Curt Doolittle

Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • 8) However, this has nothing to do with and is merely an EXCUSE for Gans’ writin

    8) However, this has nothing to do with and is merely an EXCUSE for Gans’ writing and the scope of the GA writing available, and the GA Blog for example, consists of little more than the ‘astrology and numerology of speech’ and simply a revision of the sophism of abrahamic and ..

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-21 12:18:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1076089436390215680

    Reply addressees: @TrueDilTom @justecar @Imperius__13 @JohnMarkSays @torinmccabe @DataDistribute @MahmoudZaini @Dick71224996

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075890809357123592

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TrueDilTom @justecar @Imperius__13 @JohnMarkSays @torinmccabe @DataDistribute @MahmoudZaini @Dick71224996 It’s bad enough we have left wing liars taking advantage of women and the underclass, but it’s hard to understand why there are those of you who want to take advantage of lost, underachieving young man and throw them in the degenerative maelstrom with the women and fools.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1075890809357123592

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @TrueDilTom @justecar @Imperius__13 @JohnMarkSays @torinmccabe @DataDistribute @MahmoudZaini @Dick71224996 It’s bad enough we have left wing liars taking advantage of women and the underclass, but it’s hard to understand why there are those of you who want to take advantage of lost, underachieving young man and throw them in the degenerative maelstrom with the women and fools.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1075890809357123592

  • Why Josh and Tom have trouble understanding this rather obvious dichotomy betwee

    Why Josh and Tom have trouble understanding this rather obvious dichotomy between truth/error/lies is INCENTIVE, is evidence of their justification of desirable, convenient, or utilitarian lying. End Abrahamic Supernaturalism, Sophism and Pseudoscience forever: NO MORE LIES.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-21 11:49:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1076082296766251013

    Reply addressees: @TrueDilTom @justecar @Imperius__13 @JohnMarkSays @torinmccabe @DataDistribute @MahmoudZaini @Dick71224996

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075890809357123592

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @TrueDilTom @justecar @Imperius__13 @JohnMarkSays @torinmccabe @DataDistribute @MahmoudZaini @Dick71224996 It’s bad enough we have left wing liars taking advantage of women and the underclass, but it’s hard to understand why there are those of you who want to take advantage of lost, underachieving young man and throw them in the degenerative maelstrom with the women and fools.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1075890809357123592

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @TrueDilTom @justecar @Imperius__13 @JohnMarkSays @torinmccabe @DataDistribute @MahmoudZaini @Dick71224996 It’s bad enough we have left wing liars taking advantage of women and the underclass, but it’s hard to understand why there are those of you who want to take advantage of lost, underachieving young man and throw them in the degenerative maelstrom with the women and fools.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1075890809357123592

  • “GETTING IT- IT’S MOSTLY THE GRAMMARS” by A Friend. Hey! I thought about what ma

    “GETTING IT- IT’S MOSTLY THE GRAMMARS”

    by A Friend.

    Hey! I thought about what made it ‘click’ for me.

    Here’s the result:

    “Let me try to identify things that would have made it faster:

    1) Vocabulary. That would have been the biggest barrier to entry for me. What is fictionalism? What is operationalism? Largely graspable. Once this is clear I don’t see anything blocking the understand of the grammars.

    2) I should have focused less on your facebook posts (until I got the grammars). I think I should have went straight to the website and find the Core of propertarianism. I avoided the core too much. I’m high on openness so the posts are pretty cool because there is so much to unpack and to learn from, and I could just dive inside. It’s nice to have something to grapple my mind with that can last longer that a few weeks.

    3) Writing about it and isolating the core earlier (I think going to the overview that Eli Harman put out helped). So I started to say “I need to identify the Core and write about the definitions of the concepts in the core to really appropriate them as my own”. To do that I isolated mainly testimonialism and the tests of consistency.

    4) I saw a post on the website about natural law and stating basically how you should talk and the vocabulary to use. That subject was didn’t take me very long by comparison.

    To summarize, it would have been way faster for me to say:

    *Here are the key concepts (fictionalism, operationalism, testimonialism, the tests of consistency). Here are the definitions of this terms. Here is what you can do with it. Here is how you can do it (the grammars).

