Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

Boost of @Truthist7346@BIGSCHMOOL@curtd

Key difference here…”That said, we are not talking about science here.”

Curt and propertarians are always discussing things on a scientific basis, not sophisms. Anyone that goes on babbling about Logos, in my experience, is often a petersonite or a continental. And petersonites and the continentals, like Peterson are often sophists. Even though, they’re on the “same team” as us, they’ll often counter signal accurate attacks on Christianity itself. So, this needs correction.

“Aristotle applied the term (logos) to refer to “reasoned discourse” or “the argument” in the field of rhetoric, and considered it one of the three modes of persuasion alongside ethos and pathos.”

Logos’s semantic use in purely relational (N-dimensions) speech can mean many things to many people (why sophists love it), but it’s deflation just simply means logic, which provides internal consistency to testimony. There are many different dimensions we can test a persons testimony for consistency in.

The total number of these dimensions have been worked out by Curt already in the epistemology of propertarianism called testimonialim. See in image. Failing any one of these tests demonstrates speech as false (incomplete and untrue).

Conflating Christ’s teachings with straight logic is laughable. Even more so, is the claim that it’s (logos) evolution came from Christ or that Christ’s teachings were derived from logos and then he improved upon the ideas of logos.

That’s justificationism for your faith and a lie. No more lies. Yes, billions of people can believe in lies. The only reason Christianity became great was because the scientific extracted truths from it were compatible with natural law and there was nothing in Christianity that wasn’t already present in our civilizations prior to it besides maybe greater degrees of our expressed mercy which isn’t necessarily a good thing.