Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • Usual nonsense from Claire “I don’t get it so it must be bad, and only Monotheis

    Usual nonsense from Claire “I don’t get it so it must be bad, and only Monotheistic Authoritarian, Christian if necessary, muslim if possible can provide a means of rule.” Answered in the comments and on FB. (Not that it is worth our time.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-18 16:48:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075070232258056192

    Reply addressees: @Theocracy4all

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075059589585010689


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075059589585010689

  • REGARDING CLAIRE KHAW’S CRITIQUE OF JOHN MARK by The Propertarian Institute Let’

    REGARDING CLAIRE KHAW’S CRITIQUE OF JOHN MARK

    by The Propertarian Institute

    Let’s understand Claire’s critique: Claire is a die-hard advocate for monotheistic religious, Christian if necessary, and Muslim if possible, Authoritarianism. Her argument is reducible to “I can’t understand it so it’s not good”, and here motive is “I can understand authoritarian religion so it is good.”

    That’s all she has to say – really. The rest is just (((critique))): meaning criticism of straw men, rather than proposal of a possible educational, social, economic, legal, and political order that can compete with the alternatives.

    Critique is always employed as a deceit. It’s just been Industrialized during the (((late 19th and entire 20th))) centuries due to the hostile attack on western civilization in the modern world using sophism, utopianism, and pseudoscience like judaism, christianity, and islam used sophism and supernaturalism to create a hostile attack on the great civilizations of the ancient world, through the natural vulnerability of women to such ideas, and the natural demand by the underclass of such ideas – despite those ideas being in conflict with anything other than dysgenia and decline. -Cheers

    Fool us once, shame one (((abrahamists))) of all religions. Fool us twice, shame on us for letting them.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-18 11:35:00 UTC

  • (Great feed. -cheers)

    (Great feed. -cheers)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-18 08:37:00 UTC

  • what part of I AM JUST GETTING IT UP THERE do you not undrestand… lol

    what part of I AM JUST GETTING IT UP THERE do you not undrestand… lol


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-17 18:13:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1074729198785302530

    Reply addressees: @xmjEE

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1074728061793390593


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1074728061793390593

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/48392507_10156853251257264_346067349

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/48392507_10156853251257264_3460673497934594048_o_10156853251252264.jpg CAN WE HAVE A CELEBRATION OVER THE SHUTTERING OF (((THE WEEKLY STANDARD))) AND IT’S NEOCON DREAMS?Thomas L. WattDec 17, 2018, 6:36 PMMichael ChurchillBill Kristol is clearly one of the most evil men of the last 50 years.Dec 17, 2018, 7:08 PMMike WilliamsThe weak’knee’d standardDec 17, 2018, 8:25 PMJim LeisWho bank rolled him and that rag for so many years? Surely shite like that is not sustained by membership alone.Dec 17, 2018, 10:01 PMCAN WE HAVE A CELEBRATION OVER THE SHUTTERING OF (((THE WEEKLY STANDARD))) AND IT’S NEOCON DREAMS?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-17 18:06:00 UTC

  • ( Thanks. Only took about four years of pretty hard work to get here… lol ) -h

    ( Thanks. Only took about four years of pretty hard work to get here… lol ) -hugs


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-17 13:01:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1074650706290843648

    Reply addressees: @PoseidonAwoke

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1074485430014361600


    IN REPLY TO:

    @PoseidonAwoke

    @curtdoolittle This is excellent. You’ve got it. This is workable. https://t.co/yauQp6HkLC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1074485430014361600

  • VS TALEB There isn’t any difference between taleb and I other than he prefers li

    VS TALEB

    There isn’t any difference between taleb and I other than he prefers literary philosophy, literature, reason, and math. He’s exhausted the math direction. He’s pretty much exhausted the literary direction, and he is very close to understanding that there is no positivist solution, and that only the law (warranty of due diligence) – which he calls skin in the game – is a possible method of testing whether individuals have sufficient agency AND honesty AND ethics to make choices.

    Otherwise I don’t know why we’re incompatible.

    Jeppeson hasn’t had an idea other than to retread derrida by adding in chomsky, and trying to create ‘social construction’ of authoritarianism (a religion of male authoritarian postmodernism) to compete with the left’s religion of feminine authoritarianism.)

    (I just deal with science, economics, law, education, and now that form of education we call religion.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-16 11:54:00 UTC

  • THE DESIRES OF ABSOLUTISTS by Bill Joslin I don’t think the absolutists are hate

    THE DESIRES OF ABSOLUTISTS

    by Bill Joslin

    I don’t think the absolutists are haters. I think they lack what they claim we lack – that being a foundation for meaning,. motivation -“a superordinate transcendental ideal to be subservient to”…

    We have that – it’s called Career, Friends, Family and Kids.

    They’re looking for meaning and inspiration.

    They’re unestablished males seeking to individuate from “dad”.

    The critiques leveled at us as best as I can see are a series of straw men and equivocations , but suspect their main recruitment efforts which are successful are build off critique of propertarianism (much like our strongest arguments are leveled against libertarians) – without prop – there would not really be much for absolutist to build their case on without going whole hog pomo.

