@Azure Amaranthine You really aren’t up to this category of arguments – or concepts. Let me help you. 1 – The culmination of 20th century investigation into the scientific method was that there is no via-positiva scientific method – nor is there any via-positiva logic. Instead, the scientific method consists of producing testifiable testimony regardless of via positiva method of investigation, and the logics test the consistency of constant relations from given premises. 2 – In case you didn’t grasp it the first time: Determinism(ideal), Deterministic(within limits), Determinable (within limits), just as Truth (ideal), Truth (within limits of speech), and Truthful (within limits of testimony). 3) The universe is deterministic (describable by rules of arbitrary precision), but not does not fit determinism (the scale of the universe and causal density at lowest scales makes a general rule of infinite precision (at present) unlikely, whereas we can, and have, produced (identified) many general rules of arbitrary(scale within paradigm) precision. So gain, Please. Dispense your sophims upon those who are impressed, by your desperate search for dominance expression, and leave those of us who are adults (and men) to do our duty: protecting the informational commons from overconfident men and solipsistic women.
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
Disgust
Disgust https://ift.tt/2zzbpPq
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-30 13:39:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167431652521459716
-
virtue– no, thats wisdom literature, or self help. You’re just making stuff up
–virtue–
no, thats wisdom literature, or self help.
You’re just making stuff up now.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 15:54:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167103231077621760
Reply addressees: @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167102971487956992
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz It’s my job. It’s what I do. -cheers
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1167102971487956992
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz It’s my job. It’s what I do. -cheers
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1167102971487956992
-
It’s my job. It’s what I do. -cheers
It’s my job. It’s what I do. -cheers
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 15:53:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167102971487956992
Reply addressees: @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167102800192593925
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz I didn’t. I’m familiar with the long running debate over the criteria for being named a philosopher vs author, essayist, commentarian, theologian vs charlatan, and between self help, wisdom lit, philosophy, logic, science, history and their conflation in theology
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1167102800192593925
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz I didn’t. I’m familiar with the long running debate over the criteria for being named a philosopher vs author, essayist, commentarian, theologian vs charlatan, and between self help, wisdom lit, philosophy, logic, science, history and their conflation in theology
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1167102800192593925
-
I didn’t. I’m familiar with the long running debate over the criteria for being
I didn’t. I’m familiar with the long running debate over the criteria for being named a philosopher vs author, essayist, commentarian, theologian vs charlatan, and between self help, wisdom lit, philosophy, logic, science, history and their conflation in theology
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 15:52:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167102800192593925
Reply addressees: @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167101665813512192
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167101665813512192
-
So does that mean that because Aristotle used ‘first mover’ he was not a philoso
So does that mean that because Aristotle used ‘first mover’ he was not a philosopher? Or that kant was trying to create secular version of theology? Or that Adams and Jefferson failed to solve the problem of return of undecidable matters to the legislature?
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 15:41:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167100041586270209
Reply addressees: @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167098386257866752
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167098386257866752
-
One does not agree with evidence, it is simply what it is. And empirically you a
One does not agree with evidence, it is simply what it is. And empirically you are incorrect. Which doesn’t surprise me. 😉
Now go play in the kiddie pool and leave adult arguments for adult minds.
Don’t waste my time. Thanks.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 15:29:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167097054415507461
Reply addressees: @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167095287480864769
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167095287480864769
-
@JakeWojtowicz Influential among philosophers, Intellectuals, Politicians – or a
@JakeWojtowicz
Influential among philosophers, Intellectuals, Politicians – or among common people? Some of us work in R&D (like Research Academics), and some in Education (like Teaching… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=456610398269189&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 15:27:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167096526369431552
-
You can claim that Stefan didn’t produce a durable work of philosophy – and that
You can claim that Stefan didn’t produce a durable work of philosophy – and that would be true (Zizek either). And that it is difficult to disambiguate from self help (wisdom) rather than decidability (truth). But he practices the grammar of philosophy, and has produced a work.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 15:26:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167096174597292032
Reply addressees: @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167095115346784258
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz You just engaged in conflationa and sophism in the Abrahamic (GSRRM, Pilpul, Critique). And it’s unlikely that the others you mentioned know the difference. Peterson practices science but relies on suggestion using wisdom lit rather than operationalism. Borderline theology.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1167095115346784258
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz You just engaged in conflationa and sophism in the Abrahamic (GSRRM, Pilpul, Critique). And it’s unlikely that the others you mentioned know the difference. Peterson practices science but relies on suggestion using wisdom lit rather than operationalism. Borderline theology.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1167095115346784258
-
You just engaged in conflationa and sophism in the Abrahamic (GSRRM, Pilpul, Cri
You just engaged in conflationa and sophism in the Abrahamic (GSRRM, Pilpul, Critique). And it’s unlikely that the others you mentioned know the difference. Peterson practices science but relies on suggestion using wisdom lit rather than operationalism. Borderline theology.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-29 15:22:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167095115346784258
Reply addressees: @slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1167094277010284544
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz There is a demarcation between a philosopher and public intellectual, in the USE of that grammar of constant relations.
My specialty is the disambiguation of science (operationalism), natural law, rational philosophy, justificationism, sophism, pseudoscience and supernaturalism.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1167094277010284544
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@slimshadyrap98 @StefanMolyneux @JakeWojtowicz There is a demarcation between a philosopher and public intellectual, in the USE of that grammar of constant relations.
My specialty is the disambiguation of science (operationalism), natural law, rational philosophy, justificationism, sophism, pseudoscience and supernaturalism.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1167094277010284544