Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • “Intellectual Elitism”— So Yeah. It’s about time we had someone other than Kin

    —“Intellectual Elitism”—

    So Yeah. It’s about time we had someone other than Kind hearted Hayek, Gentle Soul Sowell, and justifiably fire-in-the-theater yelling Buchanan.

    So yeah. I do the intellectual thing.
    I do truth, law, revolution, violence.

    Then, raise the jolly roger, and cut throats.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:12:43 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508158218698950

  • MISUNDERSTANDING ONE ANOTHER Yes, I stomp on people who are out of line. And yes

    MISUNDERSTANDING ONE ANOTHER

    Yes, I stomp on people who are out of line. And yes I get it wrong. I get it wrong particularly when you are trying to be cunning or witty or use some pop cultural reference – ’cause I don’t do pop culture.

    Sure, you want me to step into your frame of mind, and understand what you intend. And by reciprocity I want you to step into mine.

    I curate the hell out of my feed to maintain the quality. How many morons do I have to deal with every single day, day in, and day out, who say stupid sh*t?

    I can’t keep track of everyone – there are ten thousand here, and an equal number of lurkers.

    SO when I fuck up because I don’t understand some reference, just point it out, and I’ll apologise.

    But if I can understand whether you’re being supportive, or a moron, then how can anyone else?

    So no harm no foul, sorry for misinterpreting you, and sorry for the hard pushback.

    Just treat me the same way – be careful what you say in public that can be misinterpreted – thereby forcing me to spend time in aggressive curation of the feed that I”d rather spend NOT doing that.

    πŸ˜‰ -hugs brother.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:11:49 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508154683420030

  • MAYBE BUT I CAN’T SEE ROLLING BACK THE CLOCK OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE. —“White

    MAYBE BUT I CAN’T SEE ROLLING BACK THE CLOCK OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE.

    —“White Anglo-Saxon Protestants, in particular, might turn to the Bible in somewhat the manner of their Angelcynn ancestors in the time of Alfred the Great.”— Kevin Macdonald.

    @TOOEdit

    I would love to have this discussion with you because I’m torn between the demonstrated value of the group strategy in Christianity, and the method of delivery (semitic parable) and the method of persuasion (False Promise, Baiting into Moral Hazard, Pilpul and Critique.)

    Same with Duchesne. He also puts value in Christianity that I don’t see. And it might be because of the radius of corruption that extends out from the Church – especially Italy. Studying Economics and Law produces a very different history from Theo, Phil, and and Literature.

    All peoples need a binding narrative that contains a group strategy, a means of decidability(morality), a means of ‘mindfulness’ for personal, interpersonal, and social, a means of status equalization (festivals), for what’s reducible to maintaining a neural economy. Why Xianity?

    And can Christianity be reformed so that we preserve the historical commonality of strategy, but have supernatural, moral-normative, and ratio-scientific means of education (indoctrination, training) that doesn’t make us vulnerable to semitism (submission, sophism) and “lying”?

    Religion has been the hardest problem in social science, and it’s precisely the invulnerability to rational argument that provides intergenerational transmission with minimum modification of the underlying strategy.

    (Thanks for letting me think out loud. πŸ˜‰ )


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:08:24 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508141243321700

  • Um…. you wanna explain to me how it is, where these freemasons are, and how ma

    Um…. you wanna explain to me how it is, where these freemasons are, and how many there are, and what they’re doing?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:03:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154754211005030401

    Reply addressees: @JSp46305240

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154742056507625473


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable β€” we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154742056507625473

  • IF YOU CAN FIND SOMEONE BETTER, THEN HAVE AT IT. (rant) —“I found him online b

    IF YOU CAN FIND SOMEONE BETTER, THEN HAVE AT IT.
    (rant)

    —“I found him online by listening to a John Mark video. I’ve recently started to notice he seems more into himself and his own status as β€œsuper genius β€œ than helping his fellow wypipo.”— Tiffany Tiffany

    Well someone actually hit a nerve. πŸ˜‰
    I have them. lol
    That hurt.

    I am doing the best I know how to do. Mostly it works. And I’m pretty good at what it is I do – not what you want me to do – which is be a priest with secular christian message of hopefulness that panders to your frame of reference and expectations

    I play king of the hill games. It is how to teach men by dominance play. It is the best way to teach men, because you do not waste your time on the failures – meanwhile those who have potential can watch and learn until they are able to try. And even when they fail they come back after a year or two once they learn enough to play the game. and that frame is male Meritocracy: Heroism, Excellence. Superiority.

