Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52508044_10156975689627264_544311565

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52508044_10156975689627264_544311565

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/52508044_10156975689627264_5443115653126946816_n_10156975689622264.jpg Steven MillerI’ve tried to explain small portions of propertarianism to “normie” people I know and this notion is the brick wall. They agree with everything else but this is the deal breaker. How do I maneuver around this? Do I start with attacking the sky daddy? Omit that part all together?Feb 9, 2019, 7:13 PMJohn MarkSteven Miller I tell them you cam have your religion you just cant let it be parasitic. “I believe in Jesus” yes. “I believe in Jesus therefore we must invite 10 million 85-IQ 3rd worlders into our country” no.Feb 9, 2019, 8:01 PMSteven MillerThe people I talk with want their political representatives to be openly religious and make decisions from that base. They dont want immigration. I dont really bother with speaking to Democrats as I have better things to waste my time on.

    This topic is becoming my go-to because it is my only challenge. I know people will dismiss Curt’s work because of the delivery so I try to dumb it down but I dont know how to dumb this topic down. The generational religious brainwashing is strongFeb 9, 2019, 9:02 PMCharles M TriplettSteven Miller I hold strong religious convictions. With that offered at the outset, I would be more inclined to support a government rooted in my same religious beliefs than I would an atheistic government, or one of false religion (Islam, Catholicism, etc.), because however bad religious governments may have been in the past, Godless governments are much worse, for they have nothing restraining them from evil works.Feb 9, 2019, 9:27 PMJohn MarkSteven Miller tactic to try possibly: “why are there so many different Christian denominations who all interpret the Bible differently?” (“Uhhh…) Answer: “the Bible is easy to misinterpret. Do you want our law to be easy to misinterpret so parasites can get a foot in the door? The law has to be bulletproof. Thus our law cannot be based on the Bible cuz too long, too easy to misinterpret & Jesus hasn’t shown up yet to interpret it perfectly.”

    Also – “you’ve never had a Christian President. They all claim to be, but none of them is a true Christian, including Trump. If you want a Christian president/ruler/leader/king, come up with a plan to make it happen. We (Propertarians) have a plan to institute parasite-proof govt, we have a parasite-proof constitution written (almost finished), and it punishes evil like the book of Romans says govt is supposed to do. Get on board or get out of the way. Until Jesus comes back hop on board the next best thing.”Feb 9, 2019, 10:09 PMCurt DoolittleVery very smart.Feb 9, 2019, 10:10 PMCurtus MaximusSteven Miller You’re right, the brainwashing is strong.

    Come at it from the economist’s perspective, then work your way to showing them how lies of others can serve to aid in direct theft in things that matter to them like things they consider property. And that currently the only way to keep these people from aiding in that theft entails ending their lies and forcing them into a form of negotiation instead.

    And when it comes to the religious stuff, you have to treat the message very delicately. But like I’ve done with you (in my opinion), the strategy I used with you came to me easily because I already know you, and I (at least I think I know you) know that you care about others well-being, you always try to lighten up the situation with good humor and sincerity, and you make very wise decisions in how you treat others.

    So, I knew you wanted assurance that people you consider innocent people could have their unique way they get fulfillment out of life preserved for them to keep. Which, I think I did that fairly successfully so far.Feb 9, 2019, 10:36 PMSteven MillerIn my experience, the difference of interpretation doesnt matter as long as the core beliefs are the same. As the man above said, a Christian gt is better than an atheist gt.