    Go in the world and use it.*

    I couldn’t understand it when you said, “it is taking so long to look through everything again”. Now, I’m like “Ooooooh shit. Okay. I get it. I get how big this project is if you need to look at everything. Damn. Good job man.”

    Now I also understand that you use this Grammar and Vocabulary, and then you test what results they produce on facebook. You experiment with them on facebook.

    BIG LESSON

    ***I think if I would have understand how important are the grammars, I would have gone straight for it until I got it. Then it is a matter of investing the time to apply it.***”

    (CD: edited for clarity)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-21 10:58:00 UTC

  • saturday at -7gmt. its fine. 😉

    saturday at -7gmt. its fine. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-21 02:21:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075939242751262725

    Reply addressees: @Aurini

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075937721196007424

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075937721196007424

  • Why would i want to discourse with you?

    Why would i want to discourse with you?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-21 02:19:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075938815628533760

    Reply addressees: @DanielCollins85 @MimiVonPeach @GordonGarvey @WorMartiN @b13daly @wilkodalco @OsgurOCiardha @BoalsGoals @deanvannguyen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075866527231025153

    IN REPLY TO:

    @DanielCollins85

    @curtdoolittle @MimiVonPeach @GordonGarvey @WorMartiN @b13daly @wilkodalco @OsgurOCiardha @BoalsGoals @deanvannguyen What’s “western group evolutionary strategy”? I assume you adhere to similar immigrant-hostile ideology as expressed by @WorMartiN? Does that mean you oppose migration of groups/people to other parts of world where you feel they don’t belong due to perceived cultural differences?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075866527231025153

  • sure. 😉 it’s my job. 😉

    sure. 😉
    it’s my job. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-21 02:11:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075936771731582976

    Reply addressees: @Aurini

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075929704383705088

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075929704383705088

  • “In as much the aristocrat is improved through leisure, the prole is impoverishe

    —“In as much the aristocrat is improved through leisure, the prole is impoverished.”—Connor Whittle

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-21 01:58:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075933446739030016

  • Um. What science? There isn’t any science behind GA. It’s just Gans, who is a ca

    Um. What science? There isn’t any science behind GA. It’s just Gans, who is a career postmodernist, doing exactly what I said he is. THERE ISN’T ANY SCIENCE. The structure of language is determined by analogies to experience (the homunculus) and the recursive depth of memory.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-20 23:03:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075889497001377795

    Reply addressees: @TrueDilTom @justecar @Imperius__13 @JohnMarkSays @torinmccabe @DataDistribute @MahmoudZaini @Dick71224996

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075884973331116032

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075884973331116032

  • There is nothing to understand. GA is just postmodern Social Construction of Rea

    There is nothing to understand. GA is just postmodern Social Construction of Reality with Chomsky added to convert a sophism into a pseudoscience. Josh has intellectual penis envy, which is why he pisses on others and pursues nonsense rather than producing intellectual works.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-20 21:15:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075862308260335622

    Reply addressees: @justecar @Imperius__13 @JohnMarkSays @torinmccabe @DataDistribute @MahmoudZaini @TrueDilTom @Dick71224996

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075861461975601153

    IN REPLY TO:

    @justecar

    @Imperius__13 @JohnMarkSays @torinmccabe @DataDistribute @MahmoudZaini @TrueDilTom @Dick71224996 @curtdoolittle Your implication is people don’t understand GA – well I haven’t seen a concise explanation of it and how it offers a practical solution to the current situation.

    I’m new to both these sets of ideas so no dog in this fight, but you get very personal/insulting on this topic…

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075861461975601153

  • John. Tilting and idiot-windmills is not as valuable as educating those who desi

    John. Tilting and idiot-windmills is not as valuable as educating those who desire it. You have more influence than anyone else already and it’s not worth debating with the children.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-20 21:00:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075858413110943746

    Reply addressees: @JohnMarkSays @Imperius__13 @torinmccabe @DataDistribute @MahmoudZaini @TrueDilTom @Dick71224996

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075844452743299072

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1075844452743299072