Curt Doolittle

Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550500424 Timestamp) Brudlefly; @Brundlefly14 https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQ3ZLEjzIQ6FHpibrZjon6A In retrospect I talked over Doovid who was trying to make a point about reciprocity, because my intuition was that he was going in the wrong direction and I didn’t want to have to correct him. This was a mistake. There was value in the search for his undrestanding of reciprocity. Battle between keeping the conversation from getting off point, or going into ratholes, and divining people’s intent. Apologies to Doovid.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550494818 Timestamp) —“isn’t criticism a good thing though?”— Aaron Long Of course. and wanted. and necessary. And it’s why I start ‘king of the hill’ battles constantly – to get criticism on the one hand and educate on the other. The difference is – this particular ‘king’ doesn’t want to win. He wants to create an army of winners.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550502155 Timestamp) LET ME HELP YOU: YOU HAVE FAILED. A CHRISTIAN GSRRM EXAMPLE You didn’t make an argument. right? There is faith and there is reason, and faith exists to give a discount on reason. It’s not complicated. If your generation and your class are still dependent upon faith enough that my work isn’t valuable then that is not uncommon in history. and future generations will have the ability to choose. But data is in my favor. The religious are now the same percentage as the atheists. And as always we see movement to the extremes. Either atheist or evangelical with all other churches collapsing. Because in modernity we have the luxury of pursuing our cognitive preferences. Because there is no longer a need for ‘compromise communities’. Now,lets look at your abrahamic lies to show you how you are a liar, traied by liars, to lie, and why you fail: —“People make those arguments all the time, curt.”— Which tells us nothing about their truth or falsehood. —“Your narcissism prevents you from seeing them, much less reflecting upon your ideas.”— Either my ideas are true or false. They have nothing to do with my personality, or my psychology. gravity is gravity even if a madman proclaims it. Reciprocity is reciprocity even if psychopaths proclaims it. The source of a statement has no bearing on it’s truth. —“There is no sense in arguing with a man who has to be right at all costs. “—- You mean there is no sense arguing faith and psychic benefit against someone who seeks the truth, and will not compromise to make the faithful happy. In other words you are shaming like a woman assuming her affections are wanted. I want the ability for our people to engage in political divorces not your approval or demand for compliance with your trivial emotions. —“Enjoy your fb following of fellow spergnerds arguing about faith and falling in to irrelevancy because the vast majority of people are turned off by not only your ideas, but how you communicate them. “— Except that over time that’s not what happens, right? we keep growing. We keep growing because truth, the utility of truth, the policies possible under truth, will save our people, and are the only plan our people have. I dont expect you to like me or my ideas. I expect you to follow your self interest and survive – or not, and to die off. Because you have a record of increasing rates of failure in competition with judaism-islamism. YOu fear aristotle like church fathers yet it is aristotle that saved europe not only from islam but from christianity. —“You are doing nobody any favors.”– I am disciplining wayward children so that they can survive in a world hostile to naivety. —“I look forward to seeing the comments about how I was too low IQ to get it lol.”— I haven’t noticed that you’re too dim whatsoever. I’ve noticed that you are using the female argument of disapproval, shaming, ridicule, and rallying in order to defend your addiction and lack of agency. The right answer is. We must win. I will keep my faith. But we must win for me to keep it.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550500424 Timestamp) Brudlefly; @Brundlefly14 https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQ3ZLEjzIQ6FHpibrZjon6A In retrospect I talked over Doovid who was trying to make a point about reciprocity, because my intuition was that he was going in the wrong direction and I didn’t want to have to correct him. This was a mistake. There was value in the search for his undrestanding of reciprocity. Battle between keeping the conversation from getting off point, or going into ratholes, and divining people’s intent. Apologies to Doovid.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550537192 Timestamp) Bill Joslin, can you please help me with the questions in “>>>” below???