    The ultimatum approach may work when the “time” comes but in everyday conversation it won’t.Feb 9, 2019, 10:36 PMCurt DoolittleThere is no conflict between christianity and the natural law – they are identical. However, there is a profound conflict between what christians may publicly claim is true and the natural law. This is a problem for christianity per se, just as it is for islam and judaism. If there is a conflict between christianity(faith) and the law(science) then science prevails under the law,Feb 9, 2019, 10:40 PMJohn MarkSteven Miller the ultimatum approach combined with “there have been no sincere christian presidents (at least not recently) is designed to remind them that there is a huge difference between what they want, and what they get. To snap them out of their idealism. Do you want to be ruled by leftism? Or not? We have a solution. To demand that our solution have a christian leader at the top of it is ridiculous since you dont have that now and never have.Feb 9, 2019, 10:49 PMCurtus MaximusSteven Miller I think you (by that I mean hypothetically you along with others with similar or virtually identical evolutionary strategies) could form your own form of gt however you’d like given you’ve created it honestly and contractually and it passes the test of scientific morality. Then on top of that you can do whatever, if I interpret how the propertarian system would work correctly.Feb 9, 2019, 10:57 PMSteven MillerGood stuff here. I keep coming back to this subject as I see as the only thing to stop us. I’ve been slowly chipping away at my immediate circle of influence. My strategy has always been devil’s advocate but I think it’s time for a more direct approach.Feb 9, 2019, 11:05 PMCurtus MaximusSteven Miller Good luck. Try using the e-prime and write some thoughts down in it. You may have some insights.Feb 9, 2019, 11:08 PMSteven MillerThat’s like Greek to most people. I have to translate for everyone I’ve shown it to. No, you all have that horse to ride. I’m just trying to see we all arrive at the same place.Feb 9, 2019, 11:11 PMBenjamin IrelandHe’s not invisible, he’s just really far away!Feb 10, 2019, 12:21 AMGreg HamiltonBenjamin Ireland or is he really close and really really small?Feb 13, 2019, 5:53 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 17:59:00 UTC

  • AGAINST CRITICISM ON WORKING IN PUBLIC *POLICY:TRANSPARENCY* (i.e. “CURT: WHY NO

    AGAINST CRITICISM ON WORKING IN PUBLIC

    *POLICY:TRANSPARENCY*

    (i.e. “CURT: WHY NO SECRECY!!!”)

    1 – I do my work out in the open with my real name. I always have.

    2 – I educate our people on how to produce and implement a restoration of the constitution that will allow us reclaim our destiny by constitutional amendment, and certainty of members of the state the rebellion to enact it – or to cause secession between those who do and do not wish so.

    3 – I do this to provide an actionable solution that will prevent the bloodiest civil war in human history that is one spark from igniting, and one that has been deterministic since the 1965 socialist transition of immigration from kin to aliens.

    4 – I NEVER EVER cross the line to advocacy or organization or participation in direct action. I seek only to make our people understand that if we did choose to revolt that our success is a virtual certainty and therefore to make the state end its denial that we would.

    5 – If you cannot do the same then I can’t be associated with you, and I don’t want to. You are a danger to me and our people

    6 – All ‘secret’ activity only attracts the wrong people, with the wrong incentives, to engaging in the wrong behaviors, that will end in their and our harm.

    7 – All any action by the state against me as a thought leader working on restoration of the constitution to prevent its usurpation, and the creation of policies in the defense of our people from economic, cultural, and genetic predation would only serve to demonstrate to the people we seek to reach the corruption of that government, and in turn grant additional legitimacy to both the promise of my work, and the promise of our ability to force our self defense into the body of law.

    8 – If we must, at some future time, act, then we must and will act toward a moral end, with an actionable plan, and all act at once. And in the interim we must constraint all lunatics from preventing our expansion into the majority and the provision of solutions for the vast majority of our people – exclusive of those fools, traitors and enemies among them.

    9 – Only the more sophisticated followers understand how I use the ‘marketplace’ of the internet to criticize ideas, whittle away at them, and discover those few grains of truth therein. Only the more sophisticated followers understand how I use the king of the hill game to run those tests. At any given time I might be testing any set of ideas by king of the hill games, to get you to defeat them so that I understand how to replace those ideas with better ones. I don’t want you to understand what I am doing. If you undrestand I am playing this game, and running these tests, then their utility declines. The secret to any psychological testing is to work indirectly by appealing to people’s intuitions such that their natural tendency to signal rather than report is circumvented. This is is how I work. I create games that indirectly allow me to discover possibilities. I do not start with presumptions, I simply start with what is presumed, and attack it until only a few grains of truth remain. With those gains of truth I then reconstruct the law. What we do with that law is up to us – should we obtain the power to enforce its adoption. And I must convince you only that we both have the power, and that the laws once enacted will serve our purposes. This means that all my work was in the construction of the law, the rest is only the policy we enact by that law, and the incentives of citizens to use the law to suppress, defeat, or exit those who continue the 2500 year war against our people.

