Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

(FB 1549120723 Timestamp) UNDERSTANDING OF USE VS CONSTRUCTION The general public need only understand policy and benefits. —“That attitude tells me all I need know about your organization.”—Mark Wright What??? The general public needs to understand How to write strictly constructed law? And deflation, disambiguation and serialization, operational semantics and grammar, transactionally expanded sentences, dimensions of testing available to the human mind, the means of warrantying due diligence in both in and across those dimensions? falsificationism vs justificationism? The difference between ontological, axiomatic, and theoretic systems? Why does the public need to understand that? They can’t. The general public doesn’t study formal logic, advanced mathematics, political, institutional, financial or micro economics, the law, engineering, physics, or cognitive science. they use the products of those who do. “For sovereignty, liberty and freedom to exist, the Law must consist of very simple rules.” And there is only one sentence the public needs to understand: “Natural Law, the rights of anglo saxons, the Adams-Jefferson constitution, and western civilization’s success in the ancient, modern, and future worlds, depended and depends upon the continuous production of velocity by the continuous production of agency by the continuous use of sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, law and jury, and markets in association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and group strategy, at the cost of minimizing the rates of reproduction of those unable to contribute to those demands.” They need to understand we can de financialize, de politicize, restore truthful speech in commerce, finance, economics, law, politics, and group evolutionary strategy; restore the civic society and . They need to understand the rights and obligations in the policies that produce those ends. To follow a simple law does not require that men understand its underlying science. If so it would be useless. We must not understand how to build any given set of tools, only once built, how to use them within our sphere of agency. Do not assume I am a fool.

(FB 1549120723 Timestamp) UNDERSTANDING OF USE VS CONSTRUCTION The general public need only understand policy and benefits. —“That attitude tells me all I need know about your organization.”—Mark Wright What??? The general public needs to understand How to write strictly constructed law? And deflation, disambiguation and serialization, operational semantics and grammar, transactionally expanded sentences, dimensions of testing available to the human mind, the means of warrantying due diligence in both in and across those dimensions? falsificationism vs justificationism? The difference between ontological, axiomatic, and theoretic systems? Why does the public need to understand that? They can’t. The general public doesn’t study formal logic, advanced mathematics, political, institutional, financial or micro economics, the law, engineering, physics, or cognitive science. they use the products of those who do. “For sovereignty, liberty and freedom to exist, the Law must consist of very simple rules.” And there is only one sentence the public needs to understand: “Natural Law, the rights of anglo saxons, the Adams-Jefferson constitution, and western civilization’s success in the ancient, modern, and future worlds, depended and depends upon the continuous production of velocity by the continuous production of agency by the continuous use of sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, law and jury, and markets in association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, and group strategy, at the cost of minimizing the rates of reproduction of those unable to contribute to those demands.” They need to understand we can de financialize, de politicize, restore truthful speech in commerce, finance, economics, law, politics, and group evolutionary strategy; restore the civic society and . They need to understand the rights and obligations in the policies that produce those ends. To follow a simple law does not require that men understand its underlying science. If so it would be useless. We must not understand how to build any given set of tools, only once built, how to use them within our sphere of agency. Do not assume I am a fool.