Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • WHAT QUALIFIES YOU TO DISAGREE? —“It baffles the mind that anyone listens to y

    WHAT QUALIFIES YOU TO DISAGREE?

    —“It baffles the mind that anyone listens to you [Molyneux] as an authority on anything. I wouldn’t trust you know how to wipe your own a**.”—@Berderking

    Conversely,what qualifies you to disagree? One can never believe an authority, unless you’re a fool. One can falsify or not, or propose a more parsimonious argument or not. One can falsify a preference or not by demonstrating involuntary transfer of costs either direction or not.

    So aside from (a) demonstrating you’re a fool by demand for an authority, (b) by doing so admitting you’re incompetent to judge, (c) feigning falsehood when you’re disapproving, and (d) making a statement contrary to the empirical evidence of his popularity – what have you got?

    😉


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:46:43 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576475525496506

  • KING OF THE HILL GAMES, ALL DAY EVERY DAY. —I am just doing my job which is fi

    KING OF THE HILL GAMES, ALL DAY EVERY DAY.

    —I am just doing my job which is finding a provocative statement to generate discussion and expose people’s thoughts, that would not be exposed by surveys.—


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:45:26 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576470524453809

  • TEACHER’S SALARIES VS ATHLETE’S SALARIES by Luke Weinhagen Having school age chi

    TEACHER’S SALARIES VS ATHLETE’S SALARIES
    by Luke Weinhagen

    Having school age children I often hear complaints about teachers salaries.

    They frequently take the form of “there is something wrong with a society that values entertainment so much more than education that it pays its athletes millions while teachers struggle to get by”.

    Right comparison, wrong complaint.

    There is something wrong with a society who’s standards and application of rigor to be a professional teacher are so significantly lower than those required to be a professional athlete that this pay disparity can survive.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:40:17 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576450229603777

  • LEFTIST FEMINIST PSYCHOS ARE USEFUL IDIOTS. Ah, no we are just experimenting wit

    LEFTIST FEMINIST PSYCHOS ARE USEFUL IDIOTS.

    Ah, no we are just experimenting with you given that Noah Revoy has found a hot spot, hot spots generate controversy, controversy attracts eyeballs, some percentage of eyeballs will resonate with our movement, and you will have provided us with free advertising, marketing, and promotion.

    Ask Noah how many new customers he’s gotten because of you already. (I know the answer, which is why we’re keeping you ruffled.) You aren’t very smart or you would realize that the only possible negative feedback you can give that will work is to do nothing.

    Look at what molyneux is doing right now for the same reason. You are fulfilling the same function as the Psycho Four congresswomen – driving people do us, because you’re so absurd.

    So please, keep it up, keep running left. Don’t try to create savings, careers, families, businesses, industries, or long term capital in the commons. Just keep trying to force spending and debt.

    We love you.
    You’re perfect.
    Predicable.
    Catastrophic.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:33:39 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576424171714589

  • FOUL “OUCHES” OF THE DAY – ANTI-LEFT-FEMINIST EDITION “Yes I know. I’m prolific.

    FOUL “OUCHES” OF THE DAY – ANTI-LEFT-FEMINIST EDITION

    “Yes I know. I’m prolific. I touch type. I make typos. But you make “stupids”. And you don’t even know it.”

    “Does your phone do bark recognition? Or has someone trained you to type?”

    “You look like $3 trailer whore who gives discounts on volume”

    “Are those extra holes in your body an attempt at increasing revenue opportunities?”

    “You’re a psycho. So, conversely, why do we men let you leave the home, have property rights under the law, earn in the workforce, utter public speech, or participate in governance? I mean, it’s clearly not in our interests, and we can easily reverse it.”

    Now, can we stick with the Grammars, Testimony, Natural Law? Compatibilism. Policy. A revised Constitution, Universal Nationalism? Restoration of the balance of powers? a New Renaissance? And Revolution to bring it about?

    Ok. “Cause I’m tryin’ to work here and while all this trash talking is fun, I’m about three months behind schedule.

    All good? Ok. Thanks. Move along now.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:31:38 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576416231761351

  • Untitled Image Post


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:29:31 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576407923003270

  • “One of poison’s great virtues for the politically minded murderer is their capa

    —“One of poison’s great virtues for the politically minded murderer is their capacity to combine easy deniability and vicious theatricality. Even while the murderer denies any role, perhaps with a sly wink, the victim dies a horrific and often lengthy death. A message in a poison bottle,”—

    —Mark Galeotti, the Royal United Services Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:28:16 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576402994415895

  • HAVE YOU TRIED TURNING THE WORLD OFF AND BACK ON AGAIN? by Eric Best –We can cr

    HAVE YOU TRIED TURNING THE WORLD OFF AND BACK ON AGAIN?
    by Eric Best

    –We can crash the world. It’s easy. And I’m getting reasonably sure we’re going to do it.–Curt Doolittle

    Normie Version:

    …”Help, there is something wrong with the world! It’s not working right! Everything’s fucked!”

    Help Desk Doolittle:

    … “Have you tried turning it off and back on again?”
    .
    .


