(FB 1545228102 Timestamp) ( I have the benefit of looking back at thinkers in history through the lens not only of science, but of propertarianism, and from that position on the shoulders of giants that came before me, plus my little step stool, the whole of it fits together in rather obvious puzzle pieces. Like all improvements in calculation from language through math, through reason, through science, through propertarianism (natural law), everything is much simpler once we have a grammar to understand it with. )
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545309375 Timestamp) Able? Able? You’re an addict acting like a clown spewing abrahamic critique in the competitive method of females because you can’t put forth an argument other than normative, justificationary, or ridicule. Abrahamism: false promise, baiting into moral hazard, advanced by “Pilpul” consisting of the heaping of undue praise, sophism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience, and defended by “Critique”, consisting of disapproval, moralizing, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, and reputation destruction – thereby advancing a falsehood on one hand, and attacking the person rather than argument on the other. What I do, is teach how to identify and defeat these arguments. What you don’t know is that Truth under threat of violence is the competitive strategy of males, and conformity under threat of reputation destruction the competitive strategy of females. Nor do you realize you are making TEXTBOOK ARGUMENTS using every one of the female techniques. The problem is, someone has to care about your approval, when you’re conducting your Pilpul and Critique in a forum of men for whom truth is far more important than approval, and who are training specifically to end the Abrahamic Deceits in their modern form: Marxism, Boasianism, Freudianism, Keynesianism (pseudoscience), Postmodernism and Libertarianism (sophism), and Feminism (false promise, denial). Truth is what differentiates the west from the rest. We survived christianity and the dark ages thanks to our sovereignty, heroism, truth, duty, and law, with the restoration of martial behavior under the viking conquest, and the restoration of greek thought, the replacement of the church’s mandated ignorance and superstition with literacy, and british contractualism and legalism, combined with greek thought, restoring our empiricism. All of these resulted in the agrarian revolution, world conquest, industrialization, and the creation of the modern world that has dragged the entire world out of semitic ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, tyranny, and the vicissitudes of nature. You’re just another drug user, defending his ‘high’, by reaching for any excuse you can find, like a woman defending her reputation despite sleeping with the enemy for money. We ought to shave your head and make you wear a dress. TRUTH IS TRUTH AND TRUTH IS ENOUGH. Satisfaction of demand for Religion(membership in the pack or herd) can be produced by Education(Stoicism), Therapy(buddhism), or Medication(Abrahamism). Cheers.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545309375 Timestamp) Able? Able? You’re an addict acting like a clown spewing abrahamic critique in the competitive method of females because you can’t put forth an argument other than normative, justificationary, or ridicule. Abrahamism: false promise, baiting into moral hazard, advanced by “Pilpul” consisting of the heaping of undue praise, sophism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience, and defended by “Critique”, consisting of disapproval, moralizing, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, and reputation destruction – thereby advancing a falsehood on one hand, and attacking the person rather than argument on the other. What I do, is teach how to identify and defeat these arguments. What you don’t know is that Truth under threat of violence is the competitive strategy of males, and conformity under threat of reputation destruction the competitive strategy of females. Nor do you realize you are making TEXTBOOK ARGUMENTS using every one of the female techniques. The problem is, someone has to care about your approval, when you’re conducting your Pilpul and Critique in a forum of men for whom truth is far more important than approval, and who are training specifically to end the Abrahamic Deceits in their modern form: Marxism, Boasianism, Freudianism, Keynesianism (pseudoscience), Postmodernism and Libertarianism (sophism), and Feminism (false promise, denial). Truth is what differentiates the west from the rest. We survived christianity and the dark ages thanks to our sovereignty, heroism, truth, duty, and law, with the restoration of martial behavior under the viking conquest, and the restoration of greek thought, the replacement of the church’s mandated ignorance and superstition with literacy, and british contractualism and legalism, combined with greek thought, restoring our empiricism. All of these resulted in the agrarian revolution, world conquest, industrialization, and the creation of the modern world that has dragged the entire world out of semitic ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, tyranny, and the vicissitudes of nature. You’re just another drug user, defending his ‘high’, by reaching for any excuse you can find, like a woman defending her reputation despite sleeping with the enemy for money. We ought to shave your head and make you wear a dress. TRUTH IS TRUTH AND TRUTH IS ENOUGH. Satisfaction of demand for Religion(membership in the pack or herd) can be produced by Education(Stoicism), Therapy(buddhism), or Medication(Abrahamism). Cheers.