Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • It does occur to me that there are plenty of apartments within walking distance

    It does occur to me that there are plenty of apartments within walking distance of yours….. lolz


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 17:44:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062400888931803136

    Reply addressees: @xmjEE

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062392017316179968


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062392017316179968

  • RE: PETERSON VS ZIZEK 1) PETERSON – JP is a clinical psychologist (cognitive the

    RE: PETERSON VS ZIZEK

    1) PETERSON – JP is a clinical psychologist (cognitive therapist), and he researches the impact of personality on behavior. His work is largely an attempt (knowingly or not) to restore Stoicism. He has (successfully) identified the relationship between jungian categories and literary archetypes and uses those narratives just as the priesthood has, to teach therapeutic concepts by suggestion rather than CBT’s direct exposure. (I disagree with this technique for therapy but not for teaching in the first place.) There is a worldwide demand for Stoicism because we have almost finally restored the level of civilization achieved by the late Empire before the Abrahamic Dark Age.

    So to flip it around, what is Aizek but a someone who has stolen and parroted others ideas and then practice Critique (Gossip)?

    2) MARX, COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, GLOBALISM – We don’t need to debunk marx, that’s been done for decades. Marx created a fairy story. (a) Man was not oppressed, but incrementally domesticated by his betters, like every other domesticated animal. Societies advanced best and fastest who most culled the underclasses (European Bipartite Manorialism, and East Asian Rice Farming) and culling the underclass is the cheapest, fastest, most secure means of improving the standard of life of the citizenry. (b) labor has little or no value since it is the organization of production that creates the value, and labor is a fungible low value cost easily and continuously replaced by machines, computers, and now artificial intelligences. (c) the underclass cannot organize production, or govern, or lead because they lack the ABILITIES to do so (dunning kruger, distribution of intelligence). (d) all non-market social orders maximize rent seeking at the expense of the laboring, working, middle, and professional classes, while all market orders suppress rent seeking through competition. (e) the problem we face is immigration of the underclasses, downward redistribution of reproduction to the lower and underclasses, subsidies that encourage this process, and the continuous destruction of the middle class majority produced by centuries of manorialism (hanging, disease, and wars), culling those underclasses, (f) the political problem we face is financialization of the economy in addition to bureaucratic rents, (both of which are fixable by market means. (g) Marx-Boas-Freud-Cantor-Adorno(et al) proposed an underclass monopoly, while Mises, Friedman, Rand, Rothbard, a Middle Class, while Foucault, Derrida, Rorty a Priestly-Feminine Upper Middle, while Friedan, Firestone, Dworkin a Feminist, and Strauss-Neocons a Political/Military upper class monopoly. The left proposes MONOPOLIES (a herd) and the right proposes MARKETS (packs).

    3) FASCISM, NAZIISM, NATIONALISM – Naziism like all Fascism was providing an alternative to (Bolshevik) World Communism. It was the most successful implementation of the original French Proposition. Peterson knows this just as any scholar knows this.

    We are still fighting this warfare of Nationalism (A Market of Polities) and Globalism ( Monopoly Polity). and we have just complete a century of that test.

    (a) Each attempt by the globalists has failed, and (b) each attempt by the nationalists has eventually succeeded. We are currently in the last phase, under which we will restore nationalism worldwide and return to state-capitalism (fasicsm) most of which will be ethnocentric, and some which will not – and will devolve in to indian, muslim, african, and south american poverty.

    Rousseau (Feminine Subjective) + Schopenhauer, Hegel et al (Conflationists) + Kant (Masculine Analytic)

    -vs-

    Marx, Cantor, Freud, Adorno (Working and Underclasses) – FAILED

    -vs-

    Mises, Friedman, Rand, Rothbard, (Middle Classes) – FAILED

    -vs-

    Foucault, Derrida, Rorty (Priestly-Feminine Upper Middle) – FAILING RIGHT NOW

    -vs-

    Friedan, Firestone, Dworkin (Feminists) – FAILING RIGHT NOW

    -vs-

    Strauss-Neocons (Political/Military-Masculine – Upper) FAILED

    The gradual attack on Aristocratic Civilization from the bottom up.

    -The Counter-Revolution Against Anglo Legal-Empiricism, and German Rational-Science-

    Utopian Promise upon Achieving Monopoly Consensus + Straw Man + Pilpul and Critique:


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 17:19:00 UTC

  • Thanks

    Thanks.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 16:58:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062389248505057281

    Reply addressees: @MetrolinxWatch

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062387790858633216


    IN REPLY TO:

    @MetrolinxWatch

    @curtdoolittle I can yes.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062387790858633216

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46165548_10156776004742264_749091785

