Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • 2019-03-18

    https://t.co/rdPTWHjQ3R


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-18 14:39:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1107652840581926912

  • RETRACTION RETRACTION RETRACTION I confused Molyneux with Kinsella. Apologies al

    RETRACTION RETRACTION RETRACTION

    I confused Molyneux with Kinsella. Apologies all. Middle of the night mistake. Very sorry. Dammit. Very sorry all.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-18 12:28:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54523191_10157056577417264_917272570

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54523191_10157056577417264_9172725709485899776_n_10157056577412264.jpg (ACADEMIC) LIBERTARIANS WON”T DEBATE MEArby HydeI’d still like to see a debate between you and hoppeMar 18, 2019, 7:50 PMCurt Doolittleso would IMar 18, 2019, 7:52 PMCurt Doolittleit would end badly for him as a debate. i would rather discuss how three of us solved social science in three generations.Mar 18, 2019, 7:53 PMMichael PattinsonWe can affirm ” No one will debate Ghengis Khan” ;)Mar 19, 2019, 4:36 AMSteven Logan Everett-FainLibertarians don’t really have an angle to debate from. Their ideology is summed up as ‘leave me alone but let me continue to benefit from society’.

    They are the conservative equivalent of young, wealthy trust fund, gated community communists.

    I would be totally fine if they actually practiced what they preached and removed themselves from society entirely. Effectively a lot of them advocate for their own ex communication.

    That’s my take anyway.Mar 19, 2019, 8:08 AM(ACADEMIC) LIBERTARIANS WON”T DEBATE ME


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-18 10:55:00 UTC

  • Did you just try to make an argument? Oh. Ok. Didn’t think so

    Did you just try to make an argument? Oh. Ok. Didn’t think so.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-18 07:38:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1107546925631524864

    Reply addressees: @arrus_kacchi

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1107544931785072641


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1107544931785072641

  • “…Then they fight you. Then you win.”

    —“…Then they fight you. Then you win.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-18 05:57:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1107521308873641984

  • 2019-03-18

    https://t.co/warCkDcZvp


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-18 05:45:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1107518246012493824

  • You want to throw down that Gauntlet? I don’t swing at you, or Bob for that matt

    You want to throw down that Gauntlet? I don’t swing at you, or Bob for that matter, but if you want me to start with you, I”m happy to. Open for a debate at any time. But be careful. You won’t recover from it. I solved what you didn’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-18 05:15:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1107510759129522176

    Reply addressees: @NSKinsella @NationalAnarchy @BobMurphyEcon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1107504471356125185


    IN REPLY TO:

    @NSKinsella

    @NationalAnarchy @curtdoolittle @BobMurphyEcon Getting upset at Bob’s pacifism–which is not representative of libertarianism anyway–is a thin excuse for adhering to Doolittle’s half-baked, incoherent, and unlibertarian “Propertarian” nonsense.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1107504471356125185

  • “…Then they fight you. Then you win.”

    —“…Then they fight you. Then you win.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-18 01:56:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54210531_10157055925477264_491406789

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54210531_10157055925477264_4914067899502559232_n_10157055925472264.jpg Stephen Thomas<—— Looks familiarMar 18, 2019, 1:45 AMThomas CoffeyCurt, have you seen this yet?Mar 19, 2019, 1:06 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-18 01:43:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54425449_10157055895237264_319932843

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54425449_10157055895237264_3199328431644868608_o_10157055895227264.jpg OPEN SEASON.Corey HarmsHANG EM UP AND BLEED EM OUT!Mar 18, 2019, 1:17 AMHoward Van Der KlauwBlocked yet?Mar 18, 2019, 1:18 AMCurt DoolittleJohn MarkMar 18, 2019, 1:28 AMSolomon VolodymyrWant to see it happenMar 18, 2019, 1:28 AMPhilip SaundersStephan Kinsella keeps stating things are “not libertarian” as if this is an argument.Mar 18, 2019, 1:29 AMJames PortocarreroMar 18, 2019, 1:31 AMPhilip SaundersYikes.Mar 18, 2019, 1:33 AMCurt Doolittle(((ethics)))Mar 18, 2019, 1:34 AMPhilip SaundersLow trust afMar 18, 2019, 1:36 AMVince Reefuck that guys a piece of shitMar 18, 2019, 1:40 AMConnor SumnersLol I love this. I may have to make a portrait in this theme of Curt now.Mar 18, 2019, 1:41 AMJosef KalininI’ve always found Libertarian individualism to be a grotesque rebranding of hedonistic egoism and an immensely hateable rationalistic reductionism. It’s easy to ignore the problems of society when you define the individual and his direct self-interest as the highest category of importance and explain literally the entirety of human dynamics according to the egoistic paradigm. They don’t care about issues like racial suicide and demographic replacement because the entire concept of an ethnic identity is too collectivist for them and they would happily see the world blend together into mystery meat under some utopian view of a world of individuals without nations, cultures, or otherwise “collectivist” blankets defining them.