    Besides it’s a strange conflation of de Jouvenel On Power used to justify “charisma” (he who drives the idiom is king) as a “metaphysically” coherent justification for absolute rule (the idiomatic subterrain king) (which if you really thought about it – what drives idiomatic mimicking in society (fashion, fame etc) is often driven from the underclasses up (pop music, pop culture, thug culture etc)…

    At least we understand why this is: omegas service as stress relief for the group – deferred aggression and initiation of play.

    Why? Because that’s all they have to offer.

    They’re not haters per say, just building a castle in the clouds and looking for others to agree it’s made of stone.

    Now, I shouldn’t have said they “lack” what they claim we are lacking, but rather have said they are looking for (trying to construct) what they see we are missing.

    But it kind of baffles me… For instance; aesthetics and transcendentals being required for motivation… Joel once said to me that having an aesthetic is propelling these young men toward excellence – working out, self perfection, career etc…. Yet under in the sheepdog group the things which Ivar is doing with is family business, of Alain is doing personally, or Bryan is doing locally… There are many of us driven forward by understanding the operational necessity of agency-en-toto .

    It’s a simple if-then operation. If agency is at the root of this then I should build agency, if I value (xyz) then I should act (agency) …

    This doesn’t diminish or reduce motivation to some materialistic or positivist frame (Anglo ontology as they would say) but rather demonstrates that aesthetics grounds into something more fundamental.

    The result is a market for aesthetics – each moving in the same direction (increase agency) for their own personal reasons opposed to a grand unifying aesthetic.

    Just seems like they’re seeking another monopoly – or rather seeking someone who has a monopoly on aesthetics and/or a monopoly on inspiration ( a leader )

    You know…. “Anglo ontology can’t provide a transcendental” – yet I see that it is. It’s just not always a shiny, polished, sophisticated ideal… It can be mundane – like love of your family, or pride in work well done – it can be simple. And that is where I see their dissatisfaction – what we propose isn’t “special” enough. And that specialness they seek I think is the outward manifestation of young males seeking to establish themself via status symbols (specialness) at reduced costs (ideals over reals).

    I have a great respect for and see them walking the same path I did 20 years ago… That path leads here not over there.

    Give them time, let them live, forebearence for what ever costs they’ll impose in the meantime… They’ll eventually meet us somewhere in the middle – all young men must individuate on their own terms (or it wouldn’t be an individuation process).

    They’re my brothers too…. If anything it’s taught me what that patient yet irritated look on my father’s face meant, when I railed away at some stupidity in my youth.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-16 05:48:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://youtu.be/Vbl5cCWOnt8

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-15 22:16:00 UTC

  • “….you don’t seem to understand metaphysics. Deep myth and the unconscious are

    —“….you don’t seem to understand metaphysics. Deep myth and the unconscious are on a completely different tangent to most of what your work is about,…”— ]

    It’s ok. But I think I understand just fine thanks.

    Addiction responses to pleasure sources, particularly escapist pleasure sources are indifferent between humans. That which tastes, touches, sounds, appears, intuits to be preferable, good, useful, even wonderful, has little or no correlation to what is, especially cumulatively, good. It is not like our evolution has kept pace with our experiential innovation.

    REST VS ESCAPE

    Our neural economy is expensive. Managing our neural, emotional, and physical budgets is work. Hence why we – most of us – seek means of finding safety in or near, the pack or herd. Worse, those of us who spend greater effort suppression our impulses, and those who expend greater effort while resulting in continuous failure or at least stagnation, seek those comforts mentally, emotionally, physically, and economically and politically.

    The civil society gives us rest.

    The undiscovered valley (nature) gives us some escape and rest.

    The alternatives give us not rest but escape.

    And some alternatives give us no rest, but escape at the cost of harm to ourselves.

    And some at the cost to ourselves and others.

    ESCAPE TO IMAGINARY WORLDS

    While it is true that many we can forecast many world, and assist each other in the forecasting of many worlds, and that, from these many worlds we can obtain ideation, and we can obtain the psychic rewards from investment in those many worlds, and that we can interpret the present in the context of those many worlds, the fact remains that we can do so with every possible grammar available to us. We can do so by planning a future. we can do so by daydreaming. We can so by conversing with others. By all sorts of play and entertainment. We can do so by reading. We can do this by ritual inducing. We can do it by social inducing – particularly in large groups. We can do so by drug inducing.

    THE PROBLEM IS NOT THE GOOD – BUT THE BAD

    The question is not how we produce these alternate worlds and obtain the results – looking only at the good of the phenomenon. But how can we prevent the production, and distribution, of those fantasies in those imaginary worlds that affect the present and future.

    The evidence is what it is. And Study of comparative means of obtaining mindfulness simply results in the understanding that religion as we understand it – not as it was originally founded, or not as we can undrestand it today – is one of the worst things to every happen to mankind – in fact, judaism, islam, and christianity are second only to the great plagues. And even that it requires us to compare with our ancient enemy malaria to compete with those three religions.

    There have been at least three dark ages. THe stone age, the bronze age, the iron age. And it looks very much like we have spent a century falling into the dark age of the steel age.

    FOOLED US ONCE. FOOLING US TWICE.

    We are at a precipice for our people and our religion is part of the problem, and our church has abandoned us to the third world, and our governments have done exactly as did the byzantines and romans.

    They are dragging us into the only hell there is: genetic death.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-15 16:45:00 UTC