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46165548_10156776004742264_7490917851830681600_n_10156776004737264.jpg Necessary New StampAurick Faustwhat about counter signal memes for fashy goys?Nov 13, 2018, 4:47 PMNoah J RevoyNo counter signaling the truth, or we hang you.Nov 13, 2018, 4:57 PMKari Anne DorstadFollowing as i’m clueless to what this is about ?Nov 13, 2018, 5:21 PMChris CantrellI’m with Kari. Are you talking about signaling/counter signaling in regards to any strength or weakness? Is counter signaling, or just a lack of signaling, not preferable to signaling?Nov 13, 2018, 5:31 PMAlex MacleodGrug read old carvings, Grug grok new carvings, Grug not ask more, leader of bigbrain tribe happy as more time for teach bigbrains village-cleverness.Nov 13, 2018, 6:02 PMCurt DoolittleCOUNTER SIGNALING AS A COVER FOR COWARDICENov 14, 2018, 10:22 AMCurt DoolittleIt’s the opposite of VIRTUE SIGNALING as a cover for COST AVOIDANCENov 14, 2018, 10:22 AMCurt DoolittleLESSON: Virtue Signalling vs Counter-Signalling

    VIRTUE SIGNALING <- Description –> COUNTER-SIGNALING

    (about what I say)…………………………….(about what you say)Nov 14, 2018, 10:23 AMNecessary New Stamp


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 16:45:00 UTC

  • (ie. Yes. 😉 )

    (ie. Yes. 😉 )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 13:56:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062343357194792960

    Reply addressees: @StirlingFinn @TrueDilTom

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062272797139861504


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062272797139861504

  • He has interviewed me before. I’d be happy to talk to him again. Sure

    He has interviewed me before. I’d be happy to talk to him again. Sure.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 13:55:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062343212881379328

    Reply addressees: @vonjagerbombr @JFGariepy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062332785543839744


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062332785543839744

  • False Promise upon Consensus + Straw Man + Pilpul and Critique: Marx, Cantor, Fr

    False Promise upon Consensus + Straw Man + Pilpul and Critique: Marx, Cantor, Freud, Adorno (Working) -vs- Mises, Rand, Rothbard (Middle) -vs- Strauss-Neocons (Political/Military-Masculine) -vs- Foucault, Derrida, Rorty (Priestly-Feminine) -vs- (insert feminist authors here)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 12:45:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062325655780708352

    Reply addressees: @StirlingFinn @TrueDilTom

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062272797139861504


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062272797139861504

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46199447_10156775450972264_806925106

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46199447_10156775450972264_8069251063846273024_n_10156775450967264.jpg Guilty.Micah PezdirtzIs that supposed to be a bad thing?Nov 13, 2018, 12:10 PMDuje DanteCurt what do u think of this manNov 13, 2018, 12:12 PMNoah J RevoyThe most intolerant win.Nov 13, 2018, 12:23 PMZak DouglasendorsementNov 13, 2018, 12:28 PMVincent AnthonyIntellegence almost necessitates the agrivation of others. Small minds don’t like hearing uncormfortable truths.Nov 13, 2018, 12:51 PMAngus JamesonDescribes my aspirations. What a great compliment.Nov 13, 2018, 12:52 PMAngus JamesonMe: I never suffer fools and I don’t cast pearls before swine. Honest questions or debate, or you are dismissed with prejudice.Nov 13, 2018, 12:54 PMRussell WagnerIndeed, why not?Nov 13, 2018, 12:54 PMKevin CoxI find it amusing that this fellow apparently believes these two traits are not interrelated.Nov 13, 2018, 12:55 PMChristopher M MatthewsIntolerance is a necessary virtue.Nov 13, 2018, 12:59 PMC.G. DanielsI’m not seeing the negative here.Nov 13, 2018, 1:07 PMKelly JohnsonCharlie Delta me eitherNov 13, 2018, 1:08 PMAngus JamesonKevin Cox Indeed. High smarts along with continual learning and self-correction of errors leads to being an intolerant prick because of the utter mass of ignorance, stupidity, and #NPC regurgitation of catechisms all around you.

    Being an intolerant prick first, not smart and self correcting first, leads to Dunning-Kruger and solipsist ersatz “smarts.”Nov 13, 2018, 1:09 PMJoe Redtree”but”? why not “and”?Nov 13, 2018, 1:20 PMAndrea Royall<<< insufferable twat.. can confirm 🙂Nov 13, 2018, 1:34 PMAmy ComptonAndrea, I love your pixie cut. Cute!Nov 13, 2018, 1:41 PMJon JonathanNov 13, 2018, 1:44 PMJames Dmitro MakienkoThe actual scientific definition of tolerance is the decrease of resistance of a system or organism to outside hostile objects/virii/bacteria/chemicals/forces/((()))s

    So staying INtolerant means having increased resistance to harmful things which increases chances of survival. Which is evolutionary speaking a positive thing.Nov 13, 2018, 5:22 PMCurt DoolittleI don’t kow much about romanian interwar activists.Nov 13, 2018, 5:23 PMAyham NedalWhere exactly did he say that lolNov 13, 2018, 5:24 PMIgor RogovNot really. I attacked Curt in a ways that would get me banned and reported by any left-wing precocious nitwit within minutes, but Curt tolerated my lack of reverence with remarkably good humour.Nov 13, 2018, 8:24 PMBenny BurkeSincere question Curt, have you ever lost a fist fight?Nov 13, 2018, 8:36 PMJennifer DeanBetter than a limp prick.Nov 13, 2018, 8:59 PMJustin OdiognAyham, he didn’t say it.

