https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hl2p3LW2i2I&t=2031shttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIGlVALFPYRROlXk511Cfhw
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-10 23:54:00 UTC
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
“Curt, don’t you think we should remove Taleb from the recommended people list?”
–“Curt, don’t you think we should remove Taleb from the recommended people list?”– Ahmed Reda
Um. we must forgive our friends for their occasional idiocy. Otherwise we will have no friends….
😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-10 18:51:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083436148339494915
-
Sorry. It is nearly impossible for me to tell the difference between humor and a
Sorry. It is nearly impossible for me to tell the difference between humor and an idiot merely because there are so many idiots that it’s simply not funny…. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-10 18:31:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083431206522441728
Reply addressees: @pirateblade86
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083427193450049537
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083427193450049537
-
So that is your criteria for truth? I mean, is that the worst criticism you can
So that is your criteria for truth? I mean, is that the worst criticism you can levy at them?
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-10 18:14:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083426886980698112
Reply addressees: @pirateblade86
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083426014301245441
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083426014301245441
-
“Logic and definitions are obviously tools of oppression invented by white heter
—“Logic and definitions are obviously tools of oppression invented by white hetero normative cis males”—Greg Hamilton
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-10 18:07:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083425029499641861
-
“Curt, don’t you think we should remove Taleb from the recommended people list?”
–“Curt, don’t you think we should remove Taleb from the recommended people list?”– Ahmed Reda
Um. we must forgive our friends for their occasional idiocy. Otherwise we will have no friends….
😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-10 13:51:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49271310_10156907624222264_290277604
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/49271310_10156907624222264_2902776049551015936_o_10156907624217264.jpg HUMOR AND TRUTH FROM /POL. ;)Richard HallHe’s not wrong though…Jan 10, 2019, 1:45 PMDavid McCarthyI’ve been hash tagging Propertarianism in political posts that come up in my feed and selling it in the words of John Mark as parasite proof government. Is this a bad idea? lol “We need Parasite Proof Government #propertarianism” just like thatJan 10, 2019, 2:33 PMM.G. GreyheartI bet you’re becoming a hit with the MGTOWs.Jan 10, 2019, 2:46 PMNicholas CilantraM.G. Greyheart trolling as always. 🙄Jan 10, 2019, 3:05 PMNicholas CilantraAll right wing movements will continue to fail. Propertarianism explains why and counters our failures
https://youtu.be/JQaaXbLi3uUJan 10, 2019, 3:09 PMRickyman Beistein*scanning for autism in supposed anon post to see if it was just Curt himself* Nope. Checks out.Jan 10, 2019, 3:10 PMMax CantuI want to see the replies lolJan 10, 2019, 3:15 PMChristopher HallPost the repliesJan 10, 2019, 3:23 PMCurt Doolittleonly one. usual libertarian stupidityJan 10, 2019, 3:31 PMSolomon VolodymyrRape is surely bad. Not even morally (no place here for morals, I know) but because it’s necessarily miscegenationJan 10, 2019, 3:32 PMDavid McCarthyMGTOW?Jan 10, 2019, 3:34 PMChristopher HallOh okJan 10, 2019, 3:36 PMLisa OuthwaitePerhaps if you were to offer up to the maiden targeted for a raping, a fully verifiable and well researched piece of testimony as to why it is a net gain for the commons that she be raped?Jan 10, 2019, 4:15 PMSolomon VolodymyrSpeaking as a moralfag, I fucking despise even the idea of rape. But there is no “propertarian” justification for it either.Jan 10, 2019, 4:29 PMLisa OuthwaiteSolomon Volodymyr You goddam moralfags make me sick. ;)Jan 10, 2019, 4:32 PMDoug RossRent seekers? Um wow that just vaulted you into the cool aid sectionJan 10, 2019, 6:23 PMEric GroseRape demoralizes the enemyJan 10, 2019, 7:07 PMMichael SheppardDavid McCarthy men go their own wayJan 10, 2019, 8:01 PMDavid McCarthyAh thanksJan 10, 2019, 10:23 PMNeggy Gen Vii Catholy fuck i gotta put aside time 2 actually research yur theoriesJan 11, 2019, 12:43 AMGlen DanielsI loathe people who cry “antisemitism” but your rant is half full of holes. Agree with some.
Nathan Confas’ rebuttal to Kmac was somewhat compelling.
Expulsions/forced conversions had several explanations, only a handful actually the fault of Jews. You already said you didnt care to research it (why bother, right?). Same point with usury. Requires context you’re more than happy not to provide.
Putting the destruction created by Christ mythos and Islam at the feet of Judaism is a massive stretch since they evolved to counter and attack (most of) it. This should be obvious but you seem to merely “move the ball” to wherever a connection with Jews exists (ie. “Abrahamism”). Convenient.
Other points are correct, especially “holocaustianity” being weaponized.
Bottom line, you’re not coming across as objective on this and it’s 99% of what you talk about. And the dual citizenship post was an outright lie that diaspora have no control over.
For what it’s worth, I agree with separation but solely based on their current neo-Marxism and political leanings. That whole realm is a legitimate reason to counter but the link to old world collective behavior hasn’t been made and seems non-existent.Jan 11, 2019, 2:14 AMBenjamin BakerDoug Ross (((rent seekers)))Jan 11, 2019, 5:59 AMDoug RossBenjamin Baker gotcha now makes more senseJan 11, 2019, 7:29 AMCurt DoolittleRead the three works I mentioned. Fatal Embrace, Solzhenitsyn, KMAC at the least. If you can counter those argumetns then you’ll have something to talk about.