    Thank you for your time.

    -Curt Doolittle

    ======

    FROMl: thisisnotmyemail@hotmail.com

    REGARDING: https://ordoevangelistarum.com/

    Sir, I love your thoughts but am not happy with your boomer-tier tools. Thomas Lewis from Ordo Evangelistarum has the right ideas when it comes to implementing websites, forums, and comms. He only uses open source programs that have been rigorously tested. He is also friends with some honorable computer nerds that help him out.

    You use gmail. For the love of god, why? I’m not emailing you only to be flagged by the crazed technocrats at google for not thinking like them. Discord is run by a bunch of SJWs who do not share anything with you in common either. Once again, I wont be using discord.

    Open source alternatives like OE is using.

    1) comms. Riot app using decentralized matrix servers. Thomas has his own server which he controls. I prefer servers in third world countries because why not.

    2) Forum. He uses Discord which is simple and effective and once again, you control it yourself.

    At least use some free tools that arent made around collecting user data to sell. Other than that, my respect for you overrides any disdain I have for your boomer tech strategy.

    ====


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 17:07:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51816572_10156975527472264_908346010

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51816572_10156975527472264_908346010

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/51816572_10156975527472264_9083460109933215744_o_10156975527467264.jpg HOW TO ANSWER GSRRM CRITICISMS

    (Do not treat all our people as equal in agency.)Christian KalafutI do think that it’s too materialistic – not even the Hellenes were this materialist in pholosophy (depending on who you read)Feb 9, 2019, 4:27 PMCurt Doolittlewell you are a dishonest advocate for supernatural authoritarianism and the continued imprisonment and conquest of our people by our eternal enemy.Feb 9, 2019, 4:29 PMChristian KalafutThis was no denunciation curtFeb 9, 2019, 4:29 PMChristian KalafutBut while in theory its about markets, and often times in practice, I think therr is more to the breath of life then material goods.Feb 9, 2019, 4:30 PMCurt DoolittleOnly because you are an addict defending your addiction.Feb 9, 2019, 4:30 PMCurt DoolittleChristian Kalafut not an argument. You think many false and foolish things. Why would what you think matter?Feb 9, 2019, 4:30 PMCurt DoolittleI mean, youi’re a liar and a carrier of lies. I only don’t block you to mock you.Feb 9, 2019, 4:31 PMChristian KalafutI say things you disagree with but many things I do say you happen to agreeFeb 9, 2019, 4:31 PMChristian KalafutYou’ve shared quotes of mine (earnestly) on your wall.Feb 9, 2019, 4:32 PMChristian KalafutPhilosophers do not always agreeFeb 9, 2019, 4:33 PMChristian KalafutDiedrot had many a skirmish with Voltaire.Feb 9, 2019, 4:33 PMChristian KalafutThe spirit and ethos of ehst your saying is very Voltairian.Feb 9, 2019, 4:34 PMGreg HamiltonI’m not sure how all of reality, your nation and people, and your family is “materialistic”

    I mean if you can’t find inspiration for being in all of that I don’t see how an invisible man is going to help any.Feb 9, 2019, 4:35 PMCurt DoolittleHalf truths are still half lies, and you are nothing but a sophist, supernaturalist, and liar, and a threat to the survival of our people.

    Even a broken clock is right twice a day. I do not care if madmen or my enemy says something useful. The origin of information has no bearing on its truth content. That would be contra falsificationary.

    You are still a dishonest apologist for christianity, and I only call myself a philosopher to avoid confusion. As far as I know what I do is a science of the law (cooperation).

