Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

RACES
I share this kind of thing with regularity. But why is it necessary?

The feminine cognitive attempt to rewrite history in teh same manner the semitic civilizations promoted mythicism instead of history: loading, framing, and deceiving.

There are three primary actors in the pseudoscientific attack on human differences.
1) Boaz and boazian anthropology all of which is, as stated above, mythicism – there is no science behind it.
2) The frankfurt school of social science, which, as stated above, produced mythicism – again, they literally ‘made it up’ – there is no science behind it.
3) Perhaps most importantly, Lewontin, and lewontin’s fallacy of the non-existence of race because of statistical fictionalisms (mythicism) he invented and which have no logical or scientific foundation.
All of these people were jewish, meaning, of semitic genetic and cultural extraction. Jewish culture is the most advance culture using the feminine strategy, just as europeans are the most using the masculine strategy.

I shouldn’t perhaps have to illustrate the female tendency to storytell (semitic mythicism) vs the male tendency to testify (european history). Nor point out that the intellectual elites in the middle east copied what they could of european thought, but used it to advance their feminine strategy (authoritarian falsehood) over the extant and obviously more successful masculine strategy (rational and empirical truth).