YES!
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 20:30:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795915691477913681
Reply addressees: @DonaldTNews
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795844069878579227
YES!
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 20:30:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795915691477913681
Reply addressees: @DonaldTNews
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795844069878579227
RT @Richard_0292: @curtdoolittle @BanninYaqoobi Curt is our Hari Seldon.
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 20:04:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795909090087932032
@SRCHicks: Serious question and one I struggle with: what’s the reason for interest in Kant and Hegel? Is it purely historical? Should we learn something useful from it today? Can we understand persistent success of germanic civilization over the past 1800 years or more through that study?
I have come to see, partly because of your influence, the entire German experiment with philosophy as a counter-revolution against the impersonality of anglo legal, economic, and empirical thought. And perhaps a bridge between it and the same French counter-revolution by Rousseau’s attempt at a secular narrative while retaining the middle eastern mythicism of the Church. (Which seems to still hold the French Academy in rapture.)
Now, I work in cognitive science, epistemology, the logics, language, economics and law, which means I share the english frame of references, so I assume I’m missing something?
Thanks so much for all you have done and all you do.
CD
Reply addressees: @SRCHicks
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 19:44:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795904042352185344
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795900981013606679
nope. do your history. especially lebanon.
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 19:29:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795900306116489575
Reply addressees: @NuSecretShopper
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795899925672108370

FOUNDATIONS https://t.co/HmdUAXW4Ti

Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 19:05:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795894284912070910
FOUNDATIONS
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 19:05:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795894284844924928
So apologies for the misunderstanding.
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 18:36:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795887051344056443
Reply addressees: @VRfutureop
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795883650816278536
ATTENTION IS THE FEMININE MIND’S TEST OF SUCCESS
–“This Supreme Court has lost the peopleβs trust”–@NoahBookbinder
Noah, (all);
That’s pure Sophistry, in pursuit of deceit by social construction. (Which is your much deserved reputation.)
Trump never had your trust because you’re not only politically but ethnically hostile to western civilization’s demand for personal responsibility for self, private, and common, in exchange for sovereignty, autonomy, meritocracy, and participation in decision making.
But your feminine cognitive bias cannot overcome the need for authority to bring about by deception, social construction, coercion, and command what cannot be brought about by voluntary exchange under sovereignty autonomy and meritocracy.
There is no difference between a middle eastern priest, a rabbi, a leftist academic, a leftist public intellectual, and a leftist politician all of whom use the false promise(socially constructed fraud), that if given power, that they will produce equality when, in the end they produce ignorance decay dysgenia and destruction.
There is no existing female polity, no surviving jewish polity that wasn’t given by europeans – and the jury is still out on survival, not much of a islamic economy, government or army, and no successful marxist, society, polity state, or civilization.
Because you’re simply wrong. Why? Just like women, you’re operating by the demand for attention not the pursuit of good or excellence.
In other words attention is your objective not the excellent the good or the true.
(And yes we even have the cognitive science to back it up)
Cheers
CD
Reply addressees: @NoahBookbinder
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 18:35:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795886650817409024
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795496732698026277
Yes. (at least mostly yes.). π
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 18:10:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795880503251243346
Reply addressees: @Susan_Yogini
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795866244693811470
But disciplined dance or impulsive dance? π
Source date (UTC): 2024-05-29 17:58:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795877428876702061
Reply addressees: @Lughedd @TabbyTeamster @NuSecretShopper
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1795873116872114594