    You are not a philosopher. The requirement to make that claim requires a system of thought. Or publication of an amendment to a system of thought. there are many people who write philosophy or philosophize (rationalise) but that tells us nothing. As far as I know philosophy is dead, and the evidence is it’s inclusion in religion rather than math, logic, science, engineering, economics, law.

    There is nothing ‘voluntarian’ it is simplyr eciprocity under the rule of law of the anglo saxons and their germanic ancestors, and the european IE expansion before them.

    All you do is waste my time and provide vehicles for how others can conduct arguments against others such fictionalists.

    ;)Feb 9, 2019, 4:40 PMCurt Doolittleit’s more that ‘if you can’t find inspiration in that, then you are dead weight and an ongoing threat to our people’s survival.”Feb 9, 2019, 4:44 PMSteven KolpekCoding an Ideal for Propertarianism? [Live up to your forefather’s by defending your future]?Feb 9, 2019, 4:45 PMRichard HeathenGSRRM?Feb 9, 2019, 4:46 PMChristian KalafutI am talking about the 18th century philosopher Voltaire, not “voluntary”Feb 9, 2019, 4:56 PMChristian KalafutYou see I am an historian and a musician/lyricist first and foremost.Feb 9, 2019, 4:58 PMChristian KalafutI think that you dwell too much on my faith rather than the Truth of what I am saying.Feb 9, 2019, 4:59 PMChristian KalafutWhat I am saying is what you believe, is nothing new in Western history; most of the upper classes of West Europe carried views, though less systematized and apportioned, very similar to yours. The view that there was a ‘thousand years of darkness between Julian and the Enlightenment” is an old, tired meme; in terms of Historiography it’s purely a Gibbonian smear and a rejection of History as it actually was.Feb 9, 2019, 5:04 PMGreg HamiltonCurt Doolittle and honestly people can believe in whatever they want in private.Feb 9, 2019, 5:08 PMCurt DoolittleGood point. Thank you . I always assume everyone presumes that and I shouldn’t. sorry.Feb 9, 2019, 5:12 PMGreg HamiltonI think these critics may think you’re saying that. But I’ve never heard that. Just that invisible men in the sky don’t get to be part of the law.Feb 9, 2019, 5:19 PMAlexander ByronNot worth engaging in my opinion. Those comments are just noise, if one keeps listening to them, they will drown in said noise.Feb 9, 2019, 5:27 PMCurt DoolittleWhat’s wrong with materialism is meritocracy. Fictions, Supernaturalism and Sophism, and pseudoscience and their conflations provide an alternative mental model in which one’s lower status and therefore mindfulness is not continuously challenged daily evidence in reality.Feb 9, 2019, 5:34 PMAlain DwightGuilt, shame, rally, ridicule, mock.. something like that.

    What the left does instead of making arguments or developing agency.Feb 9, 2019, 5:37 PMGreg HamiltonCurt Doolittle nice. True. “If only” becomes the excuse for lack of success

    This is where communists, libertarians, objectivists etc all meet. Their beliefs require “if just only everybody would”Feb 9, 2019, 5:39 PMAlain Dwight*G is for gossipFeb 9, 2019, 5:47 PMCurt Doolittlegossip, shaming, ralling, ridiculing, and moralizing.

    in other words, demonstrating female disapproval.Feb 9, 2019, 5:49 PMChristian KalafutMaterialistic outlook is what got the commons into this mess in first place; I am not decrying the benifets that it has given us but such a way of viewing the world leads to ideologies like Marxism or Communism or things like the Party of Davos.Feb 9, 2019, 5:52 PMChristian KalafutRampant materialism and decadence what is killing our civilization the most right now. Remember that the houses of the leading men of Athens during the golden age were sparsley furnished in comparison to the decadent furnishings of the later Roman Republic. In fact, the sparser furnishing of the Athenian household is one of the many measures of brilliance in the history of that period.Feb 9, 2019, 5:56 PMRichard HeathenOk so rallying and shamingFeb 9, 2019, 5:58 PMCJ CarverChristian Kalafut If you could give yourself a smoker, would you do it?Feb 9, 2019, 6:10 PMBryan Nova BreyYour responses are highbrow hilarious.Feb 9, 2019, 6:19 PMAlain DwightMoralizing, that really ties it together.Feb 9, 2019, 6:55 PMEric BurkettI do not view truth as a materialistic desire, but as an idealistic construct to impose with the side effect of creating markets that optimize human interaction, reducing transactional costs and creating the conditions for affluence in many ways, not just resource accumulation.Feb 9, 2019, 7:20 PMSteven KolpekDoesn’t “ridicule” fall under “shame”? I liked the 4-letter acronym better.