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:27:44 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576400932455750

  • THE OTHER REASON TALEB IS WRONG. THE UN-TRUSTWORTHY. By Curt Doolittle, The Prop

    THE OTHER REASON TALEB IS WRONG. THE UN-TRUSTWORTHY.
    By Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute

    We presume intelligence is the driving factor in our differences in life outcomes. It’s just the driving factor for (a) rate of learning (b) working with complexity. Conscientiousness is evenly distributed across the spectrum of complexity regardless of intelligence. So the market demand is for minimum necessary intelligence and conscientiousness. And then by intelligence sufficient for the degree of complexity. But, what isn’t in that dichotomy is our incentives. This is where Taleb makes his second mistake. Just as we pay police to avoid corruption, we pay people more to avoid corruption. We are not paid just for conscientiousness, or just for complexity, but for loyalty and consequence.

    So instead of just Intelligence, we have:
    a) Reward for Conscientiousness (quality),
    b) Reward for Intelligence (complexity),
    c) Reward for Scarcity (by income) , and
    d) Reward for Insurance (by status and security)

    The Chinese bureaucracy was successful, because of the training and incentive against corruption, in exchange for the status and predictability of income – and why the German and French have been, and why the American has not been, and why the Semitic people have never been able to develop (a) civic trust or truthful speech (b) commons, (c) governments at scale, (d) nations at scale, (e) companies at scale (f) economies at scale, (g) a durable civilization without consuming an existing great one, and (h) why the Semites produce an ibn Khaldun (low trust), instead of Locke, Smith, Hume, Hamilton, Adams, and Jefferson, Pareto, Darwin, Menger, Maxwell, Nietzsche or Hayek (High Trust).

    Taleb hates the answer: (a) intelligence matters in the suppression of parasitism, (b) rewarding it with income, status, and security matters in the suppression of parasitism (c) dysgenia results from low trust, poverty results from low trust, and inability to innovate results from low trust, leaving only consumption and distrust and small scale corrupt organizations, (d) he and his ‘Fat Tony’ profit only because in a high trust society and civilization under rule of law, with scale institutions, both private and public, the opportunities for immoral (non-productive) windfalls exist – precisely because we are so high trust we never even THINK of the kinds of scams that Taleb, Fat Tony, (George Soros), imagine. In other words, all Taleb has managed to do across his books is explain why he could come to the west to make money but his people live in ignorance, superstition, tribalism, deceit, and relative poverty.

    ( … continued )


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:23:31 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576384220810882

  • DOOLITTLE’S “SCAM” OR DOOLITTLE’S PLAN? —“A handful of observant readers of yo

    DOOLITTLE’S “SCAM” OR DOOLITTLE’S PLAN?

    —“A handful of observant readers of your page might notice the whole scam that you have going here at this point:
    You’re too much of a pussy even though you’re so full of ideology… Too much of a pussy to do the thing that you want to do so you get young impressionable men to listen to your words. They’ve got a little bit more piss and vinegar in them so they’ll actually go do the hard work for you without spending too much energy thinking about it. I don’t expect you to be so intellectually honest as to tell them all that’s what’s actually happening here right?”— Casey King, Jacksonville Florida.
    ( facebook.com/CaseyLKing)

    —“Has that not been the underlying strategy for war since the dawn of civilization?”—John Dabb

    Of course it is the underlying strategy for war since the dawn of civilization, and the dawn of man. He [Casey King] is just (like a woman) using GSRRM – in this case (a) a straw man, and (b) moralizing, and (c) shaming – because he doesn’t have an argument. Because dim people, lacking ability, experience, knowledge, and agency can only demonstrate disapproval and shaming and rallying – they have no other ability to work with.

    The Straw Man
    (a) You should run into public and so something dramatic, symbolic, and emotional (ie: be a woman).
    (b) otherwise you are immoral (irreciprocal, dishonest)
    (c) because, you are asking other men to run into the public and do something symbolic, and emotional (ie: be women).

    Reality, Repeated Daily
    (a) Doolittle’s Message is:
    … Never act until we all act
    (b) And
    … Act when we have;
    … … – a moral license (check)
    … … – a set of actionable demands (check)
    … … – a plan of transition (check)
    … … – a means of winning by insurrection (check)
    … When
    … … – we can rally sufficient starting numbers (~.1M-1M) (Check)
    … … – the overton window is over the conservative mean. (Almost)
    … Where
    … … – Our demands solve the problems of the era (check)
    … … – it’s immoral to fail to accept them (check)
    … … – giving us moral license for war to restore the constitution (check)
    … Therefore
    … … – We can negotiate and settle before violence.
    … … – Or, We can escalate to force negotiation
    … … – Or, We can escalate to force submission
    … … – Or, We can escalate into decimation.
    … Because
    … … – we are the largest army in the world by orders of magnitude.

    What is john doing?
    What are curt and ely doing?
    What are bill and the majority of Propertarians doing?

    See?

    But simpletons see the world through simpleton eyes.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:13:46 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576345942100282