    And the problem is that this technique is definitely an issue for
    – Women (equality, terror at losing face)
    – Christians (equality, pacifism , terror at falsification)
    – Working, Laboring, Underclass, Undesirable Men who feel left behind. (desperation for peer leadership,on their terms,)

    1. And that is because we want collective victory on the terms of our FRAMES.

    2. And that is because we all discover and use the FRAMES that reflect our gender, sexual, social, economic, and political, market values.

    3. And because (importantly) western civilization provides a market for frames, so we have frames to choose from – despite everyone wanting their frame to take priority.

    4. And that is because we all want leaders in our frame – except those FRAMES HAVE ALL FAILED.

    5. The West has (Europeans) generally succeeded when rallying all markets for FRAMES against a common enemy, or in pursuit of a common opportunity (indo european expansion, resistance to persia and , greco roman expansion, resistance to islam, arabs, and turks, colonial expansion, world wars, industrial technological market expansion.)

    Because it is the only time we create a monopoly instead of a market – and this vacillation between monopoly in war, and market in all else is what makes is different, more adaptive, and faster evolving than the rest of mankind.

    You WANT and all mankind wants MONOPOLY which is only achievable in supernatural or sophomoric or pseudoscientific ignorance, poverty, and equality in ignorance and poverty. This is the muslim religion’ strategy. To drag everyone to the bottom where they are equal in ignorance, poverty and dysgenia. Whereas the CHinese and Indian are merely stagnation, our is continuous competition, adaptation, innovation – and that is why our law is ‘scientific’ and why , as a consequence, we developed reason and science: because markets cannot function by any other means – particularly markets between frames that reflect a hierarchy of abilities.

    ( … )


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 14:00:37 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508110582615842

  • AN EXAMPLE: WHY DO ECHO CHAMBERS MATTER? —“Sounds like fancy-talk for an echo

    AN EXAMPLE: WHY DO ECHO CHAMBERS MATTER?

    —“Sounds like fancy-talk for an echo chamber.”—Alan Levinovitz

    What you mean is, you want to be able to coerce people with disapproval, shaming, rallying, moralizing, psychologizing, reputation destruction, sophism, and pseudoscience rather than exchange value with them in the markets private or common(government).

    I mean, why does it matter what they say to each other. what have you got to trade, and why aren’t you offering to trade, instead of engaging in sophisms of pilpul and critique (straw manning)? Right? I mean, why words not deeds? To preserve the ability to coerce, cheat, lie?

    There are no political questions that cannot be answered by this simple question of ‘what do you have to trade?’. Conversely, any OTHER attempt is merely out of necessity an attempted act of lying, cheating, or fraud.

    So what do you have to trade instead of engaging in the straw man critique of “echo chamber” as an act of sophistry to distract from having nothing to exchange, or trying to ‘cheat’ them, when the only moral constraints that exist are those between cooperators not their enemies?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:50:02 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508068996006457

  • James Santagata is a genius. Really…. (People that cunning are scary.)

    James Santagata is a genius. Really….

    (People that cunning are scary.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 13:18:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154742843958812672

  • love you man. -hugs back

    love you man. -hugs back.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 02:32:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154580200681889793

    Reply addressees: @ClownBa73413423

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154579987661512704


    IN REPLY TO:

    @FullAccountant

    @curtdoolittle I know I make things difficult for you Curt. I like to play with you in a similar fashion you like to play with your followers. I won’t ever tell you when I’m serious or not because that ruins the fun. But on a serious note, what I can say to you is I very much respect you. hugs

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154579987661512704

  • ” It is easy to walk away with that perception because he is a high functioning

    —” It is easy to walk away with that perception because he is a high functioning autist(πŸ˜‚) but I believe he is genuine even if he is misguided at times.”—Zach Ferguson

    (and yeah, the aspie thing is an issue. i try. but it’s … hard.)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 02:30:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154579630931755008

  • Your … communications .. are random numbers, and I can rarely tell whether you

    Your … communications .. are random numbers, and I can rarely tell whether you’re serious, silly or high. I presume the latter – often. But the good ones are worth sifting for. πŸ˜‰ -hugs man.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-26 02:12:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154575307699032069

    Reply addressees: @ClownBa73413423

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154573206155603969


    IN REPLY TO:

    @FullAccountant

    @curtdoolittle Sounds like you don’t appreciate the way I communicate…

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1154573206155603969