by Eric Best There is also a disconnect between day-to-day life and political reality. Even most people who are politically aware compartmentalize the daily grind (work, exercise, family, sleep, shopping, etc) and politics. Even as political disaster looms larger, it has the aspect of fiction. It exists while you pay attention to it, posting online or what have you, and when you wake up the next morning and enter the rat race it no longer seems as real. Yet in the halls of power, the gears never stop turning.
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
Compartmentalization Allows Boiling of The Frog (meaning “us”).
by Eric Best There is also a disconnect between day-to-day life and political reality. Even most people who are politically aware compartmentalize the daily grind (work, exercise, family, sleep, shopping, etc) and politics. Even as political disaster looms larger, it has the aspect of fiction. It exists while you pay attention to it, posting online or what have you, and when you wake up the next morning and enter the rat race it no longer seems as real. Yet in the halls of power, the gears never stop turning.
-
Why Include Rothbard and Mises with Marx and Marxists?
—“Q: I’m unsure of why Curt Doolittle grouped Rothbard and Mises with Marx, unless they were actually faux anti-Marxists?”– Matthew Genack Answer by Eli Harman They weren’t faux anti-marxists. They were sincere anti-Marxists. But what they offered in its place was justificationary pseudoscience, same as Marxism, differing in the details and conclusions, but not fundamentally in the methods.
-
Why Include Rothbard and Mises with Marx and Marxists?
—“Q: I’m unsure of why Curt Doolittle grouped Rothbard and Mises with Marx, unless they were actually faux anti-Marxists?”– Matthew Genack Answer by Eli Harman They weren’t faux anti-marxists. They were sincere anti-Marxists. But what they offered in its place was justificationary pseudoscience, same as Marxism, differing in the details and conclusions, but not fundamentally in the methods.
-
WHY INCLUDE ROTHBARD AND MISES WITH MARX AND MARXISTS? —“Q: I’m unsure of why
WHY INCLUDE ROTHBARD AND MISES WITH MARX AND MARXISTS?
—“Q: I’m unsure of why Curt Doolittle grouped Rothbard and Mises with Marx, unless they were actually faux anti-Marxists?”– Matthew… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=283488235581407&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-21 19:03:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1031980094192070656
-
Missed this one “The Answer To Marx”Updated Aug 21, 2018, 3:23 PM
Missed this one “The Answer To Marx”Updated Aug 21, 2018, 3:23 PM
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-21 15:23:00 UTC
-
I’ve also asked for a podcast or audio recording to distribute because this is w
http://www.libertymachinenews.com/on-alt-right-ideology-a-response-to-jeffrey-tucker.htmlFYI: I’ve also asked for a podcast or audio recording to distribute because this is worth a listen.Updated Aug 21, 2018, 10:23 AM
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-21 10:23:00 UTC
-
“The recent wave of censorship of conservative voices on the internet by tech gi
–“The recent wave of censorship of conservative voices on the internet by tech giants Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Apple mirrors a plan concocted by a coalition of George Soros-funded,… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=282842262312671&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-21 02:32:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1031730676972830720
-
“The recent wave of censorship of conservative voices on the internet by tech gi
–“The recent wave of censorship of conservative voices on the internet by tech giants Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Apple mirrors a plan concocted by a coalition of George Soros-funded, progressive groups to take back power in Washington from President Trump’s administration.
A confidential, 49-page memo for defeating Trump by working with the major social-media platforms to eliminate “right wing propaganda and fake news” was presented in January 2017 by Media Matters founder David Brock at a retreat in Florida with about 100 donors, the Washington Free Beacon reported at the time.
On Monday, the Gateway Pundit blog noted the memo’s relationship with recent moves by Silicon Valley tech giants to “shadow ban” conservative political candidates and pundits and remove content.
The Free Beacon obtained a copy of the memo, “Democracy Matters: Strategic Plan for Action,” by attending the retreat.
The memo spells out a four-year agenda that deployed Media Matters along with American Bridge, Shareblue and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) to attack Trump and Republicans. The strategies are impeachment, expanding Media Matters’ mission to combat “government misinformation,” ensuring Democratic control of the Senate in the 2018 midterm elections, filing lawsuits against the Trump administration, monetizing political advocacy, using a “digital attacker” to delegitimize Trump’s presidency and damage Republicans, and partnering with Facebook to combat “fake news.”
