Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

Which is an honest statement, and a rational choice

Which is an honest statement, and a rational choice.

Source date (UTC): 2019-06-16 02:21:50 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140082021550702592

Reply addressees: @TheDonnnieSharp

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140074079719870464

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140074079719870464

June 16, 2019
“Show up or shut up.”—James Knowles (That’s the net of it.)

—“Show up or shut up.”—James Knowles

(That’s the net of it.)

Source date (UTC): 2019-06-16 00:33:14 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1140054690832572420

June 16, 2019
OMG. I can’t really tell if you’re ignorant, stupid, or intellectually dishonest

OMG. I can’t really tell if you’re ignorant, stupid, or intellectually dishonest. “A quantum (probabilistic) function does not require an observer [to change state (collapse)] it requires an action of measurement that interferes with the wave…” ie: physical interaction.

Source date (UTC): 2019-06-15 20:06:52 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139987658871062534

Reply addressees: @HaraldMagnusson

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139985005613080577

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139985005613080577

June 15, 2019
Your use of Pilpul (Lying by Abrahamic Sophism) is obvious to those of us who un

Your use of Pilpul (Lying by Abrahamic Sophism) is obvious to those of us who understand the technique. Realism and Naturalism (metaphysics), Acquisitionism(psych.) Testimonialism (epist), Propertarianism (ethics). Compatibilism(soc.) The rest is just fantasy literature. 😉

Source date (UTC): 2019-06-15 13:05:33 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139881630540161025

Reply addressees: @HaraldMagnusson

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139880366825791489

IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@HaraldMagnusson The physical universe never reaches equilibrium (homogeneity) if only due to vast scale and time. Because of scale, time, and disequilibrium, universes (big bangs) will arise chaotically (assuming temporal independence) or oscillate or froth asymptotically otherwise.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1139880366825791489

IN REPLY TO:

@curtdoolittle

@HaraldMagnusson The physical universe never reaches equilibrium (homogeneity) if only due to vast scale and time. Because of scale, time, and disequilibrium, universes (big bangs) will arise chaotically (assuming temporal independence) or oscillate or froth asymptotically otherwise.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1139880366825791489

June 15, 2019
Explain to me how that makes sense again?

Explain to me how that makes sense again?

Source date (UTC): 2019-06-14 23:22:35 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139674525057069056

Reply addressees: @demontage2000

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139673024251039744

IN REPLY TO:

@demontage2000

@curtdoolittle If you restrict truth to repetition in results of methods for representing objective realities, you risk confusion by missing the truth of natural, subjective differences in neural and cognitive capacities for apprehending those objective realities in the first place.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139673024251039744

June 14, 2019
Especially since every single time someone has argued that position, they’ve bee

Especially since every single time someone has argued that position, they’ve been wrong…..

Source date (UTC): 2019-06-14 16:50:19 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139575806903103493

Reply addressees: @HaraldMagnusson

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139573822275895302

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139573822275895302

June 14, 2019
Why? And why would you assume such a thing? Evidence is that the opposite. that

Why? And why would you assume such a thing? Evidence is that the opposite. that sameness is impossible.

Source date (UTC): 2019-06-14 16:46:37 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139574874521952256

Reply addressees: @HaraldMagnusson

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139573822275895302

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139573822275895302

June 14, 2019
Why?

Why?

Source date (UTC): 2019-06-14 16:35:24 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139572055110823936

Reply addressees: @HaraldMagnusson

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139571332486709249

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139571332486709249

June 14, 2019
“Calculus is hard therefore it’s wrong.”—Bill Joslin (ie: Propertarianism is h

—“Calculus is hard therefore it’s wrong.”—Bill Joslin

(ie: Propertarianism is hard therefore it’s wrong.)

Source date (UTC): 2019-06-14 11:42:55 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139498448795906049

June 14, 2019
Love you back Ricky. Happy you seem happy lately. -hugs

Love you back Ricky. Happy you seem happy lately. -hugs

Source date (UTC): 2019-06-14 00:22:57 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139327329568735233

Reply addressees: @eruditenights

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139326902064185344

IN REPLY TO:

@eruditenights

@curtdoolittle Hey man, just wanted to say I love you dude =), hugs from the South Bay, I hope your mother gets better if she is still ill, she gave birth to one of humanities finest men!

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1139326902064185344

June 14, 2019