Nathan Confas’ argument was childish and I didn’t respond because KMAC’s made it unnecessary. However KMAC was more kind than I would have been.
It’s not a stretch whatsoever. Read Catherine Nixey’s book.
I am not ‘forgiving’ which is wat you mean by ‘objective’. I am a prosecutor and now that I have understaood their grammar and semantics I understand that the group evolutionary strategy of the three via-negativa peoples: gypsies, jews, and Muslims is identical but defended by three different excusesJan 11, 2019, 4:47 PMDave Walshcurt’s daughter is married to an Indian why would i follow someone who preaches revolution but cant even keep his house in order.Jan 12, 2019, 12:12 PMPat RyanYou may find this enjoyable.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/148828096/?fbclid=IwAR2PfV99t8o_ljgeumhOVbBLti2C7IgZU4YUQOq46-p3p9J1uWAKUTlpKcY#148829107Jan 12, 2019, 2:07 PMHUMOR AND TRUTH FROM /POL. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-10 13:12:00 UTC
-
“Logic and definitions are obviously tools of oppression invented by white heter
—“Logic and definitions are obviously tools of oppression invented by white hetero normative cis males”—Greg Hamilton
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-10 13:07:00 UTC
-
“What is it that we mean by “metaphysics”? Is it the reverse-engineering of huma
—“What is it that we mean by “metaphysics”? Is it the reverse-engineering of human cognition? Is it really so useless to try to reverse-engineer the mind? I could accept something of the sort of: “doing metaphysics even of the sort of naturalistic inquiry that you profess requires the sort of social institutions or commons that would be too vulnerable to parasitism”.”— Adam Voight
Short Answer: Metaphysics is looking for means of cheating.
What I think we call metaphysics is the discipline of trying to create a fictional narrative that justifies our means of survival, competition, prospering, and signaling given our abilities, means, and conditions. So an ‘ontology” (paradigm) that ‘lets me get what I want’. Where my approach is ‘here is the paradigm’ now negotiate within it for what you want, don’t make an excuse that what you want is ‘good’ so that you can engage in all sorts of discounting (cheating).
The rest of the ontologies (paradigms) are just networks on top of that base ontology (paradigm) of human action (perception, cognition, memory, calculation, speech, negotiation, action).
Well, I mean I worked on AI, and now we have cognitive science, and we have language that expresses the content of the mind, so it’s pretty easy.
I mean, I think I have a pretty good understanding of how the mind works, and I’ve come to understand it’s actually not complicated, it’s just an emergent phenomenon of enough hierarchical memory, and the devotion of so much of that memory to the continuous production of serialized speech so that we can negotiate cooperation with others, because cooperation produces such ridiculously outsized returns on calories that language and cooperation are more valuable than any other caloric expenditure.
In my book I teach that the human body, intuition, and mind provide a the system of measurement we work with because it is all that we can work with because it is the only comparisons we are able to make – and that all language consists of measurements culminating in transactions.
The question is only the precision of those measurements on the one hand, the correspondence of those measurements, and the ignorance, error, bias, and deceit in those measurements.
I then use that system of measurement (operational language) to provide commensurability, and reframe all human experience, knowledge, and disciplines in that commensurable language.
Then I document every known method of deflating language to produce increased precision and decreased opportunity for conflation.
Then I document every known method of inflating language to engaging the masking of ignorance, and the generation of error, bias, and deceit.
Then I account for costs.
In other words the Metaphysics of Action turns out to be the only non-false model. The metaphysics of speech limited to action turns out to be the only non-false model. And the tests of costs whether at the physical or human level turns out to be the only non-false model.
This turns out to be what we do in court already when prosecuting a crime.
Which is why the west developed reason, empiricism, science: it all evolved out of our natural common law of sovereignty.
The moment you base your cognitive hierarchy on sovereignty (the individual) then there is no conflation available by which to ignore costs. This sentence is very profound. if you base it on anything else you invite (make excuses for) the unaccountable, adn the undecidable, leaving room for authoritarian or communal calculation.
This hierarchy of concepts is quite important really. It explains why so many thinkers went off the rails and why there is a proliferation of incommensurable ‘fictions’ in philosophy and theology and opinion.
“How can I cheat others?”
“How can I use cheating to rally large numbers of others?”
“How can I use cheating and rallying large numbers to obtain power?”
I see history as a few people trying to create truth and productivity, a lot of people lying and cheating, and a lot more trying to get by with the lies, cheating, and stealing that they can get away with in the current context.
Because I study science and the law and economics and not philosophy ,theology, literature, or what passes for history but is largely propaganda.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-10 12:50:00 UTC
-
um. use examples rather than abstraction so we dont miss the point
um. use examples rather than abstraction so we dont miss the point.
Source date (UTC): 2019-01-10 01:05:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083167957201637377
Reply addressees: @MusaVaino @DataDistribute
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083166088177897473
IN REPLY TO:
@MusaVaino
@curtdoolittle @DataDistribute I agree with that. Am I right thinking propertianism forbids unequal trade between consenting parties?If so what happens to free trade?As I see it when first world country trades with third world country. It is rarely equal trade. Would this hinder third world countries growth?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1083166088177897473