREQUENCY OF SEX

    Television and the frequency of sex

    by Tyler Cowen August 6, 2018 at 12:42 pm in Data Source Television

    Substitutes are indeed everywhere:

    —This paper examines the association between television ownership and coital frequency using data from nearly 4 million individuals in national household surveys in 80 countries from 5 continents. The results suggest that while television may not kill your sex life, it is associated with some sex life morbidity. Under our most conservative estimate, we find that television ownership is associated with approximately a 6% reduction in the likelihood of having had sex in the past week, consistent with a small degree of substitutability between television viewing and sexual activity. Household wealth and reproductive health knowledge do not appear to be driving this association.”—

    That is from a new NBER paper by Adrienne Lucas and Nicholas Wilson.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-07 16:14:00 UTC

  • “And so, faced with irrelevance, the Establishment howls, froths at the mouth an

    —“And so, faced with irrelevance, the Establishment howls, froths at the mouth and chews the carpet, raging at President Trump. Like a madman whose derangement is killing him, it screams meaningless words, most ending in “ism”, as it dies. I’m sure the President will give it a grand funeral.”— William S. Lind


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-07 15:03:00 UTC

  • My answer to Why don’t people like Jared Taylor, David Duke and Kevin MacDonald

    My answer to Why don’t people like Jared Taylor, David Duke and Kevin MacDonald appear on Quora to answer questions about ethnic conflict? Are they excluded? https://www.quora.com/Why-dont-people-like-Jared-Taylor-David-Duke-and-Kevin-MacDonald-appear-on-Quora-to-answer-questions-about-ethnic-conflict-Are-they-excluded/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-05 17:08:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1026152914568589312

  • Nietzsche Is a Doorway – He Gives You Permission.

    September 5th, 2018 10:11 AM

    [D]on’t get me wrong. Nietzsche is wonderful. Like Rand, he is a doorway for teenagers. The problem is getting stuck in Nietzsche/Rand/Marx world like some people get stuck in comic book, harry potter, and lord of the rings worlds. You know, they’re STAGES of using literature to gain meaning you are not able to access yet by more direct means – they are not ENDS.

  • Nietzsche Is a Doorway – He Gives You Permission.

    September 5th, 2018 10:11 AM

    [D]on’t get me wrong. Nietzsche is wonderful. Like Rand, he is a doorway for teenagers. The problem is getting stuck in Nietzsche/Rand/Marx world like some people get stuck in comic book, harry potter, and lord of the rings worlds. You know, they’re STAGES of using literature to gain meaning you are not able to access yet by more direct means – they are not ENDS.

  • Who’s fragile? If we’re fragile why are you so afraid of us?

    Who’s fragile? If we’re fragile why are you so afraid of us?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-04 23:40:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1025889225009451008

    Reply addressees: @lorenajw_x

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1025888573889773568


    IN REPLY TO:

    @lorenajw_x

    @curtdoolittle Well then you have some learning to do. But sorry to hear about your #whitefragility. Must be tough. Sending you thoughts and prayers during this hard time.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1025888573889773568

