Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • I just read the Manafort thing and … it’s garden variety nonsense, none of whi

    I just read the Manafort thing and … it’s garden variety nonsense, none of which is material, and the most severe of which might in a million years be worthy of some fines.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 20:02:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099399070378905600

  • I think this makes sense to you. It doesn’t make sense to me. I said none of the

    I think this makes sense to you. It doesn’t make sense to me. I said none of the right’s groups have a chance alone. Only together, and only together with enough of the mainstream. And that the mainstream will choose practical solutions, not christian, fascist, anarchic extremes.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 19:57:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099397763073261569

    Reply addressees: @EvanPlatinum

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099396204171915266


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099396204171915266

  • (Today in absurd video. Russian cops making some woman do nipple prints in addit

    (Today in absurd video. Russian cops making some woman do nipple prints in addition to finger prints. Seriously. You just can’t make this stuff up.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 15:27:00 UTC

  • I mean, once I have your number, and I let the goyim know, all you can do is fee

    I mean, once I have your number, and I let the goyim know, all you can do is feed the bigger fish that’s eating you.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 14:26:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099314561348485121

  • REPEATING – I DON’T HATE ON PEOPLE – THE JQ ANSWERED. (core) Someone just sugges

    REPEATING – I DON’T HATE ON PEOPLE – THE JQ ANSWERED.

    (core)

    Someone just suggested I reiterate. I don’t do hate on people, but on ideas.

    (Although I do a lot of anger and frustration, because I don’t suffer fools, sophists, supernaturalists, or the intellectually dishonest.)

    0. Propertarianism is a social science written in the grammars of law and economics. The product of that work is universal like all sciences. Any people can use it. It is easier for our people to use it because we have higher trust, lower corruption, and more experience under empirical truth and rule of law, because we have been a middle class or middle class organized polity for longer than all other peoples.

    1. I view the Ashkenazim as ‘ours’ – genetically they are half ours, and we’ve “bought and paid for their inclusion” in our polity so to speak over the centuries – at the costs of tens of millions of lives, vast abuse by extreme usury, undermining of every one of our nations, and cultures, and much of our great civil wars.

    2. But I view their problem as ours – our failure to adapt the law to prohibit parasitism upon the commons, false promise and baiting in to moral hazard, and the use of pilpul and critique, including the defense of all of the above by GSRRM.

    3. I view the problem of this kind behavior as relatively easily solved by law – law which I have produced, by accident really, as a byproduct of attempting to explain our own group strategy in scientific terms.

    4. I view the ending of the malincentives of the industries in which they employ false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul, critique, and GSRRM resulting in continuous undermining of our civlization as relatively easy – using the law I have produced.

    5. I view restoring our high trust society, the civil society, the family, and the market between men and women, definancializing our society, depoliticizing it, de-programming it, cleaning the academy, the media, the government, and business, finance, economics, and law, of this behavior relatively easy – using the law I have produced.

    I DON’T AVOID THE QUESTION – I SHOW YOU THE MIRROR

    So, I don’t avoid the JQ. I explain it. I answer it. I say how to productively solve it. And I do it without hating on anything except our traditional differences in group competition that like all differences must be ameliorated by incremental suppression of novel means of parasitism, by the incremental evolution of the common law of tort.

    IS THIS A CIVNAT POSITION?

    Well, I write LAW. Whatever government you want to produce, whether nationalist, civic nationalist, or globalist, and no matter what economic model you may want to produce, you can do it with P-LAW as long as you do it truthfully and transparently, without fictionalisms, lying, and GSRRM. So it’s an ethno nationalist, civic nationalist, or globalist position.

    WHAT ABOUT ETHNOCENTRISM?

    My position is scientific: (a) ethnocentrism is always and everywhere the optimum group strategy, (b) it is the optimum international order always and everywhere (c) scale is only valuable for (i) suicide by debt expansion, (ii) use of suicide by debt expansion in the production of industrial (Gen 2 and Gen 3) warfare, in an age where hand to hand, and rifle, and mechanized infantry, have been replaced by supersonic autonomous nuclear weaponry – all but eliminating the utility of population and scale from the equation.

    WHAT’S MY PERSONAL OPINION?

    If you want my opinion (i) we are (at least our productive classes) incompatible with peoples who have practiced less self domestication (lower class size reduction, and neotonic evolution) without tragic cost to our future, to ourselves, and to our ancestors (ii) I ‘demand’ ethnocentric polity and (ii) no people or group of people have the right to deny it without conducting genocide, for which genocide is the only possible reciprocity. (iiii) I am willing to demand restitution for past and present lifetime crimes by those that attempt to make that decision for me and mine.

    PRODUCE INCENTIVES BY LAW – THE REST WILL FOLLOW.

    There are no other people other than east asians that are sufficiently compatible with us because they are the only other people more self-domesticated than we are. And there is no need for population, particularly underclass population, in an era where labor is no longer competitive in the international market therefore producing a deadweight cost burden on us for eternity.

    YOU DON”T NEED TO “BELIEVE” THE LAW

    People don’t have to believe in or agree with the Law. They just need to avoid it. They don’t need to be trained. Or educated. Incentives ripple through the economy and polity almost instantaneously. All that is required is incentive to report violations, and any violation of reciprocity that exposes anyone to risk provides incentive.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 11:18:00 UTC

  • Andy Ujku-Dardania A very insightful article. “Most of the groups that split fro

    https://arktos.com/2018/10/15/an-autopsy-on-the-ron-paul-revolution/?fbclid=IwAR0em3rgSCebIFLJiw5o6dQsUJSxv81NH9DJBIfAe1mM6eMqVjPNTd5nGs0via Andy Ujku-Dardania

    https://arktos.com/…/an-autopsy-on-the-ron-paul-revolution/…

    A very insightful article.

