Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

Between what and what?

Between what and what?

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 10:48:05 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174273882934710273

Reply addressees: @_inline_ @Biorealism @charliekirk11 @TuckerCarlson @thespandrell @Steve_Sailer

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174215085159591938

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174215085159591938

September 18, 2019
The Question Doesn’t Matter…. 😉

The Question Doesn’t Matter…. 😉 https://propertarianism.com/2019/09/18/the-question-doesnt-matter/

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 02:12:47 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174144204202754048

September 18, 2019
1. Please explain how you possess sufficient knowledge to make any such judgemen

1. Please explain how you possess sufficient knowledge to make any such judgement. 2.Please explain why anything I would say would alter your conviction. 3. No I will not feed your desire for attention and false self confidence. 4. And yes, I’m a genius – which should be obvious.

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 02:03:11 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174141788564676608

Reply addressees: @PAINSCOURT @StevePender

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174137782631112704

IN REPLY TO:

@PAINSCOURT

@curtdoolittle @StevePender Please explain genius how 2 random acts yielded 4 identical results twin towers struck by planes and buildings 6 & 7.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174137782631112704

September 18, 2019
Cost of doing discursive business in this venue. It’s like teaching in a locker

Cost of doing discursive business in this venue. It’s like teaching in a locker room at 1930’s reform school…. Either have to quite, mute with abandon, or fight back on their terms. Temperament decides the choice.

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 01:12:36 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174129060668170241

Reply addressees: @LTF_01 @charlesmurray

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174124132893638657

IN REPLY TO:

@LTF_01

@charlesmurray That actually might help. I’ve only got two accounts muted and can already think of many more I should flush.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174124132893638657

September 18, 2019
Fake. Obvious fake. Been around forever

Fake. Obvious fake. Been around forever.

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 00:33:20 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174119174874025985

Reply addressees: @PAINSCOURT @StevePender

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173095924710723585

IN REPLY TO:

@PAINSCOURT

A plane didn’t hit this one maybe some office workers had some firecrackers https://t.co/FFtpDQEI1P

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173095924710723585

September 18, 2019
GSRRM is admission of lack of argument, by resorting to poisoning the well, unde

GSRRM is admission of lack of argument, by resorting to poisoning the well, undermining, ad reputation destruction: the use of female’s conflict strategy of disapproval and outcasting in male’s rational discourse on the truth. 😉

https://propertarianism.com/2019/02/23/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 22:27:20 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174087465872875520

Reply addressees: @jbouie

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174072740313276418

IN REPLY TO:

@jbouie

there’s a lot you could critique about my writing and the arguments i choose to make but for whatever reason the standard line for guys like williamson is that i’m an ignorant know-nothing

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174072740313276418

September 17, 2019
You must have a reading comprehension problem? Tutors are available. Let’s diagr

You must have a reading comprehension problem? Tutors are available. Let’s diagram the sentence. What’s the subject? “Those who seek to destroy…” followed by a list of what they destroy. And, they may state the target of their destruction by via positiva or via negativa means.

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 21:58:09 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174080122225385473

Reply addressees: @Brian_Alford @sarahfranks2120 @DineshDSouza

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174078841481875456

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174078841481875456

September 17, 2019
You didn’t ask for an explanation of ‘the evil disease’. You asked ‘Who is they’

You didn’t ask for an explanation of ‘the evil disease’. You asked ‘Who is they’. I answered your question. If you don’t know the set of markets you’re just ignorant of them. You could ask that question too. Your ignorance isn’t my failing, & your approval isn’t a truth or good.

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 21:51:42 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174078501588279309

Reply addressees: @Brian_Alford @sarahfranks2120 @DineshDSouza

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174076763900481536

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174076763900481536

September 17, 2019
I’m not very up on pop political nonsense, but is the Kavanaugh uproar a reactio

I’m not very up on pop political nonsense, but is the Kavanaugh uproar a reaction to Ginsberg’s new bout of cancer? Or the exhaustion of the Trump hunt? Or just ‘coincidence’ (Apologies for my ignorance.)

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 21:26:36 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174072185931087874

September 17, 2019
^Or reductively, what this person said. 😉

^Or reductively, what this person said. 😉

Source date (UTC): 2019-09-17 21:17:10 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174069809388097536

Reply addressees: @sarahfranks2120 @Brian_Alford @DineshDSouza

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174068388899020800

IN REPLY TO:

Original post on X

Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174068388899020800

September 17, 2019