  • Paradigm Shifts

    Author: William S. Lind CD: 1 – Unipolar Power (Monopoly) vs return to balance of powers – nationalism (Markets). 2 – An Endless Supply of Money vs Return to ‘harder’ money (markets) 2 – Wilsonianism (Expansionary Democracy) vs Nationalism (Markets) 3 – Cultural Marxism (Anti-Whitism) vs Nationalism (Markets) 4 – The End of White Acquiescence. By William S Lind. The Establishment knows how to succeed in obtaining what it cares about, power and money, within the current paradigms. Those paradigms include America as the only real world power, before which all other nations must bow; an endless supply of money; Wilsonianism, i.e. forcing “democracy” down all other countries’ throats; and cultural Marxism, which seeks to put women over men, blacks over whites, and gays over straights (where they conflict, cultural Marxism takes precedence over democracy). But those paradigms are all beginning to shift. President Trump represents, at least in part, new paradigms which leave today’s Establishment irrelevant, isolated, and powerless. In response, the Establishment howls in fear and in hatred, especially hatred of a President who represents the heartland instead of the coastal elites. If we look at each of the above paradigms, we can see the shifts occurring. Not only does America lack the military power, money, and moral credit to dictate to every other country, all countries now face the challenge of Fourth Generation war, war waged by entities other than states. This challenge renders competition between states obsolete, something President Trump seems instinctively to grasp, at least in part. He knows a post-Communism Russian-American rivalry makes no strategic sense; he correctly thinks NATO is obsolete; and he may sense that states everywhere face crises of legitimacy, although of widely varying intensity. The Establishment howls because one of its major components, the Military-Industrial-Congressional complex must have “peer competitors”, other states it can inflate as threats, in order to justify the trillion dollars a year we spend on national security. F-35s, Ford-class aircraft carriers, and opposed amphibious landings have little relevance to 4GW. Meanwhile, the money is running out. The U.S., and most of the rest of the world, is heading for a colossal debt crisis. When it hits, we may not be able to afford $100 billion a year in defense, much less a trillion. This points to a third paradigm shift: the end of Wilsonianism. Our “defense” budget is really an offense budget. It supports a military that is supposed to force “democratic capitalism”, which is really oligarchic rent-seeking, down the throats of every people on earth — along with cultural Marxism and its definitions of “human rights”. Even if the money were not about to run out, Wilsonianism would be doomed from the start. Russell Kirk wrote, “There is no surer way to make a man your enemy than telling him you are going to remake him in your image for his own good.” Even Robespierre, too late, said that missionaries with bayonets are seldom welcome. President Trump grasps that attempts to turn places such as Afghanistan into Switzerland are foolish nonsense. Yet at the same time, he chose a neo-con, one of the people who tried to turn Iraq into a peaceful, secular democracy by invading it and destroying the state, as his national security advisor. So he still has a ways to go to ride this paradigm shift. ( cd: my view is that trump sees punishment until defeat and making ‘better choices’ rather than reconstruction in our demon-cratic image as his strategy and it’s working.) The last shift he not only grasps but rode into the White House on: the revolt of America’s heartland against political correctness, e.i., cultural Marxism. The Establishment either believes in cultural Marxism (most democrats) or is too cowardly to challenge it (most Republicans). Heartland voters are fed up with it, its advocates, and its sacred “victims” groups, most of whom distinguish themselves by their bad behavior. In a political battle between the coastal elites and their clients on the one hand and the heartland on the other, the heartland will win. Look at the percentage of whites among people who actually vote in all the swing states. The collapse of white acquiescence in cultural Marxism, both here and in Europe, may be the biggest paradigm shift of them all. And so, faced with irrelevance, the Establishment howls, froths at the mouth and chews the carpet, raging at President Trump. Like a madman whose derangement is killing him, it screams meaningless words, most ending in “ism”, as it dies. I’m sure the President will give it a grand funeral.