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545407885 Timestamp) “GETTING IT- IT’S MOSTLY THE GRAMMARS” by A Friend. Hey! I thought about what made it ‘click’ for me. Here’s the result: “Let me try to identify things that would have made it faster: 1) Vocabulary. That would have been the biggest barrier to entry for me. What is fictionalism? What is operationalism? Largely graspable. Once this is clear I donât see anything blocking the understand of the grammars. 2) I should have focused less on your facebook posts (until I got the grammars). I think I should have went straight to the website and find the Core of propertarianism. I avoided the core too much. Iâm high on openness so the posts are pretty cool because there is so much to unpack and to learn from, and I could just dive inside. Itâs nice to have something to grapple my mind with that can last longer that a few weeks. 3) Writing about it and isolating the core earlier (I think going to the overview that Eli Harman put out helped). So I started to say âI need to identify the Core and write about the definitions of the concepts in the core to really appropriate them as my ownâ. To do that I isolated mainly testimonialism and the tests of consistency. 4) I saw a post on the website about natural law and stating basically how you should talk and the vocabulary to use. That subject was didn’t take me very long by comparison. To summarize, it would have been way faster for me to say: Here are the key concepts (fictionalism, operationalism, testimonialism, the tests of consistency). Here are the definitions of this terms. Here is what you can do with it. Here is how you can do it (the grammars). Go in the world and use it. I couldnât understand it when you said, “it is taking so long to look through everything again”. Now, Iâm like âOoooooh shit. Okay. I get it. I get how big this project is if you need to look at everything. Damn. Good job man.â Now I also understand that you use this Grammar and Vocabulary, and then you test what results they produce on facebook. You experiment with them on facebook. BIG LESSON I think if I would have understand how important are the grammars, I would have gone straight for it until I got it. Then it is a matter of investing the time to apply it.” (CD: edited for clarity)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545397804 Timestamp) MORE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVIST FRAUD —“It does not claim that “reality” is socially constructed, that would be ridiculous. It claims that the means by which we conceive of reality is socially constructed, which seems pretty obvious really.”—- Twitterite This is an artful conflation of terms of ‘reality’ (action), and ‘model’. Evidence is very clear that people distinguish between reality and model. The violence in video games being the most current example, or the greco roman distinction between religious myth and reality. So even the the phrase ‘reality is socially constructed’ is an attempted fraud. The model we use to determine action in reality is and must be produced as a market good like any other, and is limited to the supply and demand of that market – like any other. However… …. the narratives and VALUES we use to NEGOTIATE actions in reality are constructed within that market given the references and referents available. In other words, WE SOCIALLY CONSTRUCT LIES, we SCIENTIFICALLY DISCOVER TRUTHS. And those that work by truth compete best. What surprises me is that it’s not obvious that there is a difference between reality and action and cost and imagination and speech, and not bearing a cost – and that those of us who have achieved in life in the markets for force and commerce, and those who achieve in life … … in the market for fraud, are readily distinguished by whether we use the languages of truth, science, economics, and law, or the language of utility, theology, philosophy, and morality. The fact that you (anyone who subscribes to neo-abrahamism) are speaking about the pseudoscientific origins of such a thing,rather than the GOALS TO ACHIEVE WITH IT, is merely another alt-right nerd-variation on memes. Yeah. Meme’s are fun. Yeah. Sophism is fun. Yes you’re witty. But in the end you’re just poisoning the same well we eventually drink from. Words and priests are cheap, unwarrantied, and without cost. artists, soldiers, craftsmen, engineers, lawyers, accountants, executives, and financiers ACT to produce an end for which they pay the cost. Social construction refers to our ability to create narratives like priests do that cost us nothing, but force costs on the people, by the process of creating moral hazard, by the process of diversion from truth. period. You aren’t philosophers or scientists, but sophists using the ancient technique of deceit by priests with the pretension of special knowledge that doesn’t exist,to fool by complex language and suggestion those who are suckers -and the first sucker is always the man in the mirror.
