by James Santagata
4 Phases Attack / Debate Strategy by Jewish Left*
(You’ll notice Jewish right engages using fact, logic, etc. as a default, the left not)
Phase 1: Pilpul – (Hebrew for… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=288181415112089&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-29 07:20:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1034702263233794053
by James Santagata
4 Phases Attack / Debate Strategy by Jewish Left*
(You’ll notice Jewish right engages using fact, logic, etc. as a default, the left not)
Phase 1: Pilpul – (Hebrew for pepper) tiring contortions to exhaust opponent while trying to mock and create the illusion of superior intellect (and morals).
Phase 2: Bilbul – (Hebrew for confusion). If the opponent calls out and crushes the Pilpul, it moves to Bilbul which is to confuse and create havoc.
Phase 3 – Bulbul – (Hebrew for “penis” or “dick”, child taunt / usage among Israelis), if one makes it past Pilpul and Bilbul the phase moves to Bulbul, name calling and pure ad hominems.
Phase 4: BooBul: A faux-Hebrewization of English “booboo” ala “I done fucked up debating that guy!!!” + Hebrew “Bul” to create the neology and stay within and satisfy the rhyming / semi-alliterative patterns above.
Phases 1-4 are predictive and simple patterns and techniques to quickly deflect, side step or crush Pilpul, Bilbul, Bulbul, and finally Boobul.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-29 03:20:00 UTC
https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/4829981Updated Aug 29, 2018, 2:55 AM
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-29 02:55:00 UTC
Note that (a) I am defending Einstein. (b) he doesn’t understand that I am but is having a feminine reaction to criticism of one of her children, (c) claims expertise but only demonstrates the use of gossip (praise) rather than addressing any of the criticisms of Einstein (that are false). Once you realize their women, and you know how women cognate, then they are very simple. What I am most fascinated by, is the fact that when a pseudo-male uses feminine argument, we respond differently than if a females uses feminine argument. It demonstrates that we in fact do not take women seriously, and we take men who argue in the feminine (pilpul and critique) less seriously despite the fact that their WORDS INFLUENCE WOMEN MORE THAN OURS. WOMEN ARE OUR WEAKNESS.
Note that (a) I am defending Einstein. (b) he doesn’t understand that I am but is having a feminine reaction to criticism of one of her children, (c) claims expertise but only demonstrates the use of gossip (praise) rather than addressing any of the criticisms of Einstein (that are false). Once you realize their women, and you know how women cognate, then they are very simple. What I am most fascinated by, is the fact that when a pseudo-male uses feminine argument, we respond differently than if a females uses feminine argument. It demonstrates that we in fact do not take women seriously, and we take men who argue in the feminine (pilpul and critique) less seriously despite the fact that their WORDS INFLUENCE WOMEN MORE THAN OURS. WOMEN ARE OUR WEAKNESS.
Look. I know what I am doing here but do you? I try to reach people the best that I can. I use locker room talk when I can. I weave narratives across disciplines to show patterns by repetition rather than drag you through all the analytical steps. I am extremely forgiving and tolerant of everyone other than trolls and antagonists. I care deeply about people – but not about protecting your (their) ignorance, errors, wishful-thinking, and excuses. My job is to use truth as a weapon to deprive the enemy of the abrahamic and feminine deceits forever. And that means zero tolerance for comforting falsehoods. The means political and religious and moral falsehoods. There are people in this world who have some knowledge and skill, and are fairly bright. But I’m sorry to tell you that coming at me with your favorite excuse or justification is going to make me gently try to educate you. But if you get critical of me and play pilpul, critique, emoting, or trolling at some point I’m going to have to defend myself from your nonsense one way or the other. People whose arguments are obviously dim I can just block. But if the common man who follows cannot determine if you’re an empty hat or not, I’m gonna go for increasingly painful hits to stop you. So please don’t make me go there. Thanks.
Look. I know what I am doing here but do you? I try to reach people the best that I can. I use locker room talk when I can. I weave narratives across disciplines to show patterns by repetition rather than drag you through all the analytical steps. I am extremely forgiving and tolerant of everyone other than trolls and antagonists. I care deeply about people – but not about protecting your (their) ignorance, errors, wishful-thinking, and excuses. My job is to use truth as a weapon to deprive the enemy of the abrahamic and feminine deceits forever. And that means zero tolerance for comforting falsehoods. The means political and religious and moral falsehoods. There are people in this world who have some knowledge and skill, and are fairly bright. But I’m sorry to tell you that coming at me with your favorite excuse or justification is going to make me gently try to educate you. But if you get critical of me and play pilpul, critique, emoting, or trolling at some point I’m going to have to defend myself from your nonsense one way or the other. People whose arguments are obviously dim I can just block. But if the common man who follows cannot determine if you’re an empty hat or not, I’m gonna go for increasingly painful hits to stop you. So please don’t make me go there. Thanks.
—“Ted Erne Trump is a total douche bag. What does he know about being a veteran? Absolutely nothing!”—
What do you know about being president? Running a multi billion dollar business in… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=287620135168217&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-27 18:14:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1034142008246460418
—“Ted Erne Trump is a total douche bag. What does he know about being a veteran? Absolutely nothing!”—
What do you know about being president? Running a multi billion dollar business in one of the most competitive industries?
He wants to fix the veterans administration which by all accounts is as bad as socialized medicine elsewhere. No one has advocated for veterans since Reagan.
If you don’t like the guy or like his method of managing a hostile government he was voted in to dismantle, then just say so. But make an intelligent criticism.
I’ve studied this guy pretty thoroughly for a long time and he operates by very little other than the strategy of hostile negotiations, forcing others to take responsibility and blame, and figthing for his side of the fence to the death. That may not be what you want in a president. It is however, WHAT OUR ECONOMY NEEDS.
No more globalism. End the empire. Return to domestic governance. End federal tyranny over the states.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-27 14:13:00 UTC
EXAMPLE OF J-CRITIQUE
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-27 14:05:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1034079567831543809