Curt Doolittle

Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • (FB 1553464581 Timestamp) “collusion truthers” lol

    (FB 1553464581 Timestamp) “collusion truthers” lol

  • (FB 1553462693 Timestamp) UM. I DON’T JUDGE PEOPLE’S DISCOURSE BY THEIR SEXUAL P

    (FB 1553462693 Timestamp) UM. I DON’T JUDGE PEOPLE’S DISCOURSE BY THEIR SEXUAL PREFERENCE, JUST QUALITY OF ARGUMENT – AND YOU WON’T MAKE ME. SORRY.
    If they don’t make it my issue it’s not an issue for me. And that says nothing about my heterosexuality, and everything about my work and teaching. So don’t try insulting me. I’m immune. (damn. female stalkers are the worst.) (from twitter)

  • (FB 1553447212 Timestamp) WTH. TOO MANY NOOBS. HERE IS HOW ITS DONE

    (FB 1553447212 Timestamp) WTH. TOO MANY NOOBS. HERE IS HOW ITS DONE

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553446662 Timestamp) —“Marcuse’s whole repressive tolerance theory. His goal was to remove stuff so people would forget it ever existed at all.”— Michael D Abbott.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553443464 Timestamp) —“Not sure “continuous recursive disambiguation” really clarifies anything!”—Dennis Spain You probably don’t know how to write software, haven’t read turing, nor chomsky, because that’s what ‘language’ means. Continuous (a stream of sounds), recursive (passing ‘state’ – you might think of this incorrectly as ‘accumulating’), disambiguation (removing error). Just as science is falsificationary, language is falsificationary. Sounds in a stream should result in continuous decreases in ambiguity until the point at which we establish a context, a contract for meaning, and a warranty of due diligence limiting that meaning. Which is what a ‘grammar’ means: Rules of continuous recursive disambiguation. (Turing > Chomsky) + (Weber > Mises > Rothbard > Hoppe) + (Hayek) -> Doolittle

  • (FB 1553442994 Timestamp) by Michael Abbott

    (FB 1553442994 Timestamp) by Michael Abbott

  • (FB 1553462693 Timestamp) UM. I DON’T JUDGE PEOPLE’S DISCOURSE BY THEIR SEXUAL P

    (FB 1553462693 Timestamp) UM. I DON’T JUDGE PEOPLE’S DISCOURSE BY THEIR SEXUAL PREFERENCE, JUST QUALITY OF ARGUMENT – AND YOU WON’T MAKE ME. SORRY.
    If they don’t make it my issue it’s not an issue for me. And that says nothing about my heterosexuality, and everything about my work and teaching. So don’t try insulting me. I’m immune. (damn. female stalkers are the worst.) (from twitter)

  • (FB 1553447212 Timestamp) WTH. TOO MANY NOOBS. HERE IS HOW ITS DONE

    (FB 1553447212 Timestamp) WTH. TOO MANY NOOBS. HERE IS HOW ITS DONE

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553446662 Timestamp) —“Marcuse’s whole repressive tolerance theory. His goal was to remove stuff so people would forget it ever existed at all.”— Michael D Abbott.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553443464 Timestamp) —“Not sure “continuous recursive disambiguation” really clarifies anything!”—Dennis Spain You probably don’t know how to write software, haven’t read turing, nor chomsky, because that’s what ‘language’ means. Continuous (a stream of sounds), recursive (passing ‘state’ – you might think of this incorrectly as ‘accumulating’), disambiguation (removing error). Just as science is falsificationary, language is falsificationary. Sounds in a stream should result in continuous decreases in ambiguity until the point at which we establish a context, a contract for meaning, and a warranty of due diligence limiting that meaning. Which is what a ‘grammar’ means: Rules of continuous recursive disambiguation. (Turing > Chomsky) + (Weber > Mises > Rothbard > Hoppe) + (Hayek) -> Doolittle