-
(FB 1545341478 Timestamp) TODAY’S VENTURE INTO CLOWN WORLD
(FB 1545341478 Timestamp) TODAY’S VENTURE INTO CLOWN WORLD
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545407885 Timestamp) “GETTING IT- IT’S MOSTLY THE GRAMMARS” by A Friend. Hey! I thought about what made it ‘click’ for me. Here’s the result: “Let me try to identify things that would have made it faster: 1) Vocabulary. That would have been the biggest barrier to entry for me. What is fictionalism? What is operationalism? Largely graspable. Once this is clear I donât see anything blocking the understand of the grammars. 2) I should have focused less on your facebook posts (until I got the grammars). I think I should have went straight to the website and find the Core of propertarianism. I avoided the core too much. Iâm high on openness so the posts are pretty cool because there is so much to unpack and to learn from, and I could just dive inside. Itâs nice to have something to grapple my mind with that can last longer that a few weeks. 3) Writing about it and isolating the core earlier (I think going to the overview that Eli Harman put out helped). So I started to say âI need to identify the Core and write about the definitions of the concepts in the core to really appropriate them as my ownâ. To do that I isolated mainly testimonialism and the tests of consistency. 4) I saw a post on the website about natural law and stating basically how you should talk and the vocabulary to use. That subject was didn’t take me very long by comparison. To summarize, it would have been way faster for me to say: Here are the key concepts (fictionalism, operationalism, testimonialism, the tests of consistency). Here are the definitions of this terms. Here is what you can do with it. Here is how you can do it (the grammars). Go in the world and use it. I couldnât understand it when you said, “it is taking so long to look through everything again”. Now, Iâm like âOoooooh shit. Okay. I get it. I get how big this project is if you need to look at everything. Damn. Good job man.â Now I also understand that you use this Grammar and Vocabulary, and then you test what results they produce on facebook. You experiment with them on facebook. BIG LESSON I think if I would have understand how important are the grammars, I would have gone straight for it until I got it. Then it is a matter of investing the time to apply it.” (CD: edited for clarity)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545321894 Timestamp) ORGANIZED TRUTH SUPPRESSION HERE ON FB It appears that Andrew Taylor (who I don’t know) and Claire Khaw – an asian-brit, of questionable mental ability and unquestionable mental instability, who is an apologist for authoritarian religion – particularly islam – are attempting to get me (us) shadow banned by inviting muslim fanatics to our pages, and creating multiple sock accounts, and then having them report us. This is why we are so careful with filtering friend requests and follows. We had the same problem with another woman who shall remain nameless. Anyway, that’s why some of you are seeing shadow ban activity. I don’t quite have my arms around the FB algorithm yet but it does seem to require numbers.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545397804 Timestamp) MORE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVIST FRAUD —“It does not claim that “reality” is socially constructed, that would be ridiculous. It claims that the means by which we conceive of reality is socially constructed, which seems pretty obvious really.”—- Twitterite This is an artful conflation of terms of ‘reality’ (action), and ‘model’. Evidence is very clear that people distinguish between reality and model. The violence in video games being the most current example, or the greco roman distinction between religious myth and reality. So even the the phrase ‘reality is socially constructed’ is an attempted fraud. The model we use to determine action in reality is and must be produced as a market good like any other, and is limited to the supply and demand of that market – like any other. However… …. the narratives and VALUES we use to NEGOTIATE actions in reality are constructed within that market given the references and referents available. In other words, WE SOCIALLY CONSTRUCT LIES, we SCIENTIFICALLY DISCOVER TRUTHS. And those that work by truth compete best. What surprises me is that it’s not obvious that there is a difference between reality and action and cost and imagination and speech, and not bearing a cost – and that those of us who have achieved in life in the markets for force and commerce, and those who achieve in life … … in the market for fraud, are readily distinguished by whether we use the languages of truth, science, economics, and law, or the language of utility, theology, philosophy, and morality. The fact that you (anyone who subscribes to neo-abrahamism) are speaking about the pseudoscientific origins of such a thing,rather than the GOALS TO ACHIEVE WITH IT, is merely another alt-right nerd-variation on memes. Yeah. Meme’s are fun. Yeah. Sophism is fun. Yes you’re witty. But in the end you’re just poisoning the same well we eventually drink from. Words and priests are cheap, unwarrantied, and without cost. artists, soldiers, craftsmen, engineers, lawyers, accountants, executives, and financiers ACT to produce an end for which they pay the cost. Social construction refers to our ability to create narratives like priests do that cost us nothing, but force costs on the people, by the process of creating moral hazard, by the process of diversion from truth. period. You aren’t philosophers or scientists, but sophists using the ancient technique of deceit by priests with the pretension of special knowledge that doesn’t exist,to fool by complex language and suggestion those who are suckers -and the first sucker is always the man in the mirror.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1545320605 Timestamp) “Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws.” – Nietzsche