    Gossip (slander, libel, defame)

    Shaming (ridicule, humiliate, chastize)

    Rallying (appeal to audience, dogpile)

    Moralizing (good vs. evil)Feb 9, 2019, 7:36 PMThomas NorgateCharlie Eddleston-Haynes Caspian Lipman-England Robert Henke this guy on the money againFeb 11, 2019, 8:41 AMHOW TO ANSWER GSRRM CRITICISMS

    (Do not treat all our people as equal in agency.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 16:25:00 UTC

  • POSITION ON “THE MYTH OF 20TH CENTURY” —“Have you read Alfred Rosenberg’s “The

    POSITION ON “THE MYTH OF 20TH CENTURY”

    —“Have you read Alfred Rosenberg’s “The Myth of the 20th Century”? If so, what’s your opinion?”— A Friend

    It’s in my reading list. I have come to the same conclusion (although I didn’t know of this but until a year or two ago). I agree with it entirely. My understanding of the cycles of history is similar. I consider Mein Kampf and MT20C required reading for this reason. And if I could find someone to teach MK, MT20C, MacDonald, Goldberg (The Fatal Embrace), by emphasis on these cycles of history and the Conflict of Civilizations, then I would do so. I think the war between semites and europeans continues unabated, and that while we held them off for 1500 years, reasonably well, their chances of winning by population replacement are still significant.

    The problem is separating the story of history, the problem itself, from the nazi ideology – which was possible at a certain time and place but such ‘ideology’ no longer has rather ignorant folk one generation from the fields to take root in.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 16:02:00 UTC

  • “Instead of teaching us to provide for ourselves, boomers gave us a dystopian mu

    —“Instead of teaching us to provide for ourselves, boomers gave us a dystopian multiracial nightmare, crippling debt, crushing anomie, political powerlessness and much more. But hey, we should be grateful because we have i-phones, right?”— Victor Blanc


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 15:37:00 UTC

  • @Victor Blanc Well, I mean: —“Lacking better alternatives, I’d become NatSoc/F

    @Victor Blanc

    Well, I mean:

    —“Lacking better alternatives, I’d become NatSoc/Fascist if it meant survival, and with the exception of Propertarianism, not much else is being provided (or at least popularised) in way of solutions.”—Victor Blanc

    That’s my argument as well.

    “Show me something better.”


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 15:35:00 UTC

  • SHOW PREP – J.F. Gariepy WHY OPEN DISCOURSE IN PUBLIC? THE DESPERATE FOR RELEVAN

    SHOW PREP – J.F. Gariepy

    WHY OPEN DISCOURSE IN PUBLIC?

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975600062264

    THE DESPERATE FOR RELEVANCE

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975353527264

    TOTAL MENTIONS OF SPENCER

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975165307264

    THE LANGUAGES OF MALE PACKS

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975183877264

    WHY TALK OF REVOLT, REVOLUTION, CIVIL WAR?

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975175932264

    LEGIT CRITICISM OF PROP

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156975105752264

    ANOTHER LEGIT CRITICISM OF PROP

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156971446347264

    MOST LEGIT CRITICISMS OF PROP

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156811437002264

    ANY GOOD ARGUMENTS FOR SUPREMACY?

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155415610782264


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 15:05:00 UTC

  • THE IRRELEVANCE OF THE DESPERATE FOR RELEVANCE I’m not listed anywhere by anyone

    THE IRRELEVANCE OF THE DESPERATE FOR RELEVANCE

    I’m not listed anywhere by anyone in any canon, registry, article, or map as ‘alt right’. I didn’t want to be associated with the alt right. I tried the moniker New Right but Paul Joseph Watson started using it, and I hadn’t TM’d it so I lost that one.

