Curt Doolittle

Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550931976 Timestamp) I mean, once I have your number, and I let the goyim know, all you can do is feed the bigger fish that’s eating you.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550953643 Timestamp) (Today in absurd video. Russian cops making some woman do nipple prints in addition to finger prints. Seriously. You just can’t make this stuff up.)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551029777 Timestamp) COURSE UPDATE —“Hello Curt, I’d like to check in with you as to when the courses start on Propertarianism.com. Is LAW103 (The Method: The Core) the first one that’ll be held? Do I understand correctly that it will start on this Monday the 25th? I think you posted that on FB at some point. Just wondering what I should do next. Thanks”— The course LAW103 will start this week, and I will dribble out the content as we go. (Dribble is the technical term in the software, which i find kind of ‘humorous’. ) A course consists of Lessons, which consist of Topics. A topic consists of one or more videos, and an assignment. WHEN TO JOIN: Maybe wait until I get a few topics or lessons out (a week or two) then sign up and catch up on those lessons. (They are quite a bit of work.) This will also ensure i don’t get overwhelmed learning how to run the course myself. (although given the high quality of responses I think it’ll be easier than I thought.) DATE: I’m running behind because the ‘hit pieces’ made me burn two weeks on their nonsense. So I’m still producing the content. ANNOUNCING: I’ll announce on the FB feed when I think more people should join up without missing out, and ‘notify’ everyone via the application (institute site) email. So. Assuming you’ve Applied (completed Course APPLY01), and if we have approved your application. you can fork over your cash in a week or two. It’s more ‘enjoyable’ to progress along with everyone else. But it’s not required. It’s not like a classroom. We need each other to do the work, but we don’t have to all work at the same speed. OK? Hugs. Thanks for asking.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551021897 Timestamp) CULT (Religion) VERSUS CULT-LIKE (devotion) Curt Doolittle: Well. I mean, you’re saying I’m a cult leader and the work is religious. I am saying I would like to see if it is possible to produce the equivalent of a cult – but of the law. To some degree the law already is a secular priesthood. So in essence I am agreeing with you – by analogy. Heather Joi: [GSRM DELETED] So what you’re saying is….. … that you acknowledge that you are: (in your own words) “searching for a religion of the law” “produce the equivalent of a cult – but of the law.” ”a secular priesthood.” Curt Doolittle: Well, I’ll just say that you forced me to look at the question from your perspective, and from your perspective, I agreed. What I’d assumed you’d meant was that the law was nonsense, and that I am positioning myself as some sort of leader rather than a teacher of leaders who will be the antithesis of the frankfurt school’s defeat of our people. (So if you call the frankfurt school a cult then we are talking the same language. if not then we are not.) But you are right, I am trying to to build a law, and if possible develop a secular occupation of ‘cult like devotion’, wherein the law is sacred (inviolable regardless of self interest.) I think I am pretty clear that I”m trying to separately find a way to convert our set of religions back to something european rather than semitic, and that’s the ‘cult’ (religion) I am looking to produce. So if you think I’m being dishonest, I’m just looking for the truth and your general argument helped me do so. And as I have defined it I don’t disagree. Cult (reform our religion) vs Cult-like (Sacredness of the law). ANd I agree with both. I just don’t CONFLATE THEM in order to lie. So in this sense yes I want to produce a cult (religion without priests) and cult like occupation (secular priesthood of the law). (And yes I do understand that you tried to engage in CONFLATION(AMBIGUATION) and that I (as usual) engaged in DEFLATION(DISAMBIGUATION).) In other words, you were lying. But within that lie was enough truth that I agree with the truth content. One is not guilty by word-association. Sorry.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551021897 Timestamp) CULT (Religion) VERSUS CULT-LIKE (devotion) Curt Doolittle: Well. I mean, you’re saying I’m a cult leader and the work is religious. I am saying I would like to see if it is possible to produce the equivalent of a cult – but of the law. To some degree the law already is a secular priesthood. So in essence I am agreeing with you – by analogy. Heather Joi: [GSRM DELETED] So what you’re saying is….. … that you acknowledge that you are: (in your own words) “searching for a religion of the law” “produce the equivalent of a cult – but of the law.” ”a secular priesthood.” Curt Doolittle: Well, I’ll just say that you forced me to look at the question from your perspective, and from your perspective, I agreed. What I’d assumed you’d meant was that the law was nonsense, and that I am positioning myself as some sort of leader rather than a teacher of leaders who will be the antithesis of the frankfurt school’s defeat of our people. (So if you call the frankfurt school a cult then we are talking the same language. if not then we are not.) But you are right, I am trying to to build a law, and if possible develop a secular occupation of ‘cult like devotion’, wherein the law is sacred (inviolable regardless of self interest.) I think I am pretty clear that I”m trying to separately find a way to convert our set of religions back to something european rather than semitic, and that’s the ‘cult’ (religion) I am looking to produce. So if you think I’m being dishonest, I’m just looking for the truth and your general argument helped me do so. And as I have defined it I don’t disagree. Cult (reform our religion) vs Cult-like (Sacredness of the law). ANd I agree with both. I just don’t CONFLATE THEM in order to lie. So in this sense yes I want to produce a cult (religion without priests) and cult like occupation (secular priesthood of the law). (And yes I do understand that you tried to engage in CONFLATION(AMBIGUATION) and that I (as usual) engaged in DEFLATION(DISAMBIGUATION).) In other words, you were lying. But within that lie was enough truth that I agree with the truth content. One is not guilty by word-association. Sorry.