    “Most of the groups that split from the Ron Paul movement are caught in a political twilight zone, forever pontificating about unattainable and ultimately illogical goals, unable or unwilling to ask the questions that finally, fully explain what makes society function.”

    “Yes, social systems and principles are important, but who builds social systems and outlines principles? People. Humans are not robots that can simply download new moral schemes or codes of conduct; we are animals, many of which cannot understand or be made to care about anything more complex than where the next emotional or sensory thrill will come from.”

    “In the end, libertarianism fails because it is trying to answer a question of who? with a description of what. The critical factor in society and politics is not systems and principles as such; it is if and how certain systems and principles can ever be adopted – which leads inevitably to the question of what human material provides fertile ground for what systems and principles.

    Libertarianism, it turns out, is simply an ‘autistic’ codifying of what most white males do, and value, without being told. Or, perhaps more accurately, libertarianism is a codifying of what most white males would do, in a world in which they were not browbeaten and fooled into endorsing Marxist egalitarianism.“

    “Alt-righters, broadly speaking, are just libertarians who realized that we – that is, white people – cannot save the world. We cannot rewire the brains of black or brown people, or even Northeast Asians, so that these groups will, as groups, enthusiastically embrace Lockean property rights. It will simply never happen. A multicultural utopia – of a libertarian or any other variety – is biologically impossible.”


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 10:23:00 UTC

  • I mean, once I have your number, and I let the goyim know, all you can do is fee

    I mean, once I have your number, and I let the goyim know, all you can do is feed the bigger fish that’s eating you.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 09:26:00 UTC

  • CONTINUOUS DEMONSTRATION OF THE LIE. —“You claim to have a monopoly on truth.

    CONTINUOUS DEMONSTRATION OF THE LIE.

    —“You claim to have a monopoly on truth. The only honest position here is to admit there is no monopoly on truth.”—Noel Fritsch

    I don’t claim to have a monopoly on truth. I claim only that I can identify false speech, and that you’re lying. Period.

    Like you just did again – by false equivalence.

    And by doing so you demonstrate my point: christians are the vehicle for the propagation of the abrahamic means of lying.

    Like you just did.

    (I mean. you don’t get it. The game is up. The goyim know. and it will take a year but I will popularize this criticism of christians as the enemy of our people just as I have popularized other arguments. And all you can do is provide me with a continuous stream of evidence that I am correct.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 08:56:00 UTC

  • AN EXAMPLE OF COMMON CHRISTIAN DECEIT —“Propertarianism is a cult for people w

    AN EXAMPLE OF COMMON CHRISTIAN DECEIT

    —“Propertarianism is a cult for people who want to sound smart but aren’t.”—Kev Ahimsa

    —“Zero irritation, Jeremy. This is a lie. I ask simple questions.

    Then Curt gets angry and calls names and says (in many more words) “I don’t owe you a response, you’re not smart. My ego is bruised. Good luck in the civil war on your own, loser.”

    I’m open to seeing where I’ve been very irritated.

    If that happened, it’d have been a wrong response, and I’d own it. No reason to get upset over the internet.”— Noel Fritsch

    —“There are 2.2 billion Christians, do not alienate them Curt Doolittle, they could be useful allies”–…. This is almost verbatim from one of his posts. I’ve been following quietly for 2-3 years now, and do not chime in: “Hey Curt. I realize that the majority of American Jews are communists, but I would really like you to alter your philosophy to accommodate my needs. Just ignore the truth, ok? I am ostensibly looking for a better world for my family, but I would rather not upset the status quo, so just work that out for me. Stat. Just leave my religion alone.” What if there are in fact fundamental errors that need to be corrected?— Jeremy Bernstein

    (Thank you Jeremy Bernstein)

    Don’t be dishonest Noel.

    I get frustrated because you are trying to advance supernaturalism and the means of deceit it is communicated with, and I’m trying to end it – plus you engage in GSRM.

    So It doesn’t have anything to do with wit wisdom or quality of your questions, or depth of your criticism, or your character, it has to do with you’re WASTING my time. And you are wasting my time (just as you are now) because there is no ‘TRUTH’ argument for your cult – there is only ‘UTILITY’ argument.

    Well, there is utility argument for every excuse. Same argument EVERY cult, ideology, or philosophical disposition makes. It’s undecidable. Truth provides decidability. Utility only provides preference.

    Truth doesn’t unite into a monopoly (which is what you want – monopoly of lies) it unites on MARKETS under RULE OF LAW, where every little group gets whatever it wants in TRADE, without such horrors as Xian, Muslim, monopolies.

    So stop wasting my time. You and yours are the enemy of our people preventing the restoration of our people from the curse of supernaturalism and deceit.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 08:47:00 UTC

  • well done

    well done.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 07:40:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099212297434816512

    Reply addressees: @BhriguTheBard

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098372279594115072


    IN REPLY TO:

    @BhriguTheBard

    Through these vicissitudes of space-time, one thought always lingers: nothing is more important than Truth. An easy word, a difficult verb.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1098372279594115072