    I can sympathize with the alt right as a movement of justifiably dissatisfied young men, copying Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals and making use of new technology to achieve against the left with the interet what the left achieved with media against the rest of us.

    And I’m “On The Right” in the sense that I’m a conservative libertarian (sovereignty, and private property) – which makes me a rule-of-law rightist rather than an authoritarian or religious rightist. In my ideal world we have a rule of law by natural law, an independent judiciary, an hereditary monarchy, professional ministers, some set of class based houses of veto allocated by random selection, and something that would look very much like intolerant nationalism in the interwar french and german model. If that sounds like fascism, it’s simply extremely intolerant anglo monarchy under rule of law.

    John Mark has made us very popular very fast. Faster than we had ever imagined. Because his message sells, and he’s a hell of a smart guy, with media ready personality, and quality writer and producer.

    People of good character sell by their nature. People of poor character do not sell because of their nature. John is a man of good character and his message sells accordingly.

    ATTENTION DEFICIT DESPERATION DISORDER

    The current round of criticism is driven by Josh Jeppeson (Imperius) > Dylan Thomas (TruDilTom) and Dylan’s cohost (I won’t name) > Richard (Dicky) Spencer.

    Josh recruited Moritz Bierling, [name removed] and Joel Davis from my followers. Young smart guys with great promise but lacking skin in the game (family, career, biz) a need for aesthetics – which means “secular religious zeal”.

    And some of these folks attempted to stir conflict with me and those people who work with me.

    GENERAL OBSERVATIONS ABOUT YOUNG SMART MEN

    Those without agency or responsibility in a sphere of influence(family, social, economic, political, military) generate demand for authority whether intelligent or dim, knowledgeable or ignorant. And they do so by means that they can participate in: sophism, supernatural sophism, economic sophism and pseudoscience and political pseudoscience and sophism. Because passion (emotion), persuasion(sophism), and pretense of knowledge, is all that they have to work with. And as with any market product ‘there is a sucker born every minute’ for every grammar of advocacy and persuasion.

    Each of us demonstrates a moral intuition a grammar of advocacy, argument, and resistance, and these demonstrations reflect our sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value. In other words, our moral intuitions reflect our reproductive strategies; our method of argument reflect those reproductive strategies. Each of us demonstrates at every single moment our sexual social economic, political, and military value with every expression gesture, display, dress, word, and deed – with humans working very hard to signal falsehoods: children their value in association, and women notoriously their youth, and men notoriously their future potential to the pack.

    So as a result we see the dim pursue religion, the less dim secular spiritualism or the occult, the less dim framing and sophism, the less dim pseudoscience. But those with agency, in a sphere of influence, with assets, relations, knowledge, and experience, simply use truth and utility, and rather than inspire, or persuade, they provide rational incentives for possible practical means of operating the familial, social, economic, political, and military order.

    Everything you want to know about an individual can be determined by his means of advocacy, argument, and resistance. Grammars of argument, just like vocabulary, are insights into the operations of the human mind. And there exist a limited number of NON CORRESPONDENT grammars to work with just as there are a limited number of personality traits.

    Megan Usui was an insider advising and promoting me. Unfortunately she was backchannel working with Jeppeson – I love her but good intentioned people are easily fooled. I think they concocted some idea of uniting the hard right. Of “bringing us all together”. Something ‘undesirable’.

    But Jeppeson is a sociopath and coat-tail rider. He tried to do something himself and couldn’t’. Tried to ride my coattails. And yes, I’m too tolerant of human pound puppies, but you know, after the tenth rage-quit and death threat, even the most tolerant of people disconnect and keep you at arm’s length.

    Megan worked up the meeting in NY with me Duchesne and Macdonald. Jeppeson spent the entire summer trying to convince megan that I couldn’t do it for some reason and that he should instead. (laughable.) Then another death threat, this time in public, on voice chat. I threatened to turn him into cops. It worked and he got quiet for a bit.