    By Bill Joslin Curt’s counter signalling Abrahamic faith serves one purpose – to demonstrate via the reactions of the faithful, their desire to maintain a political monopoly via religion while also forcing the distinction of political religion from natural religion. Further to that: Truth or “knowing” in a religious or mystical sense has a specific definition: an experience which has the following qualities. 1) intensity – a strongly moving experience which results in altered behavior 2) centrality in which the person undergoing the experience obtains a central position (not a spectator) 3) directness in that the experience was not intermediary and was intended towards them personally – a direct relationship between the person and God . Okay – that’s fine. But only if this remains in the domain of personal knowing. Crossing this into the political or public domain becomes an issue. That’s to say, claiming political clout based on religious experience becomes problematic. It becomes problematic because by the above definition a means to distinguish charlatan from prophet remains impossible (it’s undecidable) So the issue most have with Curt’s stand on religion pertains to: 1) conflating definitions of knowledge then attacking one form based on the criteria of the other (equivocation).

    I don’t use knowledge but I can see how you might think so. I use experience open to testimony in operational language.

    2) presuming how truth relates to interpersonal transactions where costs and damages are possible must be reified into some universal (big “T’) truth. In other words taking the political and legal function of truth out of context into universal presumptions

    I think I only make the claim about the commons and commercial, financial, economic, legal, political, and pedagogical (academic) speech upon which others depend for truthful content. I think many dogmas can be restated in language that satisfies the criteria of truthful speech.

    3) confuse constraints upon establishing monopolies writ large as justifications for religious persecution

    I don’t understand this one?????

    This last one is interesting because it reveals the underlying presumption and intention of political religions – the desire for and feeling of entitlement to a monopoly on: political power, truth, reality, faith, belief. Oddly, it’s not the propertarians who can’t live productively with Abrahamic faiths (political religions) but rather the other way around (monopolies are a bitch)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550536780 Timestamp) Sorry, but my experience with Cantwell was awesome and I gotta be an advocate of anyone who can talk with me like that. I don’t have any history but I don’t understand the criticism.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550537192 Timestamp) Bill Joslin, can you please help me with the questions in “>>>” below???

    By Bill Joslin Curt’s counter signalling Abrahamic faith serves one purpose – to demonstrate via the reactions of the faithful, their desire to maintain a political monopoly via religion while also forcing the distinction of political religion from natural religion. Further to that: Truth or “knowing” in a religious or mystical sense has a specific definition: an experience which has the following qualities. 1) intensity – a strongly moving experience which results in altered behavior 2) centrality in which the person undergoing the experience obtains a central position (not a spectator) 3) directness in that the experience was not intermediary and was intended towards them personally – a direct relationship between the person and God . Okay – that’s fine. But only if this remains in the domain of personal knowing. Crossing this into the political or public domain becomes an issue. That’s to say, claiming political clout based on religious experience becomes problematic. It becomes problematic because by the above definition a means to distinguish charlatan from prophet remains impossible (it’s undecidable) So the issue most have with Curt’s stand on religion pertains to: 1) conflating definitions of knowledge then attacking one form based on the criteria of the other (equivocation).

    I don’t use knowledge but I can see how you might think so. I use experience open to testimony in operational language.

    2) presuming how truth relates to interpersonal transactions where costs and damages are possible must be reified into some universal (big “T’) truth. In other words taking the political and legal function of truth out of context into universal presumptions

    I think I only make the claim about the commons and commercial, financial, economic, legal, political, and pedagogical (academic) speech upon which others depend for truthful content. I think many dogmas can be restated in language that satisfies the criteria of truthful speech.

    3) confuse constraints upon establishing monopolies writ large as justifications for religious persecution

    I don’t understand this one?????

    This last one is interesting because it reveals the underlying presumption and intention of political religions – the desire for and feeling of entitlement to a monopoly on: political power, truth, reality, faith, belief. Oddly, it’s not the propertarians who can’t live productively with Abrahamic faiths (political religions) but rather the other way around (monopolies are a bitch)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550536780 Timestamp) Sorry, but my experience with Cantwell was awesome and I gotta be an advocate of anyone who can talk with me like that. I don’t have any history but I don’t understand the criticism.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550669784 Timestamp) White boys like Kinsella trying to gossip rally and shame like women and jews without the creativity is so boring – it’s like bad comedians, or grad-schoolers doing shakespeare. Tolerable for the parents only. Embarrassing for everyone else. 😉

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550599537 Timestamp) Kinsella still gossips,shames, and rallies like a girl. lolz.