  • Paradigm Shifts

    Author: William S. Lind CD: 1 – Unipolar Power (Monopoly) vs return to balance of powers – nationalism (Markets). 2 – An Endless Supply of Money vs Return to ‘harder’ money (markets) 2 – Wilsonianism (Expansionary Democracy) vs Nationalism (Markets) 3 – Cultural Marxism (Anti-Whitism) vs Nationalism (Markets) 4 – The End of White Acquiescence. By William S Lind. The Establishment knows how to succeed in obtaining what it cares about, power and money, within the current paradigms. Those paradigms include America as the only real world power, before which all other nations must bow; an endless supply of money; Wilsonianism, i.e. forcing “democracy” down all other countries’ throats; and cultural Marxism, which seeks to put women over men, blacks over whites, and gays over straights (where they conflict, cultural Marxism takes precedence over democracy). But those paradigms are all beginning to shift. President Trump represents, at least in part, new paradigms which leave today’s Establishment irrelevant, isolated, and powerless. In response, the Establishment howls in fear and in hatred, especially hatred of a President who represents the heartland instead of the coastal elites. If we look at each of the above paradigms, we can see the shifts occurring. Not only does America lack the military power, money, and moral credit to dictate to every other country, all countries now face the challenge of Fourth Generation war, war waged by entities other than states. This challenge renders competition between states obsolete, something President Trump seems instinctively to grasp, at least in part. He knows a post-Communism Russian-American rivalry makes no strategic sense; he correctly thinks NATO is obsolete; and he may sense that states everywhere face crises of legitimacy, although of widely varying intensity. The Establishment howls because one of its major components, the Military-Industrial-Congressional complex must have “peer competitors”, other states it can inflate as threats, in order to justify the trillion dollars a year we spend on national security. F-35s, Ford-class aircraft carriers, and opposed amphibious landings have little relevance to 4GW. Meanwhile, the money is running out. The U.S., and most of the rest of the world, is heading for a colossal debt crisis. When it hits, we may not be able to afford $100 billion a year in defense, much less a trillion. This points to a third paradigm shift: the end of Wilsonianism. Our “defense” budget is really an offense budget. It supports a military that is supposed to force “democratic capitalism”, which is really oligarchic rent-seeking, down the throats of every people on earth — along with cultural Marxism and its definitions of “human rights”. Even if the money were not about to run out, Wilsonianism would be doomed from the start. Russell Kirk wrote, “There is no surer way to make a man your enemy than telling him you are going to remake him in your image for his own good.” Even Robespierre, too late, said that missionaries with bayonets are seldom welcome. President Trump grasps that attempts to turn places such as Afghanistan into Switzerland are foolish nonsense. Yet at the same time, he chose a neo-con, one of the people who tried to turn Iraq into a peaceful, secular democracy by invading it and destroying the state, as his national security advisor. So he still has a ways to go to ride this paradigm shift. ( cd: my view is that trump sees punishment until defeat and making ‘better choices’ rather than reconstruction in our demon-cratic image as his strategy and it’s working.) The last shift he not only grasps but rode into the White House on: the revolt of America’s heartland against political correctness, e.i., cultural Marxism. The Establishment either believes in cultural Marxism (most democrats) or is too cowardly to challenge it (most Republicans). Heartland voters are fed up with it, its advocates, and its sacred “victims” groups, most of whom distinguish themselves by their bad behavior. In a political battle between the coastal elites and their clients on the one hand and the heartland on the other, the heartland will win. Look at the percentage of whites among people who actually vote in all the swing states. The collapse of white acquiescence in cultural Marxism, both here and in Europe, may be the biggest paradigm shift of them all. And so, faced with irrelevance, the Establishment howls, froths at the mouth and chews the carpet, raging at President Trump. Like a madman whose derangement is killing him, it screams meaningless words, most ending in “ism”, as it dies. I’m sure the President will give it a grand funeral.

  • I thought it was Antifa that was doing all the damage…. I mean, it’s antifa th

    I thought it was Antifa that was doing all the damage…. I mean, it’s antifa that’s aggressive and hostile.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-04 19:30:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1025826427130847232

    Reply addressees: @johnpavlovitz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1025825892420018177


    IN REPLY TO:

    @johnpavlovitz

    @curtdoolittle Emboldened racists with weapons do damage to people.

    My name and face aren’t hidden.
    I can own my words and actions.
    I’m not afraid of them.
    I just recognize them for what they are.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1025825892420018177

  • UPDATE: Curt posted a quote that stated the killing wasn’t unnatural, but that w

    UPDATE: Curt posted a quote that stated the killing wasn’t unnatural, but that we needed institutions to suppress. This apparently violated community standards. We assume this was the result of an auto-filter of some sort, but it’s also possible that the usual stalkers sought to misrepresent it and report it.

    The review takes about 24 hours. Either that or 30 days.

    -The Propertarian Institute

    – We view this as harassment since Curt works very hard NOT to violate Facebook policies, and hate speech is not something he engages in.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-04 19:14:00 UTC