Quashing ‘fake news’ with ‘mathematical precision’
The Free Beacon in its January 2017 story said Brock sought to raise $40 million in 2017 for his organizations.
The document claims Media Matters and far-left groups have “access to raw data from Facebook, Twitter, and other social media sites” so they can “systemically monitor and analyze this unfiltered data.”
“The earlier we can identify a fake news story, the more effectively we can quash it,” the memo states. “With this new technology at our fingertips, researchers monitoring news in real time will be able to identify the origins of a lie with mathematical precision, creating an early warning system for fake news and disinformation.”
Media Matters met with Facebook, which boasts some 2 billion members worldwide, to discuss how to crack down on fake news, according to the memo.
The social media giant was provided with “a detailed map of the constellation of right-wing Facebook pages that had been the biggest purveyors of fake news.”
Brock’s memo also says Media Matters gave Google “the information necessary to identify 40 of the worst fake new sites” so they could be banned from Google’s advertising network.
The Gateway Pundit pointed out that in 2016, Google carried out that plan on the Gateway Pundit blog and other conservative sites, including Breitbart, the Drudge Report, Infowars, Zero Hedge and Conservative Treehouse.
Facebook, meanwhile has changed its newsfeed algorithm, ostensibly to combat “fake news,” causing a precipitous decline in traffic for many conservative sites.
President Donald Trump himself was affected, with his engagement on Facebook dropping by 45 percent.
A study in June by Gateway Pundit found Facebook had eliminated 93 percent of the traffic of top conservative news outlets.
Western Journal, in its own study, found that while left-wing publishers saw a roughly 2 percent increase in web traffic from Facebook following the algorithm changes, conservative sites saw a loss of traffic averaging around 14 percent.
‘Totalitarian impulse’ of the left
President Trump’s 2020 campaign manager charged last week the giants of Silicon Valley are stifling free speech, particularly conservative speech, manifesting the “inherent totalitarian impulse” of the left.
On Friday, Facebook appeared to be “shadow banning” the non-profit education site PragerU, founded by talk-host Dennis Prager, causing a drop in engagement of 99.9999 percent while removing two videos regarded as “hate speech.”
After Facebook rejected a highly inspirational ad for a Republican congressional candidate that included images depicting her parents’ persecution under the Khmer Rouge communist regime in Cambodia, Twitter followed up with its own ban.
WND reported earlier this month Facebook banned a pro-life video ad by a judicial candidate, giving the same explanation.
On Aug. 6, WND reported, Facebook, YouTube and Apple banned commentator Alex Jones and his Infowars website within hours of each other.
Last month, WND reported moderate Muslims and counter-terrorist activists were increasingly being restricted by Silicon Valley, while terrorist content remains on social-media platforms, according to researchers.
Trump campaign chief Parscale said last week the banning of Jones “will inevitably lead to the silencing of those with far less controversial opinions.”
“What we are seeing in Big Tech is the inherent totalitarian impulse of the Left come into full focus,” Parscale said.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-20 22:32:00 UTC
-
The Problem with Opposition to Propertarianism
The progress of our understanding from optimism and ignorance to pessimism and certainty.
|Evolution| Social Democracy -> Classical liberalism -> Libertarianism -> Anarcho Capitalism -> Neo-Reaction -> Propertarianism -> Fascism The problem with Propertarianism for other groups is that it’s law not literature, and as law it is unforgiving (intolerant) of falsehood, pretenses of knowledge or goodness whereas almost every other method of argument makes use of pretenses of truth, knowledge, and good in order to achieve an end that does NOT require truth, knowledge, and reciprocity. Why? Because we rally around (politically and socially) discounts that are obtained by use of falsehoods, pretenses, and irreciprocity. So the question is always and everywhere, why one would pursue one’s ends (power) by means of discounting using falsehood, pretense, and irreciprocity (fraud), rather than pursue them honestly and restitutionally (restitution) by violence, or honestly and predatorily (predation) by violence – other than (a) one has no chance of achieving other by coercion or violence. In other words, why pursue a failure other than to avoid action in pursuit of a success? All we ask in propertarianism is to impose reciprocity by violence as a means of restitution.