    D James Kennedy did.Nov 14, 2018, 7:05 AMGuilty.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 12:05:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46199447_10156775450972264_806925106

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/46199447_10156775450972264_8069251063846273024_n_10156775450967264.jpg Guilty.Micah PezdirtzIs that supposed to be a bad thing?Nov 13, 2018, 12:10 PMDuje DanteCurt what do u think of this manNov 13, 2018, 12:12 PMNoah J RevoyThe most intolerant win.Nov 13, 2018, 12:23 PMZak DouglasendorsementNov 13, 2018, 12:28 PMKevin WuAn intolerant but entirely tolerable prick*Nov 13, 2018, 12:38 PMVincent AnthonyIntellegence almost necessitates the agrivation of others. Small minds don’t like hearing uncormfortable truths.Nov 13, 2018, 12:51 PMAngus JamesonDescribes my aspirations. What a great compliment.Nov 13, 2018, 12:52 PMAngus JamesonMe: I never suffer fools and I don’t cast pearls before swine. Honest questions or debate, or you are dismissed with prejudice.Nov 13, 2018, 12:54 PMRussell WagnerIndeed, why not?Nov 13, 2018, 12:54 PMKevin CoxI find it amusing that this fellow apparently believes these two traits are not interrelated.Nov 13, 2018, 12:55 PMChristopher M MatthewsIntolerance is a necessary virtue.Nov 13, 2018, 12:59 PMCharlie DeltaI’m not seeing the negative here.Nov 13, 2018, 1:07 PMKelly JohnsonCharlie Delta me eitherNov 13, 2018, 1:08 PMAngus JamesonKevin Cox Indeed. High smarts along with continual learning and self-correction of errors leads to being an intolerant prick because of the utter mass of ignorance, stupidity, and #NPC regurgitation of catechisms all around you.

    Being an intolerant prick first, not smart and self correcting first, leads to Dunning-Kruger and solipsist ersatz “smarts.”Nov 13, 2018, 1:09 PMJoe Redtree”but”? why not “and”?Nov 13, 2018, 1:20 PMAndrea Royall<<< insufferable twat.. can confirm 🙂Nov 13, 2018, 1:34 PMAmy ComptonAndrea, I love your pixie cut. Cute!Nov 13, 2018, 1:41 PMJon JonathanNov 13, 2018, 1:44 PMJames Dmitro MakienkoThe actual scientific definition of tolerance is the decrease of resistance of a system or organism to outside hostile objects/virii/bacteria/chemicals/forces/((()))s

    So staying INtolerant means having increased resistance to harmful things which increases chances of survival. Which is evolutionary speaking a positive thing.Nov 13, 2018, 5:22 PMCurt DoolittleI don’t kow much about romanian interwar activists.Nov 13, 2018, 5:23 PMAyham NedalWhere exactly did he say that lolNov 13, 2018, 5:24 PMIgor RogovNot really. I attacked Curt in a ways that would get me banned and reported by any left-wing precocious nitwit within minutes, but Curt tolerated my lack of reverence with remarkably good humour.Nov 13, 2018, 8:24 PMBenny BurkeSincere question Curt, have you ever lost a fist fight?Nov 13, 2018, 8:36 PMJennifer DeanBetter than a limp prick.Nov 13, 2018, 8:59 PMJustin OdiognAyham, he didn’t say it.

    D James Kennedy did.Nov 14, 2018, 7:05 AMGuilty.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 12:05:00 UTC

  • NO, I’M HONESTLY CALLY POMO’S CRIMINALS. As for dishonest, no, I am HONESTLY (Tr

    NO, I’M HONESTLY CALLY POMO’S CRIMINALS.

    As for dishonest, no, I am HONESTLY (Truthfully also) claiming GA like POMO is a pseudoscientific fraud for the purpose of restoring a secular cult of abrahamic equalitarianism by the same incremental techniques that were used in the ancient world to undermine the aristocracy, by the same process of selling to women in particular and the useful idiots that pursue the favor of those women, to bring about our conquest yet again by immigration and displacement. And no, there is no value in trying to recreate the levantine culture here in the west, It’s been failing for thousands of years. The chinese and the europeans had it right. BUILD WALLS.

    WOrse, I am claiming that the only incentive to pursue a pseudoscientific fraud is to use cunning as a weapon of coercion against those lacking sufficient agency to comprehend the consequences of the actions thus inspired.

    So I am honestly calling such people not just fools, but frauds, and in very real terms – criminals, in a crime against humanity.

    Is that over the top enough? ;)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-13 11:21:00 UTC