    TLDR, libertarians are sellouts, and deserve 9mm hollow point inside the backs of their skulls.Mar 18, 2019, 1:43 AMSaber LambertHes a fucking lawyer what did you expect hahaMar 18, 2019, 1:43 AMFelix RyanGarbage rothbardian ethics.Mar 18, 2019, 1:45 AMJosef KalininThe fucking constitution itself is anti-libertarian because it’s not a private document.Mar 18, 2019, 1:45 AMFelix RyanJosef Kalinin nice.Mar 18, 2019, 1:45 AMCurt DoolittleJosef Kalinin Shit. That made me laugh hard… lolMar 18, 2019, 1:46 AMFelix RyanI can hear the hand rubbing when he tweets that.Mar 18, 2019, 1:46 AMRyan WilliamsTear him to bits and shit on the remains. His ghetto pilpul libertarian freeriding must die.Mar 18, 2019, 1:54 AMM Shawn DavisMuh philosophical purityMar 18, 2019, 1:55 AMAdam DavidI used to call myself a libertarian.

    The special mystery meat blanderup was the fundamental hangup i had which lead me to search out a better way.

    Lets expose them to P law before putting them against the metaphorical wall.Mar 18, 2019, 2:17 AMJohn EdwardThey violated the rights of the people who worked hard to get degrees from those schools without cheating/bribing. You reduce the value of the good (diploma) by issuing counterfeits.Mar 18, 2019, 2:46 AMMichael D HaasWhat an idiotMar 18, 2019, 3:45 AMPaddy LynchCurt’s giant dick busts more hips than old age and car accidents combinedMar 18, 2019, 3:55 AMPhill KnyspelThe sophist takes on Doolittle . Round 1 ding ding hahaMar 18, 2019, 4:17 AMJaromír MiškovskýOk Ideology with with such strong dictionary that it can be translated to call computer porgram. Vs. project where dig accros multiple sources. Hmm….Mar 18, 2019, 4:26 AMSolomon VolodymyrI used to be L before I realised that utopian state of non-coercion can’t exist for most peoples. That’s where P comes in.Mar 18, 2019, 5:16 AMMathuin HillgarthStephanie who???Mar 18, 2019, 5:17 AMMathuin HillgarthGotta love autocorrect to aid in an insultMar 18, 2019, 5:17 AMSolomon VolodymyrIt’s our insurance, guaranteeing liberty by seizing sovereignty; removing parasitism by promising reciprocity.Mar 18, 2019, 5:17 AMMicah PezdirtzAnyone calling P nonsense just demonstrates to me the state of their denial.Mar 18, 2019, 6:10 AMEric BestPhilip Saunders his rhetoric is very “religious.”Mar 18, 2019, 6:59 AMHans JohanssonModern libertarianism has essentially turned into corporate neoliberalism.Mar 18, 2019, 7:13 AMEly HarmanBuying your way into college is a lot less stupid and destructive than affirmative action. At least the money benefits the merit based admissions and compensates them for putting up with fuckwit heirs. And if people make something of THEIR lives, I don’t see the harm in giving their children a shot.Mar 18, 2019, 9:04 AMMoritz BierlingIt would be ok if they openly said that you can buy admissionMar 18, 2019, 9:22 AMCurt DoolittleMoritz Bierling correctMar 18, 2019, 10:38 AMJoseph RossI agree with you Curt. Even if I thought you were wrong I wouldn’t side with Kinsella because he had a blue check mark he doesn’t deserve.Mar 18, 2019, 9:26 PMJoseph RossKinsella is someone who just needs to be laughed at. He literally said it’s not a NAP violation to steal bitcoins because there’s no contract involved since it’s decentralized. According to him, since it isn’t a NAP violation there’s no recourse against someone who steals them.Mar 18, 2019, 9:28 PMJimmy KnowlesHe goes over the wallMar 18, 2019, 9:29 PMMichael PattinsonAll this years with HHH and still winging like a little girl.LolMar 19, 2019, 2:50 AMVince Reeoy vey all this antisemetic dog whistlingMar 19, 2019, 2:55 AMJC TrottStealing a seat at a college is “Libertarian”?

    Doesn’t that offend the NAP?Mar 19, 2019, 6:15 AMPhilip SaundersJC Trott the point is that it’s done under the table, rather than openly (which would be fine). There is a false pretence of a purely meritocratic game.

    Also, it has potential to counterfeit the value of the qualification.Mar 19, 2019, 6:21 AMCréachán Ó NáraighPlease take down his intellectual communism in the most public and conclusive manner. It’s already been done but it needs to be done again for a new audience. Example:

    https://strangerousthoughts.wordpress.com/2010/11/14/the-economic-principles-of-intellectual-property-and-the-fallacies-of-intellectual-communism/Mar 20, 2019, 12:05 AMDerek YoungFormer libertarian! John Mark has introduced me to Propertarianism! Amazing stuff!Mar 20, 2019, 9:19 AMRichard HeathenMar 22, 2019, 6:32 PMOPEN SEASON.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-18 01:16:00 UTC