    Spencer is desperate for relevance, and the rest of the ‘leadership’ so to speak has simply ignored him. However, we are the rising stars and will be able to reach far larger numbers than the ‘alt right’, because we are selling a portfolio of solutions that will produce right, libertarian, and centrist ends, at the sole expense of the very bottom and very top – and natural incentives and pressures will do the rest. The secret to collapsing a dam or a fortress wall, is to weaken it and let the natural gravity of the environment do the work for you as a consequence.

    A good way of capturing attention is to undermine the competition. This is the strategy of female proxy for violence: undermining. Women gossip, shame, ridicule, rally,moralize (“GSRRM”), and they do so to hold back competitors rather than to to provide opportunities superior to those of competitors. Evidence suggests that the origin of language has as much to do with GSSRM to control alphas and redistribute control of reproduction as it does for hunters to communicate – when hunting is an almost entirely silent occupation. (The counter is that whenever GSSRM is used against you, retaliate with it, then repeat the central point. Use each volley GSSRM as a means of promoting your central point and thesis, and simply wear out the other party’s reliance on GSSRM. Over time people learn that GSSRM “hats are empty” so to speak. This takes patience but it always succeeds.)

    Dylan seemed interested in P, but I’m guessing was pursued Jeppson, who then rode Dylan’s coattails and rage crashed their group at some point but I don’t know if he still does.

    He’s riding Richards coattails now, and Jeppeson’s a lot smarter than Spencer. (God knows Spencer’s not smart enough to comprehend my work. What did he accomplish other than being the poster child for what NOT to do?) So Richard makes a good sock puppet for Jeppeson who is hoping to make Spencer relevant again. Despite the fact that Richard is selling inspiration to empty halls and was only relevant as a whipping boy for the press.

    Jeppeson and Dylan were pitching a somewhat novel version authoritarian postmodernism by combining a bit of pseudoscience and sophism. (Like Derrida, social construction, and therefore authoritarianism.) And it’s going nowhere for obvious reasons. But there are suckers born every minute and suckers for sophism are everywhere, just as suckers for passion, supernaturalism and pseudoscience are everywhere.

    So these guys, who have never accomplished anything in life – not even so much as a family, career, or small business but have grandiose visions of themselves and their understanding of the world (despite lack of evidence) are merely pursuing self interest – not our group interests. In this sense, in hindsight I almost wish the deplatforming was more successful so that bad I deas could not be funded so easily by donations from those susceptible to each non-correspondent grammar of persuasion.

    And so between two sock puppets and a sociopath we undrestand the scramble for relevance – the desperate cries for attention.

    GOING MAINSTREAM

    We (our folks) have tried the direct message (constitutional change desirable by the majority of our people) with the only method anyone thinks will work (mass resistance, uprising, or conflict) and given that the people are frustrated, they are buying the message because of it.

    They’re buying it because It isn’t a message about ‘follow me’. Or a message of handwaving. It’s a message that we have the power to alter the course of events if we choose, and we have an actionable plan of change that will restore our laboring working and middle classes at the expense of the financial, media, and political classes, and end the redistribution of our reproduction to invaders.

    Now this might not work. But it is the only deal on the table at the moment that isn’t evangelism, hand waving, woo, or unmarketable – and it’s certainly open to improvement and revision.

    LEAVE THEM BEHIND

    The irrelevant get left behind, because they deserve to be. But we should not expect the irrelevant to continue to disappear without desperately trying to preserve the attention they garner.

    One bad apple spoils the whole movement. Richard is irrelevant and poisonous to our success, and Jeppeson is just sociopath and cancer and always has been. The rest are probably well intentioned cerebral young men without any agency or experience seeking ideals as substitute for sphere of influence (family, business etc).

