Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • Well done. (And yes this type of clarity is why I’m a little adamant that you st

    Well done.
    (And yes this type of clarity is why I’m a little adamant that you stick around and ‘serve the common good’ despite that social media is flooded with vocal overconfident wishful thinking dark triads, the vapidly ignorant, and mouth breathers. πŸ˜‰ )
    Hugs


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-07 04:23:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787699761790791968

    Reply addressees: @MindEnjoyer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787699167579541675

  • That’s nonsense. The data is available online

    That’s nonsense. The data is available online.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-07 04:21:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787699205626020217

    Reply addressees: @NgorkiirNgor @AlternatNews

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787515297101950996

  • He did. But he added the commentary and Walter is one of the best people underst

    He did. But he added the commentary and Walter is one of the best people understanding and applying my work.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-07 04:14:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787697405267190137

    Reply addressees: @gozlozha_udasha @WalterIII

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787694169802080459

  • RT @MatthewParrott: One of the key features of White Enclavism, one blissfully i

    RT @MatthewParrott: One of the key features of White Enclavism, one blissfully ignored by Kauffman, is that the enclaves would be self-sort…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-06 23:49:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787630773169766655

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @Griffit15999943 @spaceangelvoice –“Incentives are everythin

    RT @curtdoolittle: @Griffit15999943 @spaceangelvoice –“Incentives are everything in our species. Why can’t politicians understand this? “…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-06 23:44:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787629487221297486

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @Griffit15999943 @KirkegaardEmil @Shiftant PUBLIC DEMORALIZAT

    RT @curtdoolittle: @Griffit15999943 @KirkegaardEmil @Shiftant PUBLIC DEMORALIZATION IN SCIENCE, ACADEMY, PUBLIC DISCOURSE, MEDIA, AND THE G…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-06 23:39:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787628372438200399

  • EOWK: It may have been bad science but that doesn’t mean its false either. In fa

    EOWK:
    It may have been bad science but that doesn’t mean its false either. In fact, just working from the neuroscience alone would suggest no other outcome. So taking a position against the quality of the work does not falsify the theory. That’s as equally unscientific. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-06 21:00:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787588306013741249

    Reply addressees: @KirkegaardEmil @Shiftant

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787280000204386577

  • And a high school audience. “Title: Individual Success Comes from Working Togeth

    And a high school audience.

    “Title: Individual Success Comes from Working Together as a Society, Made Possible by Heroes Working for the Common Good

    The author is making a few key points:

    While focusing on individual success is practical and leads to the best results for individuals, the economy, and politics, no one succeeds completely alone. All human achievements depend on being part of a society that provides resources and has rules.

    The author disagrees with Isaac Asimov’s “Three Laws of Robotics” (rules for how robots should behave). The author thinks these rules only work if society creates the right conditions for them.

    How far into the future people think (called “time preference”) when making decisions depends on how well society provides shared resources. This affects things like preserving genetic traits, physical appearance, civilization, and culture over time.

    Although it might seem like this view goes against wanting a country for a specific ethnic group (an “ethnostate”), the author argues that it actually supports this idea. Having the power to get people to be patient and think long-term leads to the best shared resources for the past, present, and future.

    For the author, “Whiteness” means individuals being responsible for things that benefit both themselves and society. It means respecting ancestors, investing in shared resources now, and passing on resources to future generations. This allows continuous improvement through a culture of pursuing truth, excellence, beauty, cooperation, and heroically overcoming challenges.

    The author believes understanding these points provides a scientific and inspiring worldview. It can be the basis for laws and a natural religion to preserve European people, their connection to their ancestors, and nature.”

    Reply addressees: @radiofreenw


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-06 20:46:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787584756294512642

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787578815318729162

  • Now for a postgrad audience: “Title: Individual-ism is a Product of Commons-ism,

    Now for a postgrad audience:

    “Title: Individual-ism is a Product of Commons-ism, Which is a Product of Hero-ism for the Common Good

    The author posits that while the pursuit of individual maximization of potential is pragmatic and optimal in various domains (individual, economic, and political), it is inherently contingent upon the individual’s participation in and regulation by the commons produced by a polity.

    The author critiques Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics as a sophistic metaphysical presumption, arguing that their viability is predicated on the existence of a polity that generates and necessitates them as a commons.

    Furthermore, the author asserts that the time preference of an individual’s decision-making criteria, exemplified by the choice of the limit of genetic persistence of group genome, morphology, phenotype, civilization, and culture, is also a product of the polity’s capacity to produce commons sufficient to extend both individual and group time preferences to that limit.

    While this may appear to contradict the ambitions of preserving an ethnostate, the author argues that it actually vindicates it. The pursuit of power to institutionalize the delay of gratification by extending time preference in the production of the optimum discovered and known commons for past, present, and future is justified.

    The author defines “Whiteness” as the institutional demand for individual responsibility across the spectrum of private to common for shared producers of that commons, and responsibility for the past debt to ancestors, present cost of commons for one another, and transfer of that inheritance and cost as an investment for future generations. This produces continuous evolution in duty to truth, excellence, beauty, and the institution of discounts on complex cooperation, stress, uncertainty, and a mindfulness and culture of heroism in their production.

    The author concludes by asserting that understanding these concepts provides a scientific, profound, and inspirational foundation for a natural religion of European people, their ancestors, and nature, as well as the criteria for the foundations of law to ensure the persistence of their people.”

    Reply addressees: @radiofreenw


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-06 20:44:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787584151589097472

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787578815318729162

  • “Here’s a translation of the article that a first-year college student should be

    “Here’s a translation of the article that a first-year college student should be able to understand:

    Title: Individual success comes from working together as a society, which is made possible by people being heroes for the common good

    The author is making a few main points:

    While focusing on individual success is practical and leads to the best outcomes for individuals, the economy, and politics, no one succeeds entirely on their own. All human achievements depend on being part of a society that provides resources and has rules.

    The author qualifies Isaac Asimov’s “Three Laws of Robotics” (rules for how robots should behave). The author thinks these rules only work if society creates the conditions for them.

    How long-term people think (called “time preference”) when making decisions depends on how well society provides shared resources. This affects things like preserving genetic traits, physical traits, civilization, and culture over time.

    Although it may seem like this view goes against wanting an ethnostate (a state or country for a particular ethnic group), the author argues the opposite is true. Having the power to get people to be patient and think long-term leads to the best shared resources for the past, present and future.

    For the author, “Whiteness” means individuals being responsible for things that benefit themselves and society as a whole. It means paying debts to ancestors, investing in shared resources in the present, and passing on resources to future generations. This allows continuous improvement through a culture of pursuing truth, excellence, beauty, cooperation, and heroically overcoming challenges.

    The author believes understanding these points provides a scientific and inspiring worldview. It can be the basis for laws and a natural religion to preserve European people and their connection to their ancestors and nature.”

    Reply addressees: @radiofreenw


    Source date (UTC): 2024-05-06 20:41:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787583528592429057

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1787578815318729162