Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

I don’t like ‘debates’ because outside of upper academic circles, they’re not wo

I don’t like ‘debates’ because outside of upper academic circles, they’re not worth my time, largely because activists are overcommitted to their near universally faulty priors. I do however love conversations. And conversations with smart people are helpful for the audience.

Source date (UTC): 2019-04-17 16:25:32 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118551073101373441

Reply addressees: @TsarOfNEETs @JoeRossRanchFan @ethnarch_

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118359351847202817

IN REPLY TO:

@WraySwore

@curtdoolittle @JoeRossRanchFan @ethnarch_ He’s a rotating cohost on FtN. Very thoughtful and knowledgeable. It would be a a great, honest debate between you two (if it were to happen)

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118359351847202817

April 17, 2019
(Do I know @ethnarch_ ???) Happy to talk with anyone smart. 😉

(Do I know @ethnarch_ ???) Happy to talk with anyone smart. 😉

Source date (UTC): 2019-04-16 23:01:20 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118288291504295936

Reply addressees: @JoeRossRanchFan @ethnarch_

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118198150425128961

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118198150425128961

April 16, 2019
a) they haven’t ruled out arson unless they’ve found the source of the fire and

a) they haven’t ruled out arson unless they’ve found the source of the fire and its cause. If they had that information they would publish it. It takes time to do it. When they say where it started, how, and by whom, and why then we can end the stress but we don’t trust ‘you’.

Source date (UTC): 2019-04-16 16:10:16 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118184846407417856

Reply addressees: @jftaveira1993

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118183501562556416

IN REPLY TO:

@jftaveira1993

According to French authorities, the blaze appeared to be the accidental result of renovations work—not terrorism or arson. But that hasn’t stopped far-right extremists and wingnuts from floating conspiracy theories about the #NotreDameFire. https://t.co/zDG3DwhnJc #NotreDame

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118183501562556416

April 16, 2019
yep

yep

Source date (UTC): 2019-04-16 12:43:47 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118132879546937344

Reply addressees: @LibrarianVee

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118130656159129602

IN REPLY TO:

@LibrarianVee

@curtdoolittle twin towers

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1118130656159129602

April 16, 2019
(correct as usual)

(correct as usual)

Source date (UTC): 2019-04-16 01:56:11 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1117969905779974144

Reply addressees: @Ozpin_88 @LibrarianVee

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1117968437454753799

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1117968437454753799

April 16, 2019
yep

yep.

Source date (UTC): 2019-04-16 01:15:14 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1117959602245652481

Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1117959457919516672

IN REPLY TO:

@StefanMolyneux

https://t.co/MVIn4mS7x0

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1117959457919516672

April 16, 2019
All good points. But did they have a plan for the site? No. An island. Traffic.

All good points. But did they have a plan for the site? No. An island. Traffic. Pumps. Answer is no. And a visit to France’s churches and their condition, and their having to raise money in the States to pay for the renovation are more explanatory than you kind words.

Source date (UTC): 2019-04-15 22:01:25 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1117910827883851777

Reply addressees: @GreggFavre

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1117847726786371585

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1117847726786371585

April 15, 2019
HEAR THAT??? IT’S THE SOUND OF ACCELERATION

HEAR THAT??? IT’S THE SOUND OF ACCELERATION….

Source date (UTC): 2019-04-15 21:53:42 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1117908886311170048

April 15, 2019
) Assumed you would. But I posted a definition so that others wouldn’t have to.

😉 Assumed you would. But I posted a definition so that others wouldn’t have to. -hugs 😉

Source date (UTC): 2019-04-15 20:48:47 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1117892548012519427

Reply addressees: @robertedecan

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1117889099464151040

IN REPLY TO:

@robertedecan

@curtdoolittle I did look it up

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1117889099464151040

April 15, 2019
RT @robertedecan: @curtdoolittle I did look it up

RT @robertedecan: @curtdoolittle I did look it up

Source date (UTC): 2019-04-15 20:48:30 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1117892478592356352

April 15, 2019