  • (FB 1551105567 Timestamp) CULT!!!!!!!! CULT!!!! lolz (Veritas et Violentia)

    (FB 1551105567 Timestamp) CULT!!!!!!!! CULT!!!! lolz (Veritas et Violentia)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551102851 Timestamp) Note “boomer” is a filtered word in my feed. You see your comment. No one else does. —“Why though?”–Spencer Randolph It’s a non-argument, usually used against me, when in fact, I am a member of the Jones generation (between boomers and Gen X) like Gates, Ellison, and Jobs, and I don’t share ANY values with the boomers. I want to end them. And make them pay. Jones generation is star wars/indiana jones/blade runner/alien Neuromancer/Snow Crash, first home computers, first video game consoles, and the founders of the tech boom. —“Fair enough. How would you describe the epidemic of political ineptitude displayed in large part by the particular aforementioned and verboten generation?”—Spencer Randolph I don’t disagree with criticisms of boomers. I disagree that I”m a boomer. Demographers classify generations by population cycles. Social Scientists classify generations by shared experience and values. I hated those ‘boomer’ fkers and I still do.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551038984 Timestamp) SEE? One thing that studying Curt Doolittle, but ESPECIALLY Bill Joslin is that the more I try to think along and concentrate along with you as I digest your work—- I find myself becoming BOTH a LOT more open to all sorts of people, but also a HELLUVA lot more unforgiving of bad people.”—Nick Dahlheim

  • (FB 1551105567 Timestamp) CULT!!!!!!!! CULT!!!! lolz (Veritas et Violentia)

    (FB 1551105567 Timestamp) CULT!!!!!!!! CULT!!!! lolz (Veritas et Violentia)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551102851 Timestamp) Note “boomer” is a filtered word in my feed. You see your comment. No one else does. —“Why though?”–Spencer Randolph It’s a non-argument, usually used against me, when in fact, I am a member of the Jones generation (between boomers and Gen X) like Gates, Ellison, and Jobs, and I don’t share ANY values with the boomers. I want to end them. And make them pay. Jones generation is star wars/indiana jones/blade runner/alien Neuromancer/Snow Crash, first home computers, first video game consoles, and the founders of the tech boom. —“Fair enough. How would you describe the epidemic of political ineptitude displayed in large part by the particular aforementioned and verboten generation?”—Spencer Randolph I don’t disagree with criticisms of boomers. I disagree that I”m a boomer. Demographers classify generations by population cycles. Social Scientists classify generations by shared experience and values. I hated those ‘boomer’ fkers and I still do.