    “CLEAN OUR HOUSE FIRST” (so to speak)

    -Curt Doolittle

    -The Propertarian Institute

    ——-

    People Mentioned in this post:

    – Richard Spencer

    – Josh Jeppeson (alias Josh Jeppson, “imperius”)

    – Dylan Thomas (TruDilTom)

    – Joel Davis ( Joel Davis )


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 14:54:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 13:10:00 UTC

  • TOTAL NUMBER OF SPENCER MENTIONS IN MY DB (there is one more I remember doing a

    TOTAL NUMBER OF SPENCER MENTIONS IN MY DB

    (there is one more I remember doing a grid of alt right classes)

    I don’t punch right unless a punch is thrown first. But start a fight with me and my position is ‘defeat an enemy completely and permanently’

    Here is my position and it has been my position since at least 2016. And before 2016 I thought politics wasn’t worth my time.

    — EXCERPT OF POSITIONING STATEMENT 01.29.2017–

    Here. Look how many ‘languages’ we are speaking in now:

    Spencer is working on WN, (wn)

    The green frog crew is working on ridicule. (alt)

    RamzPaul is working on pop criticism (alt)

    PJW is working on media criticism. (new)

    Moly is working on pure education. (lagging but getting there)

    Mike is working “within the system” (new)

    I’m working on ‘the next system’. (new)

    This movement covers the spectrum from separatism, to ridicule, to criticism, to education, to reformation, to revolution. And covers the classes from lower working to intellectuals.

    And that’ exactly what we NEED to do. No everyone is capable of the full spectrum of understanding or the full spectrum of arguments.

    The middle will, and the lower middle will, always hold the numbers, and provide the upper middle provide leadership. The bottom provides the soldiers, and the top provides the political solutions.

    THIS IS HOW REVOLUTIONS ARE MADE: FULL MOBILIZATION.

    We don’t need ‘one-ness’ in argument. We need one ambition: CHANGE. The change you fight for will depend on your believe in what can be accomplished. Some within the process (evidence is contrary) and some using rebellion to overwhelm the existing process (anglos have this history of constitutional revision in times of change), and some of us with revolution so that the threat of chaos will force the existing process of change. and some want to burn the house down and see what rises from the Joker’s ashes. (That strategy always seems to fail).

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    —-PACK LANGUAGES VS HERD LANGUAGE—

    The Herd All Speaks the Same Language. the Packs Don’t.

    JULY 22, 2018

    The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The more right (masculine) we intuit, the more we seek allies in a pack.

    Furthermore we choose our pack leaders, and we choose our packs, and our pack propaganda (signaling) and strategy (directness) by what we perceive as actionable and voluntary.

    And as such we form packs by class, and by class within age groups although they appear to be only younger(direct and tactical) and older(indirect and strategic) – as our energies (direct) and experience (indirect) warrant

    But whereas the left can be opportunistic, and the herd will follow opportunities. The right can be opportunistic, but will seize fewer opportunities, requiring more momentum and urgency for critical mass.

    And whereas the left herd follows opportunities they are opportunities against the right. Whereas the right packs seek only those opportunities to resist the left’s parasitism.

    So this is why I am still struggling with the Natsoc, WN, working classes – and for no reason. They need an opportunity to obtain what they want. But they can do nothing other than fight.

    So we are in a much harder position than the left. We are operating from a position of defense, and we have a harder time pulling together enough allies on critical mass, unless there is an event that provides possible movement for all.

    The herd all speaks the same language. The packs don’t.

    —MENTIONS OF SPENCER—

    Note that in every case it is either respectful or I’m sharing a post by someone else that is general interest that merely mentions him.

    SHARED Feb 3, 2019, IN RESPONSE TO SPENCER

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156961844687264

    SHARED Dec 29, 2018, 12:28 AM RESPONSE TO SPENCER/MARK

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156880177817264

    SHARED: Apr 17, 2018, 7:29 AM

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156293552552264

    SHARED Jan 14, 2018, 9:55 AM

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156039108437264

    SHARED Mar 18, 2017, 2:55 PM

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10155141283657264

    SHARED Jan 29, 2017, 8:26 AM

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154982642257264

    JAN 28th 2017 VIA CERNOVICH

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10154982642257264


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-09 13:03:00 UTC